This is a blog and an issue I have wanted to address for a long time. I created this website around 2010/2011 after researching 9/11 for many years. Once I discovered that 9/11 and nearly every other major mass casualty event were merely media hoaxes, it was then that I decided to put my time and effort into researching NASA.
    Now before you go on, if you doubt my sanity or credibility on any other issue please feel free to click a link to a page on it where I have rationally with help of others of course non more than my co host James Sloan and the late Justin Cooke. You will, if you are open minded in the first place and you realize conspiracies exist, you will enjoy the site and especially the radio archive with tons of shows. All that being said back to NASA

    In about 2012 I looked into the Apollo Moon Landings. To be honest with you after becoming somewhat of what I consider let's say a good identifier of media fakery since that is basically what my website had become years ago, it was clearly easy to see NASA had faked the moon landings.  No this blog is not going to be like most Facebook posts full of videos and memes. Honestly I have plenty for you to see and many you will see yourself, if you do take an interest in this topic. I'll save all that for the webpage I build for this controversial topic. For now let's just talk. 

    Why am I talking about the moon landing? What does that have to do with you the shape of the earth? Well everything really. You see not only did they fake landing on the moon, they faked the image of Earth from space. Not one by the way. Every image of Earth from space is a fake. Simply CGI. But you have heard it before I know....all the pics of Earth from space are CGI or fakes right? Google or goto NASAs site so you know the images are the "official" pics of Earth, and really honestly look at it. Its not a picture. It's a graphic. While that is TRUE, Still HOWEVER if you doubt that, you can also with just a few minutes worth of research you can see them caught in the act clearly on video staging the shot of the earth and faking their distance saying they are halfway to the moon. They literally tell you the camera is pressed against the window and that distant object out the window is Earth but in reality the camera was at the back of the shuttle or whatever they were in and the walls AROUND that CIRCULAR window were all blacked out to appear as deep space around a distant earth since it looked so small versus the faked background. This trickery was clever but they screwed up and got their arm in the shot a few times exposing the hoax. Clearly showing the camera was not pressed against the window as they said. This and all other moon issues are adressed on my moon hoax page on this site but that documentary exposing that part of it is called a Funny thing happened on the way to the moon.

   I want to keep it moving though. So naturally after realizing they faked the moon landings(and its so obvious guys you can debunk Apollo in a good weekend) It's that bad. After that, obviously at least in my mind but apparently not in many others, NASA couldn't be trusted for anything. So what happened next? How about the "Mars Landing" pep rally? Johnny 5 on Mars? The press conference USA USA chanting?? You don't believe that do you? Did you see the post conference and that clown that kept looking for help in the crowd cuz he couldn't answer anything?? How do we get streaming video from Mars and much deeper in space , yet I can't get cell service down the street sometimes??

   OK so what else are they faking? Turns out all but one Challenger Astronaut has been found alive and well and even using their own names for the most part. 
These are not look alikes. I have posted their pictures below.

    Then there is the "ISS". The ISS footage if filled with green screen technology glitches, CGI, Parabolic Manuevers on planes called Zero G Planes to simulate weightlesnness and much footage actually filmed in dark pools, specifically the space walks. There is undeniable evidence of all of this. Even bubbles rising in the damn pools. You just have to be open minded enough to look.

    Satellites? Well people photograph the moon as much as anything right?? Ever see a satellite pass by the moon? Satellites are really ground based communications. Some possibly done with high alititude balloons. One Satellite rcently crashed in S America I believe it was, and It was just a device suspended by a huge balloon. NASA owns the biggest supply of helium in the world by the way. Arthur C Clarke wrote about them in a science fiction book and several years later NASA "Launched" the first one. So how does all this tie into flat earth? Well All of it is to cover this lie. Mainly taking a picture of Earth from space. They needed a space program to do that ya know? You can't just present a picture of Earth from space and say I don't know how we got it but it's proof. Well maybe you could people don't question who the cameraman was on the moon filming Neil Armstrongs first steps on the moon.

  I am going to get into many proofs of a Flat Earth as well as explanations of what you believe in what science says, and what the real much more reasonable explanation is.

Have you ever felt the Earth spin???? No you have not. Have you ever seen the Earth Curve?? No you have not. They also go out of their way to fake the curvature with distorted lenses that are easy to tell they are bending the horizon no better example than the Red Bull Jump which was a complete hoax and done to show a round earth. Its a joke. Watch the earth go concave, convex, flat,etc all during his decent due to the fisheye lense. When the cockpit camera sees out the door the horizon is perfectly flat. Its always flat and it always rises to your eye level. Just use some common sense. STOP TRUSTNG THE GOVERNMENT OR NASA. I can not believe I need to tell anyone of you this by this point. So you can't feel motion, yet you are told you are moving. At INSANE speeds and directions.  You can't and NO ONE has ever measured the alleged curvature of this sphere. I will be posting plenty of evidence of all this if you want more on the topic but it is true, in FACT what has been happening is lets say you are on a ball, that ball has to drop obviously as things move away. There is a formula for this curvature since the Earth is said to be just under 25,000 miles around the curvature is 8 inches per mile squared. Yet people have been taking pictures across the ocean now at distances of 30, 40, 50,60 miles and more. Josh Nowicki took a picutre of Chicago from across Lake Michigan and at the distance of over 50 miles the entire skyline should have been below the curve but not only could you see Chicago you could see almost the entire thing. Then what do they do to counter his photo going viral?? A weatherman comes on TV talks about the picture blowing up the internet and tells you its a mirage!! So you aren't seeing simply what you are seeing.

   So what about pilots? Clearly flying around a ball they must constantly nose down the plane or they will end up in outerspace. You can't fly straight and go around a ball. It would drop under you. It's common sense. Now everytime they can't explain something like this they say Gravity. So this THEORY gravity that has never been proven not only knows how to indidually stick millions of different objects animals and people to the earth, but it is weak enough to let butterflies fly, strong enough to hold the oceans on while we spin 1038 mph at the equator, now it also makes planes curve around the ball perfectly?? NO. SIMPLY SAID PILOTS DO NOT ADJUST FOR CURVATURE! EVER!! Just that should raise an eyebrow. You wanna say it's gravity? Gravity is just density and bouyancy. If something is heavier than the air it is in, guess what it does. It falls. Helium balloons rise cuz helium is lighter than the air we breathe. What are we going to believe they are gravity defying balloons??

   You also believe the Sun is 93 MILLION MILES AWAY! 93 Million. Would you have ever come to that assumption on your own or were you taught that as a kid and told to repeat it to pass your tests in school? What with your own senses would ever tell you the sun is that far? Have you ever even looked at the sun's rays? Sometimes they come in at like 45 degree angles. How does that work if they are coming from 93 MILLION MILES. If they could even reach that far wouldn't only straight rays not MISS THE EARTH ENTIRELY? Of course. Try an experiment. A Simple one I thought of. Put a quarter on your floor across your room. That's the sun (OBVIOUSLY NOT TO SCALE). Now put a dime on the other side of your room. that's the Earth. How do angled rays come outta the quarter and hit the dime? Now add millions of miles in between... HHHHMMMMM

   How about another impossibility. You can research all of these and it should be at least clear you have been duped. We are told the Moon reflects the suns light correct? So if I am in the sunlight and its 90 degrees and I wanna cool off I go in the shade where say its 80 degrees. Now when I say the moon emits cold light I don't mean cuz it's at night. Use your head. Lets say it is later that night and you are in direct full moonlight. 65 degrees lets say. Rays reflecting from the sun off the moon to us at night. Well if you go in the shade from the moonlight what does it drop to? 50 degrees? Cooler? NOOOOOOO! It gets hotter. The complete opposite of the Sunlight. So how the F is it reflecting sunlight when it has oppossite properties?
Try another experiment. Get a light source and shine it on a ball. You cant light a sphere with another light source without leaving a hot spot. The Moon is not lit from the sun. There is not only no evidence that it does but it is impossible for it to be.

   Well how come when I'm at the beach I see boats go away and disappear bottom first over the curve of the earth? You don't. Its called a vanishing point. You know you can't see forever right? You aren't Superman even though Bill Nye asks if the earth is flat how come I can't see Spain from the East Coast of the USA??? It's absurd but even better let's prove it doesn't go over a curve. Watch that boat again and as it dissapears bottom first OVER THE CURVE as they say pull out a good zoom camera and guess what? You can bring the whole ship back. Watch it go over the curve again and whip out a stronger zoom say binoculars and guess what you bring it all back again!! Use your mind. Is it really going over a ball if you can zoom in and bring it back? Of course not. You should be zooming in on a hump of water. 

   The navy uses weapons with line of sight laser targeting up to more than 60 miles. Submarines. From inches off the surface of the sea. How is it line of sight if the earth curves? There would be like half a mile of curve in the way. How would a rail gun shoot a projectile like 100 miles in a straight line?

    This is a deep topic I have been researching since 2014 so I have a lot to add to follow this up but I want to keep this one not too long and get you interested. If you have to cuss me out or call me stupid or insult my education that obviously means you have no reasonable rebuttal.

   This is all stuff you can see for yourself. EVERY PICTURE OF EARTH IS FAKE. Its even ADMITTED they photoshop them. You can see the continents change size and even see cloned copy and pasted clouds on the "photos". Well if those are faked to that degree isn't this worth looking into? I have posted some for you.

    Let's recap. All the pics of earth from space are fake CGI. All the pics of Satellites in space are CGI and these are obvious. Look them up. Nothing but cartoons. It's pretty insulting really. They hoaxed Apollo and The Challenger Disaster and the ISS is a complete joke. But nooooooo they'd never lie about the shape of the earth. Even though the images of that are also fake. Where is the logic in that reasoning?

   Well what's the motive? Well many answers really, but some tougher for others to believe whether you are faith based or not but how about lets start with money. NASA gets 20 billion a year, yes 53 MILLION PER DAY to fake outer space. They control navigation, GPS, Maps and they could be hiding more land or even bigger secrets like how we got here or by whom. 

   Planes going east and west should take vastly different times since one is going with and one against the spin of the earth. If the earth is spinning 1000 MPH eastward and you are flying east at 500mph how would you even reach your stop? It would come up behind you. And a trip westward would take a fraction of the time cuz you and the Earth would be racing towards each other!  Well here comes another bullshit argument that the Earth's atmosphere is rotating with the earth. Let's pretend it is for a second. So what about a plane flying to land on a north to south runway? Are you trlling me they can land while the earth spins sideways at 1000 MPH??? Clearly if you believe that you must believe they are not just extremely skilled at that part of flying, but there surely is a procedure to compensate for the spin. Well there absolutely isn't. I will post some material here. Interviews from pilots and a few beginner videos you should see. This is my first blog on Flat Earth and it's been three years so I don't go on forever I will stop now. I will respond to comments. Please share this. Have an open mind and just think. If you can't trust NASA and can't trust school, can you not trust your senses more than them?? I assure you it is not a crazy idea in fact I tried to debunk this for about a full year before realizing not only does the globe lack proof....IT HAS NONE. You can prove the earth is flat and does not move in hundreds of ways. Literally. 
   Pictures they present of REAL EARTH from Space Are posted below as well as their photoshopping blunder. Pics at impossible distances on a ball. Pics of the sun I TOOK which clearly is not 93 Million Miles away and I will add a few beginner videos to ease you into this. Please just go in order. This is not bullshit. you have been programmed to think it is though.

   I will be doing a radio show on this soon right here on The Dose Of Reality Radio Show and building a few in depth Flat Earth pages. For now I hope you enjoyed this blog. This is for beginners mostly but no worries, you veterans of the Flat Earth Movement my webpages will have much more updated content. Use this to get people interested please. Please share this link if you like this blog.

Brian S. Staveley   www.TheRealNewsOnline.com

  

 NASA's Most used official pic now Blue Marble 2.0. Admittedlly Photoshopped by Rob Simmon Of NASA. Have a listen yourself.

Clearly photshopped clouds and weather and it is even admitted he added them on and even colored the oceans as he sees fit and it is photoshopped cuz it has to be. Fact is ALL the pics of earth from space are indeed fake.

You believe this is real???

The Chicago Skyline which should be under 2400 feet of curvature clearly visible. Taken by Josh Nowicki but called a mirage by the news. Mirages are upside down by the way. Complete nonsense. No you are just seeing Chicago becuase it is across from you and you aren't on a ball!!

Listen to this liar! Want another example?? Jenna Fredo took pics of Toronto from New York and The Skydome shoulda been completely under the curve. They are laughing at our ignorance.
​Listen to this weatherman's bullshit.

Now Jenna's Video showing the Skydome. And she even uses METABUNK which is a BS site like Snopes they have a "curvature calculator" that even knocks the number down more than it should to explain away what you can see when you shouldn't and she still beats it. Beats it to really prove a point. Then Mick West comes on Joe Rogan's show and straight up says its a mirage! Here we go again...He also says look the Skydome is upside down. as you are looking at everything totally upright!!

Official NASA pic called Earth Rising from the moon. CLEARLY CGI

A Great description how your eyes work and why things appear to vanish over the horizon.

    Joe Rogan used to be a voice for the moon hoax. They got to him. When he had Neil Degrasse Tyson on his show and did a complete 180. The only guy ever to go back on the moon hoax after seeing the evidence. Now every few weeks it is just a flat earth bashing show by Rogan.  Don't trust these clowns. Always use your own judgement. Don't trust anyone. Including me. Do your own research. This is just a good start for you. If a particulr person here doesn't resonate with you, you don't have to listen to them. There are so many people putting out content now but these are some great ones to start with.

On the right hand side of this page are links to our older blogs with keywords for them. Comments for this blog are just below. Comments are open. Please just be respectful. All opinions are welcome as long as you actually read it all and give it an honest thought.
​Thank you.

        The Everything Is Fake Guy

      About 4 years ago I stumbled onto a documentary called Loose Change. For me as it was for so many others this movie made me realize 9/11 was not anything like what we were told. This is not going to be a blog on 9/11 though. Stick with me for a minute.  After spending a few years investing all my time into looking into 9/11 as much as possible it eventually became evident that the whole event was a massive hoax/psy op. Not so much the "False Flag" I thought it was when I first "Awoke" For those that want to learn more about the 9/11 Hoax this link is a great place to start. http://www.therealnewsonline.com/guest-james-fetzer-evidence.html  Anyways moving along.

    After realizing 9/11 was a hoax it opens the door to a whole new concept. Its not whether official stories are correct and its not people were killed in a false flag. It's that everything we learned from BOTH SIDES of the coin was bullcrap. Made to have heated debates. Rabbit trails setup on purpose to lead people no where. Mistake done on purpose to confuse people etc...

    This is the general practice nowadays. From 9/11 to Sandy Hook, The Moon Hoax and much more. HOWEVER you can NOT throw everything under the "It's fake" Umbrella. That presents a slew of new problems. It desensitizes you to things happening that you should be pissed about. People expect me to just jump aboard everyone's statements calling something a Hoax. It does NOT work that way. You need to be very careful before calling something a hoax. If I was to just join along everytime someone called something a hoax without seriously looking into it, I would lack credibility. People will and sometimes do say that I'm the guy that thinks everything is fake.  That is not the truth. Some of my own listeners get aggrevated when I do a show on something and don't call it fake right away.

      If we threw everything under the "It's All Fake Umbrella" Then what is the point in investigating anything?? There wouldn't be. I've come across this in 9/11. There are a group of people and most of you know who, that say EVERYTHING is 100% fake on that day. They say there is ZERO real video. This maybe is true. I know that MOST of it is fake CGI video or scripted lines. However some of these people won't even let you discuss the possibility of real video on 9/11. So if you are just going to say everything is fake without looking seriously into it you are making a big mistake. KEY evidence will be ignored and overall you become completely desensitized to it.

      Yes I am the guy that says 9/11 and Sandy Hook were hoaxes. I don't mind taking heat for that at all. People that disagree all have not spent any serious time looking into it. People would rather call me names and stuff than actually debate any of my main points. Yes I called 9/11 fake but it took me a couple years of full time investigating to come to that conclussion.

     In closing it is fine to think something is a hoax until proven real. That makes perfect sense to me since the media has lost all credibility and so many of the biggest events of my lifetime have been complete hoaxes. You'd be foolish to not entertain that idea! Anyways even though right off the bat I think something is a hoax, I still pour thru the evidence and try to prove to myself if it's a hoax or not. That being said I don't mention to skeptics that something is a hoax until I am 99 percent sure. I like to call things a hoax responsibly. More often than not HUGE stories in the news are manufactured with an agenda. Often the stories we are told are there to distract us from something more important. Before you schoff at this blog and call me nuts, anti American, etc... Why don't you try to prove me wrong??? People will never take that challenge. It's easier for them to call you names, character assassinate, etc. They will recite the official story over n over yet they will never bother to even look into those claims and see if they are real. It's quite pathetic actually. Anyone can go onto a newspaper or watch a tv program and recite the so called facts. That is not researching and if the media is lying to you what purpose does that serve?? Obviously that info is bogus!

      Our website specializes in these media fakery type events. You can find a ton of these issues on our website. Completely broken down and I feel they are UNDEBUNKABLE. Check us out. We have hundreds of radio shows in our archive which we aired here. We have tons of very informative blogs and much more.

     Remember this if nothing else. The media does not work for you. They are NEVER going to expose the truth about some big secret governemnt lies. They will float out fairly useless examples of governemnt corruption. People seem to think they are obligated to tell you the truth. That is a rather naive way to think. The media runs hoaxes all the time. Not everything is a hoax but more often than not it is. Just be sure before you make that claim, PLEASE. Take it from me, The F'n Everything is fake guy. Most things are fake but be vigilant in your research into those events. IF you call soemthing fake in the first few days and end up being wrong, you will never be able to live that down. People will say you have no credibilty at all and you call everything fake.

Thank you for reading guys,
Brian S Staveley
Founder/Creator of The Real News Online & The Dose Of Reality Radio Show.

Before I begin, I want to say that my country of birth has more than it's fair share of problems. All "first world" countries do. NZ( New Zealand) is absolutely no exception to that rule. New Zealand is NOT the safe, clean and green, paradise island at the bottom of the world, in the South Pacific that somehow it is still regarded as overseas. We have terrible issues with poverty, off the wall house prices, child abuse, violent crime against tourists, racism, a very high cost of living (the war to erradicate the middle class is definately alive and well here), a checkered history with regard to "indiginous" rights, and so on. Our self defence laws are not adequate.  The media and so on are just like they are in the USA, so I am not on any kind of crusade to Yank bash here, or lament our superiority. I do however believe, we have one of the better police forces in the world. What is happening with the cops in America is very hard to fathom for us in down under land. Getting murdered by a cop here really isn't a credible threat.

Firstly, I will outline the major differences of our police force to that of the USA;
Our officers do NOT carry a firearm on their person. They do carry tazers however that is more recently, up until a few years ago all they carried was battons (billy clubs) and mace at the most.
Our laws around alcohol consumption are a lot more relaxed and realistic.
An independant authority handles the police complaints processes, it is not done internally.
You are treated like a human being and with the presumption of innocence at all times. The police are generally friendly and helpful.

The police will taxi you home if you are lost or drunk (but not disorderly) rather than harrass you about what you are doing on the streets at night. Cops will not pull up beside you at 4am if they don't suspect you or have a valid reason of any wrongdoing on your behalf. At least this has never happened to me and as I don't drive I walk the streets as much as or more than anyone and it would have happened to me if it was a regular occurance.

Gang members outnumber police officers and have acccess to far more firearms and weapons, yet the police and gangs have a cordial relationship for the most part and do work together at times.
Police records are wiped when you turn 17, unless for very serious offending.
Being drunk in public is not a crime for someone of any age. Only being drunk combined with disorderly. So it is much harder for the police to abuse a phoney law to lock you up for no reason.
The drinking age is 18 across the board, and 16 for sexual consent. It doesn't vary from territory to territory. 18 is a more realistic age for drinking. You can vote or fight a war so why not?
The police exercise discretion and take a more common sense approach to policing.

For example, in my country of New Zealand, a more common sense approach is taken toward road policing. You are treated more like a human being and less like a robot. I hear from my American friends there are stupid unrealistc laws around alcohol and driving, for example no open containers anywhere in the automobile. In New Zealand there is no such law. Even the driver can be driving on the highway drinking any alcoholic beverage he/she likes and nothing can be done, as long as the drivers BAC level is under the prescribed drink driving limit. The passengers can do whatever they want, drink as much as they want, and why not, they are not operating the car. To me this is an example of being treated more like an adult and with the presumption of innocence and the benefit of the doubt, something you don't get so much of with USA policing.

I don't condone drunk driving, however I do think the issue is way overblown. Most of the time it's too subjective to tell how much % the alcohol was actually to blame, it's usually only a contributing factor at most. Reckless driving is more often than not the culprit. Blood alcohol limits are unrealistic as people have different tollerances, it depends on what you have eaten, and so on. A field sobriety test should be the default method used. Some of my friends could have 8 beers in an hour and I would trust them driving me in a car, others I would take their keys after only 3 or 4. BAC is a one sized fits all aproach that is unrealistic. NZ does adopt BAC also but our limit is more realistic and allows you to drive after 4 or 5 beers, the penalties are also more the higher you are over, so punishments are stagnated, only a fine will be issued if you are only marginally over the lower level as can accidentally happen, and loss of licence might occur only with blatant offending. And although people don't like to admit it, your base driving ability does play quite a big role. Good drivers don't tend to have accidents (that they can prevent, sober or not, anyway), and get any professional motor racing driver blackout drunk, he would still probably never crash the car, just in the same way as Michael Jordon could have 30 beers and still go out there and play a better basketball game than even most professionals could. I feel our laws go closer to acknowledging this fact by giving more of a safety net.

Laws are also more relaxed at sporting events. You certainly do not have to go through an x-ray machine or get wanded. Only at the airport will that ever happen to you in this country. Bags are not madatorily searched at most sporting stadiums. Your not supposed to bring your own alcohol in, however it's easy enough to sneak in and they don't crack down on it, they focus more on troublemakers, and acknowledge that they have bigger fish to fry. You can sit in the bleachers drinking your own store bought alcohol and it's unlikely you will be identified or removed as long as it isn't too blatant and your drinking the same brands they sell at the game. There aren't even police at most games, just event security.

New Zealand schools and Universities and colleges don't have police officers or even their own security guards (outside operating hours might be different) for the most part, it isn't needed in most cases. 

I'm not sure what the correlation is between armed police and unarmed police, and crime. England does not arm their cops either and their crime rate is high, though I don't know if attacks on officers are common or not. Closer to home Australian police are armed and a bit rougher around the edges than here. Attacks on them are not common nor citizens being killed unlawfully. What I do know is that the USA has had hundreds of citizens unlawfully killed by their police in the last year or so, yet England, New Zealand, Australia etc. have had so much fewer, even for head of population it is much higher in USA than anywhere, scarilly so. I don't pretend to have the solution.
Our police aren't perfect. Far from it. But they do at least treat you more like human beings. They walk softly, talk softly, and yet don't carry the big stick unless they really need it. Yet rarely does a cop get killed on the beat here. A few have happened in the last 5 or 6 years but before than none for over 20 years. People in America just can't fathom the idea of an unarmed police force, but it may be the lesser of two evils. Being killed by a policeman simply isn't a credible threat here unless you shoot at them or point your gun directly at them. That fact alone makes NZ a very appealing place to live for a lot of my American friends, things with USA cops are getting that bad.

I'm not sure any police force in the world totally lives up to the motto of to serve and protect, and i'm not even sure they can, or even if they should have to try and protect us, but I feel our cops at least come closer to that motto. They aren't perfect. They still don't get the same sentences as regular citizens. They are still too self protecting. They focus too much on revenue gathering quotas. They still view overseas cops as a brotherhood and try too hard to impress the big boys at the FBI when it's their chance to shine on the world stage, such as in cases like the Kim Dotcom arrest in 2013 for example, sending helicopters and over 50 armed officers to arrest 3 computer nerds in a mansion in a plush isolated country getaway. But they aren't above the law either. A police officer here who killed someone in circumstances like Fergusson would most likely never ever wear the badge again and go to jail for a long time. The badge at least stands for something here. Police officers treat you with respect. They are the ones saying sir, please and thank you. They will give you the benefit of the doubt more times than not, where you would be cuffed and booked in the USA. You don't feel like a prisoner in your own airport here. They do not harrass people, pull you over for no reason and so on. They are not ruthless individuals on a power trip who are trained to shoot first, and ask questions later. They are not accepting washed up military recruits in their training academies. They are not out looking for trouble or making it when they can't find any, at least not on a broad scale. For the most part, don't fuck with them, and they wont fuck with you. And thats the way it should be. To serve and protect.

I love America and I love Americans. But i'm not sure I could ever live there with the police force as it stands currently. I'm not sure I could tollerate being treated like a prisoner in my country of residence. I couldn't tollerate it, and nobody should ever have to.

James Sloan
www.TheRealNewsOnline.Com

                                                        
 This blog may be a bit premature. It will be tough possibly to withhold the test of time as this story is still developing. New evidence or theories could come out tomorrow but seeing as EVERYONE is talking about this now, I feel the need to write my thoughts on the Ebola Scare. If you did not know we also did a radio show on this which I will link at the bottom but in just the 3 days since the show things have changed so this will be the most current piece.

      I'll start by telling you where we are at. It is October 18th 2014. I am not sure of the exact date that Ebola was first reported here in the US but I am guessing it is still less than 2 weeks ago. So far we have had the one fatality here. Mr. Duncan. The colored gentleman from Dallas Texas. He so far is the only one here that has passed away and that was within the past 7 days or so. Right now there is hype in all cities across the country. Stories keep coming out of scares that never amount to anything at all. The so called "Second Nurse" is now making headlines. She is allegedly aboard a cruise ship right now. Sound absurd? Well, it is and I will get back to that. Now you know about where we are as far as the stage of the "Outbreak".

    Right off the bat people have a theory of what they think. I will tell you the most popular ones and where I stand. I right off the bat hear something like this and think it's bullcrap. Of course you can never just assume everything is fake and you need to look at every event and every piece of evidence on its own. There are many that feel as I do. There are others that think it's real and a big danger and intenionally let in for population control. There are others that think it's real and used to push a vaccine and on n on n on. My first stance was it is a real disease but there is no out break right now. They will probably use the panic to push a vaccine for it. I have already seen a bit of evidence of that. It turns out the motive for this might be much deeper than most of us ever imagined. First before we get to the motive let me show you why I STRONGLY believe this is a hoax. There is a ton of evidence supporting this.

    First we have pictures from the apartment where Duncan died. There were people there for a few days all decked out in Hazmat suits. There were many photos of them in and out of the apartment. Taping off his vehicle. Carrying out items for disposal, etc... Well low and behold out emerges a picture of a Judge from Dallas with NO PROTECTIVE GEAR ON going in and out of the apartment! He also has a couple of people with him with NO GEAR! The mainstream media writes this off as "Arrogant Judge Refuses To Wear Protective Gear"  Like C'mon! On the mainstream sites people are so  brainwashed and so unable to think for themselves the comments read something like this "What an idiot!"  "OMG Someone grab that guy"  " I Hope he gets what he deserves"  And here I am reading this ready to smash my head through the wall so I comment "Hey Did you guys ever think maybe he doesn't have protective gear on because there is no danger? " It's like do people even think for themselves at all. Here is a picture of this judge. No he's not an idiot. He just knows he isn't going to get sick. I'd say he is an idiot for getting caught BUT I tend to think mistakes like this are done on purpose to create different theories and spawn in-fighting.

  So I suppose we are just going to look at this and think nothing of it? Everyone but him and his people were wearing full Hazmat suits and the next day after this too, so it's not like he showed up just as it became safe and others had not undressed yet.
It doesn't end there! In the beginning of this blog I mentioned how now the headlines are the nurse being sick, well look what we have around her transport to Atlanta! Another guy with NO GEAR ON!! This time CNN responed. So what did they say? Did they say the area became safe? HAHA. Not even close. They said something that never mind it being a viable excuse, it doesn't make any sense at all! CNN Said "He was the director because the people in the suits had low visibility"
I swear to god, that is all they said and left it at that. Again comments on CNN and other mainstream sites, posts, and Twitter pages all talk about how dumb the guy is but no one is getting that it's a hoax!!

  There is A LOT MORE showing this hoax and then we will get into the motives which is much deeper than simply fear or vaccines. A few days ago a few videos were released in the mainstream news. One video is simply amazing. It is set in Spain and they are transporting an Ebola patient in a containment unit sealed off to prevent contamination. Only thing is the containment unit is EMPTY!!! No one is in it. They are also carrying an IV bag on the OUTSIDE of it for show. They are moving one patient ALLEGEDLY and they have a 3 ambulance and police car escort making a big scene but the unit is EMPTY. This whole video is good EXCEPT the commentary is a little over the top but if you go to about 2 min and 30 seconds in you can watch this farce!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajV4LqShAcw

Can this get any sillier? Yes it can. In this next video AIRED on CNN you will see a man playing sick and falling out the back of an ambulance with some of the worst acting since Robbie Parker! If that isn't convincing enough keep watching because right after him a little boy comes running and then just plays dead like a 5 year old playing cops n robbers with his friends! He is playing like he is deathly ill. It's pathetic propaganda!! If you watch just another min n half til about 8 minutes you will see a man playing sick outside a makeshift hospital. Not only is he acting, wearing the trademark bright green Ebola shirt. He is not laying in front of the hospital. They literally made a sign to throw over this grimey looking place to make you believe that is what the hospitals in Africa look like! I will show you what the REAL HOSPITAL it is portraying looks like. It looks better than any hospital in my city.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ZonCVRQ-2s

Still think this is real? I hope not. Now I will tell you the possible motives, then provide more evidence backing it. This theory comes from Jim Stone who interviewed someone from Liberia named Nana Kwame. After releasing this a few days ago there is clearly a discrediting campaign taking place againg Kwame! There is a fake Facebook page setup where the person potraying it is making a bad name for Kwame. We will get back to that but here is what Nana Kwame said. It's much better if I just put the exact words here rather than paraphrasing. 
Nana Kwame wrote:


People in the Western World need to know what's happening here in West Africa. THEY ARE LYING!!! "Ebola" as a virus does NOT Exist and is NOT "Spread". The Red Cross has brought a disease to 4 specific countries for 4 specific reasons and it is only contracted by those who receive treatments and injections from the Red Cross. That is why Liberians and Nigerians have begun kicking the Red Cross out of their countries and reporting in the news the truth. Now bear with me:
REASONS:

Most people jump to "depopulation" which is no doubt always on the mind of the West when it comes to Africa. But I assure you Africa can NEVER be depopulated by killing 160 people a day when thousands are born per day. So the real reasons are much more tangible.

Reason 1: This vaccine implemented sickness being "called" Ebola was introduced into West Africa for the end goal of getting troops on the ground in Nigeria, Liberia, and Sierra Leone. If you remember America was just trying to get into Nigeria for "Boko Haram" #BULLSHIT but that fell apart when Nigerians started telling the truth. There ARE NO GIRLS MISSING. Global support fell through the floor, and a new reason was needed to get troops into Nigeria and steal the new oil reserves they have discovered.

Reason 2: Sierra Leone is the World's Largest Supplier of Diamonds. For the past 4 months they have been on strike, refusing to provide diamonds due to horrible working conditions and slave pay. The West will not pay a fair wage for the resources because the idea is to keep these people surviving on rice bags and foreign aid so that they remain a source of cheap slave labor forever. A reason was also needed to get troops on the ground in Sierra Leone to force an end to the diamond miners strikes. This is not the first time this has been done. When miners refuse to work troops are sent in and even if they have to kill and replace them all, the only desire is to get diamonds back flowing out of the country.

Of course to launch multiple campaigns to invade these countries separately would be way too fishy. But something like "Ebola" allows access to an entire area simultaneously...

Reason 3: In addition to stealing Nigerian oil, and forcing Sierra Leone back to mining, troops have also been sent in to FORCE vaccinations (Deadly "Ebola" Poison) onto those Africans who are not foolish enough to take them willingly.
3000 troops are being sent in to make sure that this "poison" continues to spread, because again it is only spread through vaccination. As more and more news articles are released as they have been in Liberia, informing the populous of the US lies and manipulation, more and more Africans are refusing to visit the Red Cross. Troops will force these vaccinations upon the people to ensure the visible appearance of an Ebola pandemic. In addition to this they will protect the Red Cross from the Liberians and Nigerians who have been rightfully ejecting them from their countries.

Reason 4: Last but not least, the APPEARANCE of this Ebola "pandemic" (should Americans not catch on) will be used to scare the countless millions into taking an "Ebola vaccine" which in reality is the pandemic. Already they have started with stories of how it has been brought to the U.S. and has appeared in Dallas, how white doctors were cured but black infected are not being allowed to be treated, etc.

ALL that will do is make blacks STRIVE to get the vaccine, because it appears that the "cure" is being held back from blacks. They will run out in droves to get it and then there will be serious problems. With all we have seen revealed about vaccines this year you would think we learned our lesson. All I can do is hope so, Because they rely on our ignorance to complete their agendas.

Ask yourself: If Ebola really was spread from person to person, instead of controlled spread through vaccination - then WHY would the CDC and the US Government continue to allow flights in and out of these countries with absolutely no regulation, Or At All? We have got to start thinking and sharing information globally because they do not give the true perspective of the people who live here in West Africa. They are lying for their own benefit and there aren't enough voices out there with a platform to help share our reality. Hundreds of thousands have been killed, paralyzed and disabled by these and other "new" vaccines all over the world and we are finally becoming aware of it. Now what will we do with all this information?

      After reading the above information which credit for goes to Jim Stone I was pretty convinced this was close to the truth. I should mention I have come across Jim Stone on some other touchy subjects and he was definitely on the right side of the fence. You know you can't totally trust anyone in this game but until proven otherwise I consider him a pretty reliable source. I had already thought it was a hoax and thought it was to push vaccines but I had no idea of the Diamond Mine Workers in Sierra Leonne going on strike. Obama just before I read Jim Stone's piece actually mentioned putting troops on the ground in West Africa to "Contain" the outbreak. In my mind when I read that I figured it was an excuse to position troops there to steal natural resources but had no idea specifically what. So Kwame is saying that the Ebola is NOT communicable and the only people with it are those being forced to take these vaccines by the troops. Very interesting. This would make me believe it is a man made disease. Made in a laboratory. If it is only passable through vaccines, if I am to beleive that then I kind of have to think it is man made. So it looks like the population control people are right in some regard. It is population control BUT not for us in America. The people who think it is to steal resources are right. It's to speed up the diamond miners who are on strike as we speak. The people who say it is a hoax are also partly right since it poses no danger to us here in America.

  So why go on this dog and pony show here in the United States? Well how us are they going to gain our support for more military action? If we think people here are at risk of dying then we as a whole will support military intervention of some sort to "contain" the Ebola.
Here is the last video I want you to check out. Watch the whole thing though. This is important all the way through. Listen to the villagers speak. It doesn't take much reading between the lines to see they are saying exactly what Jim Stone was. In this video you will also see the REAL HOSPITAL that man was said to be lying in front of! It looks NOTHING like the deception they showed us. Classic media bullcrap!  Listen to these people though without saying it word for word they are telling you what Jim Stone told you. Even about Ebola being a hoax and the only ones getting sick are the ones getting vaccines. They even killed 8 workers for trying to give them shots. Of course the media spins it but that is why. They were defending their lives.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-KhAEbu8wU&list=PLmVRSZ67Jg7LwzJEcU0zy_Q6jIcYRiNAQ

Where does this go from here? My guess is as good as yours but please spread this around and any other information you can to let people here in America know what is going on and hopefully they will NOT support ore military action, more murder, more stealing people's resources. It's on you now to not care if people cal, you crazy, or whatever insults they want to throw. LEt them know this is bullcrap and the media is lying thru their teeth. This is a good story to get people to realize the media is not their for your best interest!
Here is the link to Jim Stone's Rebuttal to the people saying he has been debunked.

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?75986-Jim-Stone-Debunking-The-Nana-Kwame-Debunk

At the bottom of this article I have included links to the radio show we did last Wednesday 10-15-2014 on The Ebola Scare. This was BEFORE I had ALL of this information though. The audio is from my radio show which I broadcast from this site. Dose Of Reality Radio is hosted by myself (Brian S Staveley), Justin Cooke, and James Sloan. If you would like to receive an email notification when a new blog is posted or a new radio show is announced simply drop your email address on the form for email alerts. There is a form on the homepage and the radio page. No email confirmation even needed. Just leave your email and your done.

Thank you,
Brian S Staveley
www.TheRealNewsOnline.com

Lots of Credit goes to Jim Stone ,the original publishers of the videos I provided, and any researchers before me that helped share this information.

   It's Okay To Be Wrong 
  by Brian S Staveley


     It's okay to be wrong. Sounds simple doesn't it? Well for some it is the ultimate hurdle for them. It's the one thing stopping them from even having a chance to see the truth. this is regarding any event. Pick one. The hurdle is the same with most people. They are too stubborn, too embarrassed or a combination of both to admit they were once wrong. Does this apply to you? Are you so set in your beliefs that often you will not entertain other's ideas or theories surrounding them? It's a very counter productive atitude to have. It's the media and the goverment's biggest weapon. 

   Once you are able to admit you were wrong it's actually enlightning. After that you lift the floodgates in your brain and you start absorbing all sorts of information. Information that has always been there but you were too stubborn to look. Now you are looking. That is a positive thing. Listen we have all been wrong. There is nothing wrong with admitting it. Yes we have all been fooled, duped or whatever you want to call it on a grand scale. To the likes of something you could have never imagined before opening up your mind.

   Do you tell people they are wrong without looking? How do you know they are wrong? Is it because what they say sounds so absolutely against the norm? Well your norm may be false. It may have been painted for you. Hear people out always. What they are saying may actually be more logical than the status quo. Even people that seem to not be in the same line of thinking as you may have valuable nuggets of information. They just may be presented in a different light. Don't attack an idea without knowing what its al about first. If you call someone wrong over and over but will not specifically tell them what they are wrong about, it makes you look bad. It makes it look like you simply don't know the material well enough to have an intelligent debate on it. Most often this is the case. Before you call someone a conspiracy theorist you should realize what a conspiracy is. When two or more people conspire to do something you have a conspiracy. They happen all the time in all walks of life. It is a deragatory term meant to throw anyone who questions the status quo under one umbrella as wacky. Do you know who the biggest conspiracy theorists really are? The news. All the BS conspiracy theories they push and sadly most people believe them cuz they have media credentials. Haaaaa. The media is not credible at all.

   A couple weeks ago someone who is a skeptic said to me "Well where can I go to get the truth?"  I told her "There is no one plce that is going to serve you the truth." It will always be mixed in with lies and you have to use discernemnt to pick the truth out amongst the lies. The key is to thoroughly look over everything on your own, trust no one and follow no one. That is an easy trap to fall into once someone has given you a lot of good information you have never seen before. You still need to be careful. This is how they bait you in. To people that have complete trust in the news. I feel bad for you. I really Do. Hopefully one day you will realize how much they have an agenda but until then you should stop attacking people looking for the truth amongst the lies. We are the smart ones by not trusting them. When you attack one of us with no facts and just spew what you have seen on the news you make my point.

    Everyone pass this on to "truthers" and skeptics alike. Hopefully it will get thru to the more stubborn ones. If you are one of the more stubborn ones, why? Why not open your mind? Are you scared? 

JUST ADDED ON Tuesday October 21st 2014

The Obama Czar to Ebola said our BIGGEST PROBLEM IS OVERPOPULATION. Now if any of us suggested that we would be labeled nuts. What he said just further shows what i wrote in my Ebola Blog here about the troops being sent to Liberia to force the Diamond Mine Workers back to work and they were force vaccinating the workers and thats how the Ebola Was Spreading doesnt seem so out of line now does it? This guy who is the EBOLA CZAR is really saying our biggest problem is over population???  If any person alone suggests they may have an agenda like that people call them nuts, batshit crazy, etc. but when someone in a position to maybe help push something like that along says it, no one bats an eye.
What is wrong with this picture?

http://alternative-news.tk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Ebola-Czar-Ron-Klain-Says-quotOverpopulationquot-Top-Concern.mp4?_=2

Brian S Staveley
www.TheRealNewsOnline.com

Eternity;

Note, this blog is my personal opinion about the topic of eternal existence. They are my opinions based on my personal experiences and those of others in my life, and my personal research, logical deduction and discernment. I know for a fact from discussions with Brian and Justin they agree with me on many of these issues, but I delve quite deep into the topic here, and it must be noted that these opinions in their totality are of the writer and not necessarily the views of real news online, though I believe strongly in what I have written. It was my decision to put this disclaimer on, this is not censorship, but this is the most subjective topic we have dealt with, and there will simply never be wholesale agreement on this topic. Although, the same could also be said of everything we talk about on here.

We are eternal. Our body is merely a vehicle for our existence on this version of the earth plane. Once we die our spirit (soul and mind) leaves the body and moves on. There is overwhelming empirical evidence of an afterlife, and of our eternal existence, both before we chose to come here and after we leave, but so few truly understand this because of the focus on burden of proof, the science vs. religion, the creation vs. evolution debate.

Throughout my life there are many things I could never quite comprehend. I was always open minded, which is no surprise as to why I became a "conspiracy theorist". But that was much later in life. The most pondered question in history is without a doubt "what happens to us when we die?". The second would be I assume "are we alone in the universe?". Though there is some parallel between the two questions, many wrongly assume we will never know the answer to one or both. The truth is we already know the answer to what happens to us when we die. Our mind knows, but our brain has to learn. It is a pre requisite of coming here.

Most of conventional religion focuses around a soul, a heaven and a hell, but in spirituality you hear just as much about the mind and the spirit as you do about the soul. The central idea is the mind and brain being separate. The brain is a receiver, a learning computer of sorts. It is responsible for all our cognitive functions, sending messages to the body to move etc. But our mind is a far greater, separate entity, our mind exists outside of our physical body. Most people have heard of spirits and souls, but only choose to use the term "mind" as an interchangeable way to refer to the brain. They simply never give it much more thought than that.

I was never partial to religion growing up, but neither Atheism. Atheism seems to take the approach of "when we die we die that is it", and that conventional religion where a Deity creates and rules over all of us is the only alternative explanation anyone has ever come up with, and to "debunk that notion". It's easy to identify as agnostic, and I effectively did for a long time, but one day it just seemed like too easy a way out. Not that it is a cop out per say, it is a quite reasonable stance to take on the issue given the amount of lies we have been told. However I’ve never tolerated unanswered questions before, so why with this one, the greatest question of all? Just put it to the back of the brain. "We can't know, no one knows. We were obviously not meant to know". "It can't be proved". I only liked the sound of Christianity because it seemed the nicer option of the two. The word Atheist was only made known to me as an older teenager. That word was simply never used in Religious Instruction, or anywhere else in the school curriculum.

Not meant to know? Doesn't that imply that there is something to know, and that it is being kept from us?

To many of us atheism is a dirty word. It never inspired me in the slightest. Why would anyone be an Atheist? You can't prove there isn't a God. Even they admit that. You cannot prove a negative is their answer. The burden of proof is on others to prove there is a God or Gods, or an afterlife.

That philosophy never sat well with me. First of all, we don't "know" where we came from. If you admit we don't know where we come from, and how we got here, how can you say for sure you know where we aren't going? How can you proclaim to know absolutely that there is nothing after death? Have you died to find out, and if so, how is it that you are among the living to claim this? No, Atheism is a logical fallacy.

The burden of proof is not on anyone. It is not a burden of proof issue. If anything though, Atheists ignore a lot more than even staunch religious people do. There are numerous things that point to a greater existence; dreams, lucid dreams, experience with spirits, out of body experiences, near death experiences, clairvoyants, psychics, ghosts, haunted houses, astrology, Ouija boards, Séances, coincidences, irony etc. At least religion for the most part acknowledges these phenomena, though they do describe it as dangerous and to be avoided. Atheists basically dismiss all of it as nonsense, telling all the millions and millions of people who have experienced it first hand that they must be either wrong or mistaken. Telling somebody else that their independant life defining experience was wrong. What could possibly be more arrogant and presumptuous than that? It's one thing to cast doubt or aspersion, to say it could be either or, that is constructive, to tell someone they are wrong. That’s fucking bullshit. Think about it, if even just one of the people who has had any of those experiences is correct, Atheism is already disproved. Could so many be mistaken? Though in reality strictly speaking atheism is simply the rejection of a supreme Deity, not a spiritual afterlife, but pretty much all Atheists simply focus on disproving religion and poking holes in the bible, so they reject afterlife. "When you die you die that’s it". What if there was another alternative?It is NOT a burden of proof issue. One thing about many Atheists that always frustrated me was the presumed use of science to disprove an afterlife. The claim is that science has answered the questions for us. But think of many of the greatest or regarded as the greatest scientists ever, Albert Einstein, Sir Isaac Newton, Nikola Tesla, even inventors like Tesla (Tesla was a physicist also) Thomas Edison, other scientists like Galileo, Nicholas Copernicus, none of them identified as Atheists, in fact they resented when they were called as such. It would be a stretch to call all of them creationists, but many quotes attributed to them tended to pointed closer to that direction. Einstein remarked like many of us, the position of the earth in the solar system, a little to the left, we burn up, a little to the right and we freeze to death, the impossibility of a "non created universe". He also expressed an admiration for Buddhism. The conditions being so perfect for life, the odds are infinitesimal it could happen by chance. Sir Issac Newton was a Christian, as were a lot of people of his time. Tesla is perhaps the greatest inventor/scientist of all time, he was very spiritual, saying that he felt there was a place in the center of the universe where knowledge is stored, our brains are receivers, but indicating that our mind exists outside our physical body, as per spirituality.

Whatever the case, science has not disproved anything related to these issues. There are many scientists who believe in an afterlife. There are many who do not. Though this hurts a lot of people, it's an issue that is BEYOND science. Science is great, but limited, like everything in this earth plane. This is not nor has it ever been the kind of thing you can prove in a laboratory with an experiment, though there are some indicators. In my view old school science accepted there was an afterlife, but that is an opinion. The science is never settled. Yes Science tends to be the field with the highest amount of Atheists. I know in this writing I am dismissing a lot of conventional meaningless coincidence to explain things, but it doesn't mean they don't exist. It could be a random fact too. Dentists for example have the highest suicide rate of any profession. But can you really garner any conclusion from that, or demonstrate a cogent cause and effect process?There are indicators though. One of the most basic accepted laws of science is that energy can neither be created nor destroyed, only transformed. Another is for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. How are these laws compatible with death being an ultimate end? These are accepted laws of science. I'm not even saying they are correct. But for those whom use Science to disprove afterlife, that seems a contradiction in terms. Although it is one of the lesser pieces of evidence, it has also been established that immediately upon death, the human body has been shown to lose weight. Not a great deal, but around 21 grams. There seems to be no biological explanation for this, and it has been attributed to a soul or spirit leaving the corpse. Of course it is often debated as to the cause, but it remains an unexplained phenomena that would be entirely consistent with a spirit leaving the body.

But regardless I have never been in the habit of telling people their experiences are misguided. My older sister claims to have had a frightening experience with an Ouija board as a teen with her friends. So have thousands of other people who swear it moved all by itself. Are they all lying? My mother claims she saw an angel at or during one of or the most trying periods of her life, I never assumed her to be false. I have numerous friends who have had experiences with spirits and haunted houses/ghosts. Many said there was a ghost in a bedroom in my grandparents old house. Another friend was present during a possession at a haunted house during his childhood, there are around 9 corroborating witnesses. Spirits exist. I am able to remember most of these things as I have a better memory than most. I bet lots of people told them they were wrong, maybe they made them doubt themselves. Maybe they are lying for attention? Nobody can claim to be able to spot a liar 100% of the time, and all of us do lie, but I have a pretty good radar with people as to when they are being untruthful, for example many girls I dated/courted with claimed to have been raped. I know 90% of them were being truthful, the story never changed each time it was recited, it was told with absolute clarity being a life defining event they would never forget even the minor details of. 2 or 3, the story changed, and the behavior during and after was inconsistent with such an event. In regards to every last person who has ever told me about any experience with spirits/ghosts, the story remains vivid and the same every time, even when they are re telling me and have forgotten that they told me in the past, in fact I often feign that they never told me just to hear them re tell it. They have no reason to lie to me, and their stories also match up with what other people experience, I believe them. It is truly mind blowing when you think about how many people have had these experiences but never tell another soul about it, out of fear. Or put it down to a simple dream or hallucination. We know with sleep paralysis people do this.

You just have to think about it logically. I'm not saying they know everything or are always right, but there are clearly people with psychic gifts. Would tarot card readers, psychics, astrologists, fortune tellers etc ever make a dime or a consistent living if they were relying on guesswork? I can't see how.

But like with anything in this arena, it is not a proof based thing. You can only learn from your own experiences. Those who have never had spiritual experiences often dismiss them. Those who have are left in no doubt about it. Not many people remain neutral or open which is a shame.

I often wonder, as do many, why it was back in biblical times or a long time ago that it seemed mostly everybody accepted there was a higher power. It could be because of primitiveness or brainwashing, but I doubt it somehow. Aspects of conventional religion obviously rely on fear and control, but I don't think this explains it. I think a long time ago, it was obvious to everyone where they came from. For some reason, in fact many reasons, in this modern day world, walls we have built, within and around, have made us more close minded than ever. We always assume that back then people knew very little. Ancient Aboriginals talked a lot about things like astral projection (out of body experiences), as did the Inuit people. What if they knew MORE? Sure, where technology is concerned we have advanced. And in other ways. But in how many ways have we gone backwards? Too many to list. It is asinine to assume that people back then didn't in fact know MORE about issues of greater importance, just because they couldn't post on facebook about it.

Why then is it our instinct to imagine our deceased loved ones watching over us? Contrary to popular opinion, this is NOT any idea that comes from religion, in fact going to a heaven is a different idea, you cannot be privy to or have any connection to this screwed up earth and be living in any kind of bliss. It is our instinct to think of this. It is our instinct to KNOW this. It could be our fear of death projected, it could be our longing to see them again, it could just be it is easier to explain death to children (particularly of another young person) this way. Atheists often claim we tell our kids things that we know for a fact aren’t true to make the harshness of life easier (eg. Santa Clause, the Tooth Fairy) but eventually we grow up and accept our fate. But that answer doesn't satisfy me. I am not a parent at the time of writing this, none of that is the reason I accept deceased relatives have been with me in spirit. I accept it because I have FELT it. Not once but many times. It is not a hallucination. We imagine our relatives moving on because we know they do, it's burned into us, whether we want to deny it or not. We say Rest In Peace because we acknowledge they are travelling into the unknown where the negative will attract such and the positive beautiful spirits will rest easy. It is always perplexing seeing people who identify as atheist using the R.I.P acronym. Why? You know or feel you know it's irrelevant, they will rest easy, they will do nothing but rest, because there is nothing left, according to your beliefs. Maybe you are just conforming to society, or maybe you are just kidding yourselves. Maybe I am kidding myself too, but I will never presume to tell anyone that their unique experiences are null and void either. That’s narcissistic.

Creation vs. Evolution/Religion vs. Atheism often reminds me of left-right politics. In fact I listen to them go at it and I think "You guys have so much more in common than you care to admit", though I doubt either party would thank me for the comparison. The absurdity of politics is present in the Creation vs. Evolution debate. The idea one group of people can always be right 100% of the time and the other always wrong 100% of the time is a logical fallacy for imperfect human beings. Whether both sides like it or not, they are both responsible in large part for our limited understanding as a society. The idea that the afterlife/eternal existence and religion are INTERCHANGABLE is burned into most people’s brain. What if both Creation and Evolution are wrong/incomplete?

To many people, the earth has obvious handprints of creative sculpting on it, compared to other planets, however in other ways it's also obvious we have evolved as a species and as a planet. The divide is just another illusion. Just like religion, just like politics, anything to keep us controlled. It is worth noting though and so often forgotten that creation does take two forms. Creation of us as people, and the creation of the planet we occupy, the earth plane. Could this earth have been created, was it always here, does it predate our spirits, or did we make it? Did we always co exist? And then, there is us. Our existence being eternal certainly doesn't co-exist with a God creating us from scratch, even if that God did know us "in the womb" or even before then as the bible says. That’s possibly why in Christianity abortion is generally a big sin, whilst in Spirituality many feel abortion is not a sin at all, since a spirit may have planned to only occupy the womb for a short time before dying. Miscarriages also fall into this category, though blame isn't usually apportioned to people for those. It's an interesting and refreshing way to consider two of life’s cruelest "mistakes". How could God ever let that happen or send a child to the womb only to destroy it? What kind of sick plan would that be, even if that soul did inherit heaven afterwards? But if we as "God" sent ourselves to learn life lessons, and the mother and father involved, and then that plan all comes together after the passing of all or even during life, it's not such a cruel event after all. Tickets on earth are in high demand after all. The abortion debate certainly does bring a lot of hatred from many camps, another divide I am quite sure the global elite don't mind in the slightest.

How do I know I am eternal? The reasoning is quite straightforward. First of all, you cannot get something from nothing here. It's the chicken and the egg. How did we get here? Where did we come from? Two people need to fuck for someone to be born, they can't come from one person. Not way back when anyway. Contrary to popular opinion, even Sciences best guess, the Big Bang Theory, doesn't purport to explain what happened in the VERY beginning. It is an obvious logical deduction in the very least that there is a supreme entity that is not subject to the same laws and limitations as we are on this earth plane, you can call it God, you can call it whatever you wish. It must exist. It exists in fact within US. We were sent here by ourselves, our spirit, our mind, to occupy our body for a brief time, to learn on this lower earth plane. When we leave and our spirit departs our body dies but we move on. Our family members here on earth may or may not be in our spiritual family, but deceased ones will certainly greet us on the other side, as will our higher spiritual being even whilst we are here.

How do we know this? Amongst other things, dreams, out of body experiences and near death experiences. Most people are familiar with NDE's, however many dismiss them as a dream or hallucination. There are numerous reasons why this is impossible. Not just improbable, but reasons taken in their entirety, impossible.

First of all, when you examine the accounts, they are all revolving around the same thing. They all involve floating out of and above one’s body once being clinically dead, often seeing medics working on them in the hospital or on the scene of an accident/murder. Then going up through a tunnel, often being met by deceased family members, Jesus, and a myriad of other people. They experience the unique and fantastic feeling of weightlessness flying up the tunnel, where they are almost always met by a voice asking if they want to go further, or being told it is not their time yet, they must go back. Then they are sent back quickly through the tunnel much faster and land back in their body. The feeling of being totally pain free floating outside the body is a unique one and nobody who has ever been outside their body will know it. If it were a dream or hallucination that our body makes at or just prior to death, then wouldn't everybody be having a different dream? A few might have the same one, but how would everyone have almost the exact same experience? If, as Atheists claim, our dreams are just manifestations of existing thoughts, wouldn’t everyone have a mostly different one? Yes, most of us ponder all our lives about life after death and seeing loved ones after we die, so maybe that would be in the hallucination, but most of us are unaware of any tunnel or feeling of weightlessness being a spirit, this stuff is never talked about openly. People would have no reason to have this in their thoughts in the first place.

Secondly, there are many, many documentaries and accounts of emergency room doctors and surgeons who have had patients who have had NDE's. This phenomena is not a secret or hidden, or a conspiracy theory, it's just not talked about openly these days. The mainstream has no interest in it, preferring to instead control us with religion vs Atheism and left right politics. But there is an over abundance of information if people seek it out. It is just more common in the last 10-20 years because of advances in medical technology it is "easier" to bring a patient back from clinical death. Though it is worth noting that television has for years painted a totally unrepresentative picture of resuscitation. Even arresting in an ideal hospital setting with professionals all around you, hooked up to machines, there is only a 2-4% chance of being brought back. Many might be entitled to feel it was more like 40-50% based on television shows showing CPR. Even though TV isn't real, it has strong effects on our subconscious we don't often realize.  Patients often talk about watching for a time being worked on, and can recall how many people came into the room, the clothes they were wearing and the exact things they did. These people came into the room after they were unconscious or clinically dead and had left before they regained consciousness. Some also floated up through the roof of the hospital where they had never been and were able to identify objects in there and people went up later and checked and confirmed it. There are also numerous people who were brought back to life after flat lining from a coma, and despite having been measured to have almost, or zero actual identifiable brain function, had these vivid experiences. These people cannot have been dreaming or hallucinating.

Nor can people on record who were born blind who had near death and/or out of body experiences in full, vivid color. We know that people who go blind after birth dream in color, but people who are born blind do not, they dream in shapes and patterns throughout their lives. If even one of these blind at birth people had a NDE in color, that already proves it correct, as they have done something their physical body is demonstrably incapable of doing, having never learned color. Saying these experiences are dreams or hallucinations is wrong. The same reverse situation is also true of people born deaf who experience crystal clear sound in their NDE's/OBE's. There is far too much empirical evidence to dismiss the phenomena as a dream or hallucination. There are also numerous people who have had a friend or relative simply astral project from a different location and visit them, then afterwards explain to them what they did in detail when they were not in the room to have been able to see it.

We dream every single night. For a myriad of reasons we may not always remember it. Every single night for our entire lives we have left our bodies, we are just not consciously aware of it. Astral Projection is where you project a copy of your consciousness onto other planes of existence, but your physical body still maintains all its functions like heartbeat and brain function and digestion. Of course many dreams are garbled and don't have any deeper meaning, but many are communications. Dreams and Music are the two biggest gateways to our soul, but of course any technology can be used to communicate. Can you imagine a life without music? Nobody can. Music is an integral part of our psyche. Spirits often use music to communicate messages to us.

Take the view of an atheist, why would we dream at all? Why wouldn't our body just go into a sleep mode like a computer for 8 hours? What would the point of dreams be if they don't mean anything or have consequence? Think about it. Atheism is kind of like nihilism. Life has no purpose. That never made sense to me. We're born we live we die. I don't think so. Most of us follow a path, have a reason to be here. I appreciate that what does and doesn't make sense is often a function of circumstance, but the idea some of us are born into absolute wealth, others born in poverty, some born with working bodies other disabled, some with great intelligence, others borderline intellectual functioning, never made sense to me. Luck of the draw? We are here for a reason, to learn, to experience. It makes absolutely no sense to me some people can be so lucky their entire lives and others never. Some people live to be 100 years old, other poor souls die in the womb never tasting fresh air even once, leaving their mothers and fathers heartbroken. No, there is a reason for everything in this game of life. It also shows that material possessions/fame are not important. Those famous on this planet may not be right away or at all on the other side, likewise those who have done great work on earth may be revered on the other side.

Much along the points of the NDE's before, recurring dreams are a very real phenomena. Polls and surveys have shown there are a definite top 5-10 recurring dreams we all have. For example personally one of the top 5 and the one I definitely have the most is being back at school, usually high school. Others include a plane crash, despite me having no fear of flying. If, dreams were just manifestations of thoughts, we would have recurring dreams, but would we really all have the same recurring dreams? Unlikely. It is not just surveys, everybody I have talked to on the topic all have the same top 5-10 recurring dreams, and the exact same ones almost every time. Yes, many of us had our best years at high school, so it would make sense to have that recurring dream, but what if we don’t think of that often? Many people have the plane or car crash dream despite not driving or flying. There are also many things we think of a lot more often that we never actually dream of. You cannot establish a cause and effect for dreaming based on how often you think of something. It doesn't always work that way, dreams have deeper meaning and if something isn't important, you most likely won’t dream of it despite how often you think of it. Dream analysts have shown that by looking at the recurring dream and events in your life there will be most likely a deeper meaning and representation to the dream that correlated to events in your life.

Scientists have never been able to explain why despite how many years we dream, unless we launch a lucid dream, we can never know that we are dreaming. It feels so real, in fact it often feels more real than life, despite being unable to recall getting to the locales or certain aspects being not what they should/would be. Again why is this? Despite how absurd or impossible circumstances and ambience can be in a dream, it always feels so real. It is because it is real. The projection is actually happening, and you are outside of your body though not in this physical plane. We also all fall back into our bodies in bed at some point. That’s what that famous feeling of "falling" in bed is, that sensation that we all have and are often curious about. You can fall back in from being just out of it, halfway out, or miles away.

They also can't explain how we can SENSE so vividly in our dreams. Not only can we feel, we can feel pain, we can touch, we can eat, we can taste, we can sense. When we kiss in dreams we can feel it, when we have sex in dreams we can feel ourselves orgasm, despite often times not having an actual wet dream, which can be confirmed when you wake up by an absence of semen stains. Sex often feels BETTER in dreams than in real life. How is that possible? Why can we taste food and drink in our dreams. When you hug someone you can feel their arms around you. Their warmth, their aura. How can any of this be possible if we are not actually experiencing it? People who astral project have confirmed you can eat on other planes. Yes our brains can recall smells, tastes, sounds/songs and feelings/sensations when we are awake, but not very vividly. Not with 1/10th of the vividness we FEEL it with in our dreams. Dreams are obviously a gateway to the other side.

It's also worth remembering that the majority of people dream in the first person. 3rd person dreams have certainly been reported but seem to be far less common and many including myself don't have them at all. This is further evidence pointing to an actual experience taking place. If dreams were just random projections of our desires and existing thoughts, wouldn't dreams in the 3rd person where we see ourselves be much more common, or perhaps the norm? Especially in this day and age with so many photographs, so much social media and television, and so many people who focus on their looks and appearance, spend hours at the gym or in front of the mirror, the single image of our face and body is burned into our mind as much as or more than any other. Why then do we not tend to dream of it? Because it probably doesn't matter in the grander scheme of things, that’s why. It will be but a rotting, stinking pile of flesh once we move on. That’s why I also think the focus too many humans have on gravesites and final resting places is sometimes unhelpful. Don't get me wrong, it's nice to have a place of remembrance, a place to go to. But at the same time it could cause tunnel vision and place too much emphasis on the earth body. Communicating with spirits is just as important. That’s why quite frankly I don't give a toss whether I am cremated or buried at this point. There are many ways we can remember and embrace those gone before us, and we shouldn't feel guilty for not visiting grave sites, as long as we remember in other ways, and never forget. Never forget to remember, and your loved ones will live on IN YOU. Through you and as a part of you. Keep their spirit alive here.

The idea our mind and consciousness exists outside/beyond our body also explains why our short term memory can go but our long term memory almost always remains. Like Tesla and many others theorized, could our memories/knowledge or at least segments of, actually be stored outside of our body? It would explain why scientists have never pinpointed the exact location memories are stored in the brain. The idea that the mind exists independently and outside of the brain/body is being more and more endorsed in mainstream Science. Boston scientists recently published a study concluding that dreams do take place in a parallel universe. Mathematicians also accept overwhelming probability that a parallel universe indeed exists. Comparing a brain to a computer isn't always helpful, but think of computers through history. They always need upgrading to store memory. Eventually they need replacing. Yet from the beginning of time, it seems our brain can retain unlimited long term memory, even with little training or exercise. The most that can go wrong with our brains are tumors and Alzheimer’s, or depression/mental illness, or brain damage and concussion. But even then, in the vast bulk of cases long term memories remain or eventually return. Everyone recalls memories from age 3-5 onward. It seems storage of memories and data is not always, if ever finite. No matter how primitive technology was, or how advanced it will be in 1000 years, our mind will always trump it. Not even mentioning that we are seeing but not a fraction of what we are capable of in greater realms. Perhaps this is because our mind and spirit exists in different planes beyond our bodies, and will always trump anything here. This would also explain why brain transplants appear to be impossible in any time. Each of our brains are unique receivers linked to our greater consciousness. Sever the link, and your earth body dies. I often wonder if we are conscious from age 3 backwards into the womb, but it gets temporarily wiped at some point after that. Who knows what lessons we may have learned but don't remember yet during our time in the womb and through ages 1-4. As any of us who have been around toddlers know, even at 2 years of age and sometimes younger, they speak with amazing clarity and are clearly conscious beings with amazing recall of events. In fact people often recall being alert as children, being able to astral project even easier than they can as an adult. Children often have gifts and claim to see entities. Maybe we are more mortal as adults than children. It's impossible to know though. That information like certain others appears to be unavailable to us here. I know for a fact that I am certainly not the only one who swears black and blue toddlers have told me many things about me/life that they almost certainly would have no way of knowing.

On that note, I have always wondered why we count our age from the day we were born. Technically we should add 9 or so months to our actual age, or at least several, because regardless of what people believe about fetal rights, there is a cut off point long before we pop out where we are fully formed humans. Just another example of the self, or system imposed limitations we place on ourselves not to think of the grander picture. Being that I was 2-3 weeks overdue, I am definitely a little older than my age and will always see myself that way.

The brain is a receiver. Many of us can't visualize our brain as children, often picturing some elaborate computer, and are often underwhelmed when we see an actual brain. I have never believed that organ is capable of producing our entire consciousness. Not even close. It's obviously a receiver responsible for all our cognitive function, and is truly amazing in it's own right, but I have had the hardest time believing it is capable of producing my consciousness. Not even close.

How did I arrive where I am now? It's not something that happens overnight. I would say over a period of about 2-3 years through numerous experiences I confirmed much of what I already felt I knew for much of my life. It's not one single experience, nor is it ever likely to be. I didn't have any experiences with spirits or haunted houses or ghosts as a child, at least that I recall. Nor was I touched too much by death personally. When a childhood friend committed suicide a couple of years ago, and I went back to the place we hung out as children, memories flooded back, emotions boiled over, and I could feel her with me. The thing is, I had lost contact with this girl for 11 years, and had been back to that place numerous times in the years between, but those memories were gone, I never recalled them. Nor did I recall them in the 2-3 days after I learned of her passing, but once I went to that location, the memories came flooding back. Regardless, this emotional moment was not in my head, as when I went back there a year later again, it was not the same. Though I did go on to have later experiences with her. We can definitely feel deceased people watching us.

It is not coincidence. It can't be connecting dots after the fact. These are only the experiences I remember after becoming aware, imagine all the thousands and thousands that happened during life that I never picked up on. During a much more recent time period a friend who I knew from online also died. We used to post in a music group a lot, along with hundreds of other people. thousands and thousands of different songs with many friends of mine, both from "real life" and online. Not only did I feel her watching over me, with me at times, but sitting down one evening thinking of her, a song randomly came to my mind and I played it, as you do. Never thought much about it at the time and kept playing music, but listening to the song it seemed to attract the strongest vibes from her. A week later whilst searching the music group I did come across the song. No coincidence she posted she loved it from her childhood. But not only that, the song was defined by the artist as being about being able to live your life true to who you are, not caring what others think of you, and don't be a gatekeeper just out of fear of judgment. Live the life you planned for yourself. The song was Karma Chameleon by the Culture Club. As a "conspiracy theorist", what could possibly be a greater message to send in a song? Many could accuse me of just connecting dots after the fact that aren't there, but they will never comprehend that anything being written is about a past experience. When you live through it and notice it as it happens, you realize just how real it is. That is why the written word, whilst powerful in it's own right, is not the best way to convey a message or to learn. Experience is. Knowledge is not power. Applied knowledge is power. Learning knowledge makes you a person with power, applying your learnt knowledge makes you a powerful person.Realization that songs you have liked all your life often describe your life to a tee is bliss. You realize these issues are in songs and popular culture everywhere and always have been. Songs have different meanings to different people, always will, but lyric interpretation is phenomenal. Especially songs that I came to know in the previous 2-3 years of my life I felt an awakening taking progress, though not always understanding what was occurring at the time. Peter Gabriel has always been one of my favorite artists and I see the spiritual side of his music right off the bat. Mike and the Mechanics "Silent Running" is profound. Queensryche's "silent lucidity" also. Trains "drops of Jupiter" in my opinion is a beautiful song about a soul astral projecting through our solar system. Paul Simons "slip sliding away". pied piper - Crispian St Peters, Kansas - Carry on my wayward son, river of dreams - Billy Joel, Live - lightening crashes. It is truly amazing when you see references to this topic and of astral projection etc in lyrics throughout music you have loved all your life. I personally believe many artists sing about these feelings as it doesn't seem socially a topic that anyone wants to talk about beyond religion. Many artists just pick up the pen and write and don't even know what their song is about. People who were put here to make music may not always realize the greater significance of their work.  Even conventional sayings like "the light at the end of the tunnel" is about the near death experience of going up through the tunnel and towards the light. Most people don't even realize that though. They just think it means the silver lining in the cloud. They don't think about what it really means. Music is the gateway to the soul. I believe our musical tastes describe us as a person. So much can be learned about ourselves just from listening to music. They may even describe our destiny. I have had these over and over again, each more profound than the last. There is just too many to list and they are an ongoing phenomena.

After trying astral projection for a while, I finally launched an OBE from a lucid dream. I physically floated out of my body. I was paralyzed by fear and thought of my body as id read to do so to end an astral projection and it worked. I woke up. Despite achieving the success I wanted, I found the experience frightening. Yet I didn't encounter anything bad. It wasn't as terrifying as sleep paralysis, but I wanted out. I guess I just was too tied to my body at that point. But the unique feeling of floating out of the body combined with the terror is something I have never experienced in a dream before or since. Even in my plane crash/death dreams I always accept my fate with poise and wake up apon death. This terror was genuine. I hope when I am ready I can have many more experiences and finally voyage beyond this room.

It's also worth noting that many people have had dreams or nightmares of fighting, and woken up with real injuries on their bodies, or discovered injuries on their bodies they cannot account for and have no recollection of receiving. This also points to dreams being "real". I myself have woken with injuries after fight dreams, injuries which are in shapes and patterns I have never seen before and are not consistent with someone grabbing or scratching, having experienced that injury many times before. We have all experienced during the day finding bruises/cuts/welts on our bodies that we have no recollection of receiving, in fact cannot have received here. But if you think back to your dreams/nightmares, if you can still remember them, you may recall fighting an entity on the astral plane. Skeptics claim that the injuries are caused during sleep by the dreamer causing them, however the injury patterns are often very inconsistent with self caused injuries. Sometimes the injuries are even on the back or in the middle of the spine and are only noticed when/if the person sees their reflection in a mirror, in an area people can't reach during sleep, so unless they were out of the bed sleepwalking, cannot have caused those injuries themselves. It shows how far reaching some will go to deny reality and tell others their experiences are incorrect. Another thing that confirms OBE's are not dreams or hallucinations is when people are moving and look into a mirror they see something truly amazing. Their glowing spirit reflected in the glass. I remember looking into a mirror as a child and wondering if the room reflected back in the image was somewhat of a parallel universe. If I could somehow get into that mirror, I could unlock the gateway to the other side. I wasn't far off I don't think.

Having said that, it is worth noting that many humans do have a natural fear of death. That does create an inherent bias to want to believe in something else/higher existence. It is largely impossible to be entirely neutral. On the other hand, many people detest life and hope death is the end. Fear of the unknown/blackness can be very unbecoming. Naturally though, it is certainly possible to go too far the other way and dismiss everything as a meaningless coincidence or irony, in the name of objectivity, when in reality you may be actually over compensating and ignoring the obvious. We see this all throughout life, but particularly here. Conspiracists often say, there is no such thing as coincidence. I prefer to say there is no such thing as MEANINGLESS coincidence. Coincidences certainly exist, but most of the time, they mean something. They convey a message to you, they explain. Of course, as said, many dreams can be mumbled and have no greater meaning. But profound ones convey much, and once you are aware, you will know exactly the difference between the two.

Another thing that pre disposes us to believing in higher power is loneliness. In a world full of people who invariably let us down, the idea of an all loving God and never being totally alone is very comforting. That’s a good thing! But God is also US. We are never alone, nor have we ever been. Our guides/relatives/family are always with us in spirit. We are all God. God is love. In a world where people often ridicule those with unique perspective, it is comforting knowing how I am inspiring those gone before me and how they will be learning from me here, perhaps watching with pride. That does make the going easier when people from all quarters call you crazy for your beliefs. We need to know we are not alone, life is much easier that way. But we need not the fear that organized religion often brings with it. The weight of your shoulders once you realize life has purpose is immense. It's a much healthier way to live.

Finally, explaining death to our children is the hardest part of being an adult, and a discussion we will eventually have to have with them. Atheists rightly point out that few could look a child in the eye and say their favorite person has just faded into blackness forever. It is much easier to explain they have gone to a better place (heaven). But as I have demonstrated, it is much closer to the actual answer.

How do you become spiritual? It's not instant "salvation". I don't ever wish to define it. Obviously my views would be defined as spirituality, but I refuse to define it in terms, there are simply no words great enough to describe our eternal existence. "Salvation" is earned as it is received, nobody gets it on a plate and nobody gets a free guaranteed pass immediately upon death either. Your beliefs do NOT make you a better person, your behavior and attitude does. Love makes the world go around. Superior belief is the gateway to superior living, but you cannot have one without the other. Just as it's absurd to say someone would instantly go to heaven after murdering 50 people just because they found God in Jail but a person who lead a great loving life never hurting anyone but didn't accept Jesus as their savior will burn in hell forever. I reject eternal hell. Even many Christians do, I believe the bible is true on many things, I believe there was a person called Jesus Christ, I believe in God too, but God is in all of us, we are all God. Many things were inserted a long the way, often through fear, to control people, eternal hell is one. It's a logical fallacy that an all loving God would send at least 66% of his creations (2/3 of the world isn't Christian so would automatically go there no matter what) to burn in hell forever, everyone knows this. Who would seriously want any part of that if it were true? Nobody said life after death will always be easy, or that there aren't personal hells, but damnation does not exist. You in many ways go where you believe. If you are a negative person, you will have a low spiritual level. If you are a loving person you will soar far and high. You will stay on the lower planes until you are able to change or are helped out. We like to believe there is some place where murderers and evil people will linger forever, but it's not true. Everything happens for a reason and we may very well chose our date of death and how we die before we come here. Even the people we detest most in life, are there for some lesson or greater purpose for us. I believe our bodies are immortal to a point but we also have an expiration date, a pre determined time of death where we will expire on this plane of existence and move on.

I also find Astrology very compelling, my star sign is Cancer, being born on June 23, and all descriptions I read of Cancerians described my personality traits perfectly.  From my tight fistedness with money, being emotional and wearing my heart on my sleeve, to careful planning of life and the future, to preferring routine/organization and plan over spontaneity. Compatibility charts described all 10 or so girlfriends/courtships I'd had to this point and our relationships/dramas/arguments more perfectly than I ever could, not just right on some things, but 110% on every area, even things I didn't fully realize, as if I were writing it myself. The description of those girls personalities were also all spot on. The one girl who was my biggest "the one that got away" story that we all have, the one I loved more than any other, the one whom I banked all the odds on being with and the one I thought certain to succeed but the one relationship that capitulated so spectacularly before me, was also one of only a few star signs deemed to be totally incompatible with mine. Not only that but I also keyed in my parents star signs, and my sisters and brother in laws. All came back with perfect descriptions of the things they share in common and the things most often fought about, and I should know those as well as anyone, they are my family. Not just cherry picking or joining of dots, perfect descriptions. I find the idea to dismiss all of that as meaningless coincidence too much to bare. Sure, Astrology is as much a core belief as anything else is, and I cannot speak for others success with astrological descriptions/predictions, but I find it hard to believe so many would be taken in by something if it were pure unadulterated rubbish, and the accusation that it is appears to me to be baseless and unfounded. I have never followed weekly or monthly horoscopes closely enough to judge their accuracy, but they are two different topics that people often confuse. I am only talking about astrology and star signs broadly.

Time doesn't exist. Certainly not in the afterlife. There is no crossover. Time is a way we use to catalogue and structure our lives here. It has no use in eternal afterlife. Things can happen in an hour that takes days weeks or years here. I have many friends who are agnostic, atheist and religious. I love them all. I fight with my dying breath for their rights to all have their own core beliefs and not be judged for that. However I must say, lately more and more I found myself levitated toward the agnostics and religious. In my opinion many atheists are often the definition of what they accuse creationists of. I would prefer a Mormon or Jehovah’s witness knocking on my door to an Atheist. Though the latter probably never would. I find the atheists to often be more close minded than the religious. Their identities are both a manufactured product in my opinion. But at least all or most of the spiritual aspects I have covered here, creationists don't deny them, they may have different conclusions, but they don't deny the existence of the phenomena (or even the POSSIBLE existence) or tell me or others that their independent experiences are wrong. Judgment and anger are something we will never totally rid ourselves of, but they are by far and away our greatest enemy in life. There has been more than enough judgment from me in this piece alone.

One thing humorously enough that I'm sure all three will agree on, is that no human being is perfect. Never was, never will be. And just for the record, that doesn't happen by chance either.

By James Sloan

No planes at the World Trade Center, why the movement will always hide this fact at all costs
 
                    Whilst the idea of no planes at the World Trade Center was floated as early as 2001 by Nico Haupt and  others, the hypothesis wasn't taken "seriously"  until around late 2004, 2005 and early 2006. Right around a year before September Clues was released.  Of course, there had been many challenges to the very official idea that passenger jets collided with the World Trade Centre, usually  taking the form of Plane Switch theories, Pods and Flashes, the idea the planes were real but Modified fuel tankers and suchlike. With  hindsight, it is very easy to lump all these 
theories together, but out of respect, they were due diligently researched at the time by many  dedicated researchers, and infact almost all had their own followers, they weren't all postulated by the same groups of researchers. The Pod theory  came from Lets Roll Forums for example, 
and was in regards to the second impact. In Plane Site, released in 2004, borrowed heavily from LRF  research, however went one step further and suggested Flight 11 also had a Pod, but this was debated at LRF. Many sub sets believed things  ranging from a Missile hitting the North Tower, 
a modified DC 10, and other ideas. It must be born in mind it was much easier to suggest that a plane didn't hit the North Tower at the time, because as only one clear video of that event existed, and the plane was hardly very clear in the shot, the  postulators were hardly suggesting media fakery was involved, so long as of course they suggested a missile impact or some other technology. Something  physical of course. This has always been the LRF angle. Something physical as oppose to video manipulation. Of course, much good research had been  done there and in other places about the idea the Naudet film was a set up, and of course watching what could only be described as a perfect swing  of the camera by Jules Naudet, as well as many other perfect zoom in and zoom outs on all crash shots, and tower demolition shots, it was always  presumed the cameramen or women had foreknowledge of what was about to happen. However, the idea the images were real was never challenged. That is what  has been, and as I will go into further detail, what will always be, protected, at all costs. You can believe the Naudet story was a scam, you  can believe there were 300 or more camera men or women out in the street who all captured the event perfectly and knew what was going to happen. As  long as you didn't challenge the validity of the 
footage that was fine. That is as far as it was ever taken on LRF, probably the most liberal truth forum  up until that point. As long as there was a camera person in the street who filmed what happened, it really did not matter if you suggested it was  a passenger jet, an orb, a blimp, a hot air 
balloon, or even a baseball. Just as long as the film was authentic. Protect the media at all costs. 
 
                      Whilst it is very hard to argue anyone in 2012 who believes any planes were used at all is a serious  top flight researcher, this was not always the case. Many people (myself included) were at the most 50-50 on the issue for a very long time,  because we never knew any better, and there were so many rabbit trails to go down. It must be said though, people were not totally ignorant of all the  issues with "planes". People understood the physics of the crashes were in the very least suspicious, the idea an aluminum plane could penetrate  the aluminum cladding, steel curtain wall, 
thick safety glass, and with a wingspan of at least 7 floors, many layers of 4 inch thick concrete,  steel decking, webs of trusses, and office furniture, going all the way from one side of the tower to the other, AND THEN, the engines having enough energy  to penetrate through the safety glass, steel curtain wall and aluminum cladding (all without leaving a hole in the other side of the tower), well, the  idea was far fetched in the least. So enter the Pod theory, where a bulge on the underside of the craft fired a missile at or just before impact, which I  guess cleared the path for the plane. Quite bizarre in itself really given the videos showed none of this, except a small flash at impact. But this idea  was taken seriously by many. LRF even went as far as to produce merchandise including but not limited to t-shirts to promote this theory. This idea was  also sometimes coupled with other ideas, such as the plane was packed to the brim with explosives, and or the impact floors of the building were blown out  with their own explosives, at or just prior to impact. 
The last two ideas are actually more plausible than the Pod idea itself, in theory anyway. But once  again, all photos and videos were authentic. 
 
                     Enter early 2006. A new influx of "researchers" started appearing on 9/11 forums, promoting a new  idea, that (at least) the second impact was fraudulent, no 
plane hit WTC 2. It was either a missile, or a bomb, or nothing. Subsequently, for the first time, the  images were being challenged. Many of these posters were 
probably legit and clung on to the new refreshing idea, but many were also obvious plants designed  to stir up emotions and essentially ruin the idea. LRF was  notorious for banning this research or limiting it, the Admin Phil Jayhan banning MANY posters for  promoting the idea no plane hit WTC 2. This was in obvious conflict with their precious Pod theory, and he was having none of it. The research was eventually  allowed, however often relegated to sub sections of forums such as "No plane, No brain" sections, mocking the idea and making it clear it was a fringe theory,  not to be discussed seriously.Laughable really given Jayhan himself is now a No Planer, his previous Pod theory now totally incompatible with his new empty  towers stance. If Jayhan had even a modicum of respectability in the glory years of LRF, it is not totally gone. Which is ironic and deliberate given  his latest stance is as close to the truth as his website has ever been in the past. His website is almost dead now with very few new threads. During my  tenure there I witnessed a great many legitimate posters be banned and harassed for posting no plane research, even at the  point wherehe agreed with them in theory. It was pathetic to watch and I no longer wanted any part of it. 
 
                     So of course, by the time September Clues came out in 2007, the idea was already viewed as hogwash by  many. Every 9/11 guy out there told you not to look at 
it, Alex Jones made a comparison to Mental Illness, and guys like Ace Baker, Nico Haupt and others deliberately made themselves look crazy whilst promoting 
the "fringe idea". A real shame too that Clues was not narrated, and had an amateurish feel to it, as  previously slick productions like Loose Change Second Edition trumped it in many peoples eyes. So much of the 9/11 audience simply refuse to take the idea  seriously, but as I will layout, there is more motivation to protect this idea than EVEN the idea the official story is untrue. Even websites like WTC7.net started  putting disclaimers on their site as early as 2007 saying "we do not promote no jetliner theories, or incivility." Molding the two together, assuming no  planers are there to start trouble and infighting, as many of the plant posters in 2006 did. They ruined the idea before it got to the mainstream. But on  with the show; 
 
                      For starters, no plane insults are asinine. Most 9/11 truthers have always been no planers for 2 out  of 4 of the crashes that day. Including all on LRF, who practically invented the no plane no brain chant. Though there are some figureheads such as Jim  Hoffman, Steven Jones etc who have not challenged the idea that four civilian planes crashed on 9/11, the vast bulk of the truth movement do not believe that  Flights 11, 77, 175 and 93 took off that day and crashed 
where stated. So it's okay to be a no planer, as long as its for 2/4 of the events? Right. So I guess  the only difference between flight 77 and 175 and 11 is that it was shown on film. After All, there are witnesses to all four crashes, so how is it  witnesses in Shanksville and Washington can be discounted, but witnesses in NYC must be taken at face value, despite all reporting vastly different types of  aircraft. So I guess the only thing left is the films, which have demonstrably proven as fake. From the fact that commercial jets cannot do 550mph at sea level, to  the fact no black boxes were found, to the fact that the videos are all fake and show vastly different trajectories, to the fact a jet engine cannot fly  500 meters and land on a street corner with no witnesses, 
to countless other facts, the evidence is clear that no planes crashed in NYC. If you cannot see that,  the scope of this blog is beyond you. I am not here to insult you, but direct you to other research on The Real News Online and other sites. The scope of this blog is to demonstrate WHY the movement will always protect the idea. 
 
                      The idea they would use any real planes it outrageous. They have to be in control of every variable,  and the only way to ensure that is to fake the videos. Nothing can go wrong. They have total control of the stage. There is no proof of any planes. For the  first time in aviation history, black boxes are missing, four of them. A continuous looping tape on flight 93 managed to lose the last 3 minutes of its audio,  this is impossible. Don't people think that if planes 
really took off that day they would just release the security tapes of people boarding the flights?  Nothing to lose. The news footage shows a 50-60 story fireball, a 50 story orange fireball. The soot part even higher. This is outrageous. The orange flame  part of a fireball from a 767 crash would never be much higher than 3 or 4 stories at the most. Many videos of 767's crashing exist. The schematics of the crash are totally  wrong. That is like a jet crashing into the street and the 
fireball going higher than the tallest skyscrapers. Never would happen. The plane hits floor 78 and  the orange part of the fireball goes at least 10 stories beyond the roof line, the soot even higher before it molds into the existing smoke. This is laughable to  believe that could ever happen, much less with 10,000 gallons of jet fuel. 
 
                       The reason that the movement protect this idea is two-fold. Firstly, they have to have the figure of 3000 people dying. Once you know that over 250 people did not die in plane crashes, you do tend to question the final death toll more, however the alleged  flights 77 and 93 were sparsely occupied, so the finality of the toll would not be affected much. 
 
                       The second is that once you take the planes out of the equation, many parts of the rest of the story  start to crumble. Firstly, how can the news footage of the towers burning for an hour be true if no plane hit the tower? What is creating and sustaining  those fires? How could you then have people up there starting fires if the building was fully occupied? And how would they get out? If no plane it the  tower, why are all those people jumping out? Even if they blew a hole in the side of the tower, this wouldn't start a massive fire or make people jump out. How would they get a perfect sized gash in the tower? If people were up there starting fires, how can the jumpers be real? How did the fires become black just like jet fuel would? Who would put themselves in that 
kind of danger to light those fires? If no plane hit, then why would people be trapped at all? It's not like all that plane debris would be blocking the stair cases. If the tower is full, you can't have any of this. There would be so many witnesses to  these phantom guys starting fires in the building. Jayhan tries to explain this with his "smoke machines", but you can't have smoke without fire Phil, so what  is causing the fires? 
 
                      Jim Fetzer and others have tried to explain no planes with a hologram theory, but again this doesn't  advance the idea much nor explain any of the above pitfalls. 
Fetzer has even advanced the idea a cloaked plane 1400 feet to the right projected this hologram over  NYC and into the building. The schematics of the hologram theory are outside the scope of this blog, but needless to say, it still preserves the idea  of a full occupied building. How did the 25,000 people in the tower or the thousands on the street (assuming that is the case which it wasn't), not see this  plane offshore? What a ridiculous risk to go to when you can just fake the videos. Fetzer promotes Richard Halls 9/11 study, however after much review and  critique, I find it no more scientific than the NIST report, he draws line of data that don't even exist, much like NIST don't focus on the events after  "initiation of collapse" and assume everything is automatic.Real scientists assume NOTHING and I am truly surprised a scholar like Fetzer would consider Halls study in  any way scientific. Any theory as long as the buildings are full, the streets are full of witnesses, and the cameras are rolling and capturing the actual  event, they don't care what advanced truthers believe. Grilled Cheese Sandwich hit the WTC? No problem, as long as they keep the media complicity out of it.  Jim Fetzer was quoted on Dose of Reality with Brian S
Staveley and Justin Cooke, when confronted about the absurd trajectory on the dive bomber shot and  others, "Oh well, what they probably did was throw in a few tampered videos to confuse the situation". Well first off Jim, those videos were broadcast on CBS  on the DAY of 9/11. Secondly, once you admit even one of the network shots might not be legit, you call into question the entire Richard Hall study, which  is based solely off network and home videos. 
 
                      The hologram theory still has all the same pitfalls listed earlier. How do you get the fires? How do  you get the Jet Engine and landing gear in the street? Must have been 
planted, and if so, how did they do that with thousands of people on the street? If you are forced to  admit those shots are doctored too it further damages the hologram theory. The hologram theory is designed once again to keep the media out of it, to  protect the idea of empty towers and floors not being complete. What of the jumpers? If they are not inhaling the toxic fumes of jet fuel than why on earth are they  jumping? And obviously, if you continue to deny the media 
fakery than you must also account for jumpers being 50 feet out from the towers, Photoshop and so on.  Good luck denying all the irrefutable evidence posted on these Photoshops at The Real News Online, Clues forum and LRF about this subject. LRF has excellent research about fake  jumpers, they just reach sometimes different conclusions about how that effect was achieved, though recently they seem to have backed away from the dummies out the windows theory, to their credit. Lets Roll Forums has arguably one of the most vast and proficient research teams ever seen in the movement, it's just a shame their admin and several of their mods clearly 
possess an agenda to hide the final 25% of the truth being exposed at Cluesforum, The Real News Online and other outlets, as well as attack vehemently those who attempt to preach this to the public, like Brian S Staveley and Simon Shack. 
 
                          The only explanation for all of the above is media fakery. It is the only way for the perps to be in  total control. It is provable beyond all shadow of a doubt to those who will only look. The idea they would use real planes is too risky. Also hologram  technology is largely untested, and what of the risks of the image at that height reflecting off other buildings, or shadowing in as it hit the tower and  reflecting off the glass of the building. The extreme risk of the shaped charges not creating the correct looking holes in the towers, the key to remember  is they only had one shot at all of this. The towers do not look even remotely real in any of the moving video. The correct look was glassy and silvery, with a tinge of black. Below are two excellent scenes shot in 1991, starting at 6.47 that show the correct look of the  towers. 
 

                Regular cameras in 1991 show the correct look, and yet in 2001 this is the best they can manage.  Notice the definition of windows in the foreground buildings and the lack thereof in the WTC. It is worth noting that around 1996 they changed the Friends intro  for example, and many movies and TV shows stopped showing the correct WTC coloring, a definite and disgraceful attempt at pre programming. 
 
                        Hopefully over the course of the last two years it has become very obvious why the 9/11 figureheads  avoid no planes at the WTC at all costs. And a few who don't ignore it such as Phil Jayhan and Jim Fetzer, attempt to do all they can to muddy the waters and promote outrageous sub theories to distract the dedicated minority who see through the bullshit of Alex Jones, Dylan Avery and the big players in 9/11 truth. They do so because the agenda number one has 
always been to protect the media. Though I am sure their preference is you believe the official story, they really could care less if you think Martians from planet Zhog attacked the WTC on 9/11. Just as long as you are unaware that the MEDIA attacked the WTC  on 9/11. Now, just to clarify, obviously anyone who believes that 9/11 was an inside job, does not trust the media per say. They know (hopefully) they are controlled, a propaganda machine, and they lie and deceive the public. However they still assume that as current affairs people are journalists, they  will at least provide us with coverage of events, and that their news footage and videos can more or less be trusted. If they cover a war, terrorist attack or  court case, whilst knowing that the motives and perps behind those events are probably not as we are told, the COVERAGE of the event is truthful and the images are real. It is this, and only this, at the bottom line, that the powers that be wish more than anything else to protect from the world. 
 
                         It is the WORLD media. It is far too easy to blame the 9/11 attacks on the "American Government". It  is also grossly unfair on the American public. The same forces that control things behind the scenes control all our countries spare 4 or 5 in the world. No one is safe from their oppression and nobody is safe from their persecution. We at The Real News Online.Com have contributors from all over the planet and it would be naive of any of us to think we are any safer than each other from their persecution and their torment. They want you to think it's the US Government doing these things. That changes every four or 8 years. By the time their "crimes" are fully exposed that regime is often out and a new one is in. Maybe even the next one after that., but the  media never really changes, nor the people behind the 
scenes pulling the strings, carrying out these hoaxes. 
 
                         Suppression of the no plane evidence definitely serves to carry out this agenda. By keeping the focus off the media, and on god knows who. We have had many callers into our radio show over the last year, all trying to argue planes hit the WTC, Pentagon etc.  They always end up in the same rhetoric "We need to get Bush, Cheney and their masters, those homosexual bastards" and on and on it goes, and on and on it  goes. Those guys will all be dead before too long, then what? You will have nothing more to say, and the next false flag hoax media attack will already be underway. And so the cycle repeats. 
 
James Sloan - The Real News Online.Com
www.TheRealNewsOnline.com         

          JUST ADDED NEW INFO TOO!!!!! NOW PHIL ENDORSES SEPTEMBER CLUES AFTER BANNING ME IN BIG PART FOR IT! If you saw this blog just scroll down to the big red letters JUST ADDED!!!

  I was undecided on whether or not to ever write this blog. I was going to be the bigger man again, let shots be fired and actually not respond. Now Phil Jayhan has tried to tie my family to 9/11!! This has gone way too far. Many people out there wonder why Brian S Staveley is no longer a member of Let's Roll Forums. I was a moderator and it's top radio host. I built them their radio station from scratch which was no easy task seeing as I had to teach myself via Google and at one point I was on air on 5 days a week pushing the 9/11 messages expressed on the forum. I AM IP BANNED???!!! For the crimes off what? Too much truth?

        Over the course of a very short time Phil made me a moderator(I will elaborate on the reason I believe why soon) After this I setup The Last American Broadcast for them. It was rather odd after building it and seeing so much interest from everyone especially Phil being excited about having a  platform for their message, that no one did any shows. They would always thank me like it was a big deal, yet never come on the air. Mike Dammann made an honest effort. He tried daily shows which I also produced, edited, uploaded, etc. Eventually he faded away and it was just me. Everyone has to work and it understandable. I had little work at the time and spent five days a week promoting the whole 9/11 message from Let's Roll Forums. Some of it was incorrect, much of it was right.

       Around December and January and probably later I asked Phil many times "Hey Phil wanna do a show" "We need to do a show soon together on 9/11"

         He showed no interest. Maybe he was busy? I hear raccoon season is booming in those months  :-)

          Regardless I was a moderator of the board and a constant contributor. I never said I was a top researcher as Phil implies. When investigating a certain 9/11 family, I was on the ground not the internet, the ground paying for my gas and these official documents for the forum. Searching out archives buildings, town halls and much more. That along the fact with the amount I pushed the message via other mediums I would say that is someone who is a MAJOR contributor to the site. Just Google The Last American. I did hundreds of shows probably for them. Odd the name of the site is www.PhilJayhan.com. Oddd name for something that was supposed to become this 9/11 video and audio archive. Self Promotion? NO?


          After a while it got old. I got suspicious of some of the activities at Let's Roll So I started doing shows just once a week on my own site which was already built. (The Site) www.TheRealNewsOnline.com

I made this move to not be so closely tied with anyone. Just be myself on my own network. A lot of people were wary of having me on due to being tied to PHil and that is a fact. I just wanted to do my own thing.

          6 months ago now I started to realize that much if not all of the collapse footage we were shown on tv on 9/11 was faked. It was CGI. This is absolute. Maybe not 100% of the footage and I don't want to go to that extreme now but I'd say over 90% of what you saw was faked. So are all the photos. Well this is groundbreaking stuff. Surely Phil wants to know about it and he does. I spent 6 hours showing him clips after clip and he showed no interest in it at all even though it was rather convincing and he never started a thread!!!! Remind you this is a site with probably over 100k threads. About all types of stuff and no  CGI collapse thread???? I wanted to learn how deep it went. At the time I didn't know it was so much of it.
HMMMMMmmmmmm

          Then I found more evidence of Computer Generated Imagery on 9/11 From ANOTHER source. I tried to show Phil and he flipped on me saying "This isn't gonna be a fucking shrine to Simon Shack"  I said Phil those videos aren't from Simon at all. "Well it looks like parts of his movie" I said well they are not from September Clues at all!! He went on and on about Simon and so I said"Have you even seen September Clues?"   He said NO!!! Not the whole thing.   LOL   That's funny! You got this guy in deep in the movement all this time and he hasn't seen the movie he's so quick to shoot down. That's a blatant lie or a serious ego problem. We will go with the blatant lie.


        Needless to say to there was no CGI thread started. He never mentioned it in chat.

         For the record Phil and I had become "friends" He would call constantly on Skype and many many times on my cell. We would talk 9/11 for days. sometimes 6 hrs at a a time. For a while I thought it was great. Then after all these newer developments, with all these going down I became suspicious. Anyhow I continued my investigating over there. I would read almost every 9/11 related thread on both Let's Roll and September Clues. I have no bias. I just want the F'n Truth!!

        It's well known that Phil and Simon Shack have a huge feud going. That's not my problem. If I can land an interview with the guy that made the one legit in my eyes documentary of 9/11 I'm gonna get him on. Not on Phil's site but on mine. I'll have whoever I want on. The interview with Simon went very well at the time but I know it set Phil off a little.

       A pilot from the town next to me allegedly was killed on 9/11 so it's hard enough for me to tell this story around here but I am relentless. Phil calls again this time at like 3am " I wanted to get you before I was drunk. LEts make this quick and we will finish tomorrow. "How many people live in Dracut MA Brian?" I said IDK about 30,000 Phil. He told me I was wrong and theres only 300 houses and 1055 residents in Dracut!! 'I have been studying satelite imagery all night and your lying. I said"Phil I could name 15 streets off the top of my head with more than 300 houses. Your way off. Then I said Phil I could go to the High School and find 1055 Students tomorrow. He then said all the kids were fake residents shipped in from all the surrounding communities which he tried to name off and at this point it was laughable. I let him go and said call me tomorrow. So now it's "Hollow Dracut"? LOL.

     I still maintained a friendship with Phil til he called me on the phone a week or so later. Mind you this is just a guy I know from the internet. He called at like 2am! On my cell. Not that out of the norm but never the less if I don't want answer, I don't have to. This went on for 3 nights. I have NO INTEREST IN HIS NEW THEORY!! I along with anyone I know would instantly disregard anything I've said on 9/11. It felt like it was to discredit me. So I i didn't want to talk about "Hollow Dracut" anymore. Its absurd and it's basically calling me either an idiot or a liar! This is the town next to me. There are 30,000 people there. I go there everyday. See tons of traffic and people. It's a bustling town. I am not obligated to answer the phone for Phil. At all hours of the night. I ignored him for three days yes. Big Deal!


        How did he respond?? He attacked me on his forum where I had earned many people's respect. As a matter of fact he attacked me relentlessly for almost a week!!! EVERY NIGHT IN CHAT. pages upon pages just trashing me, calling me an asshole, saying I've never done anything for LRF, never plugged them, I'm a dickhead, yadda yadda yadda.

       Guess what I did? Nothing I let it go til the emails came. There 4 in a row of him cussing me out, sending me info on Simon Shack like we are buddies now or something and says I see how you attack me, you have your guests do it. There was other emails where he asked if we were enemies now!!!  I remind you this is still with no response from me. Last contact was the Dracut call. All I have done to him is not returned his calls for 3 days. Big deal. I do it to my own friends. Real life friends.

       The next email he asked if I wanted WARFARE with him. Phil if that's the type of confrontation you want fine but this is to distract me and I won't let it. I will continue to get closer to the truth of 9/11 no matter which gatekeepers I need to hurdle.

      So now we are on 5-6 nights of total trashing of me and my character (a respected mod at the Lets Roll Forum) all in the chat for any member to read. Not even in his weak ass team chat. So what did I do. I let it go one more day. Me and Justin were doing a moon hoax show and I needed to prepare a lot. It was not about waitng to reply as much as putting the important things first. Well
then Emails Justin to talk sh%$ about us not sticking up for him against Simon Shack. Which wasn't even a huge insult so we let it die. He made an email about Simon to send to me though. Bad mouthing him, mysteriously after I was IP banned from LRF He and Simon are now buddies. So which one is it Phil ? You gonna ban his research or go visit Rome?? Then After being a gracious host to Simon the people on his forum (not all of em there are some great ones) trash me for a week, calling me a shill. Odd timing to say the least. It should be noted that an over 5 year member and serious contributor to their other radio shows James Sloan was also banned and my co host Justin Cooke was demoted! All over this and more bickering Phil intentionally started to weed out the good people.

      Saturday night I think it was he actually emailed me and said


Phil Jayhan Apr 24to me So, not sure what you want to do here. I have a radio show scheduled for Friday night. Are you willing to give me the log in information and send me the software link so I can figure out how to use it before Friday night?

If so, please let me know ASAP. This is one of the most important witnesses of 9/11 to ever come forward IMO and just because we aren't friends anymore, don;t think it should fall through the cracks.

So can you please let me know ASAP if your willing to help me or not, so I can rest, knowing I can do the show?

If your not going to help, all I am asking is an email reply back right away telling me so, so I am not left hanging and dangling. Can you at least send me an email letting me know?

Thanks,
Phil

After this week long barrage of insults and discredting I had the heart cause I love 911 truth so much I SAID YES!!!!!!!!!!!! After being called an asshole, cocksucker and all this in his chat for a week.


Brian Staveley Apr 25to Phil      I will show you how to set it all up




Phil Jayhan Apr 25to me Cool, thanks a lot Brian, I appreciate it. It's going to be a great interview. He saw it, the hollow with which we speak. He saw whats on the other side of this picture. Let me know how you want to do this and let me know.

I have one more reply then look what I wake up to in the chat!



Brian Staveley Apr 25to Phil      Female over tonight. we will talk tomorrow sometime.

So after a barrage of insults and you will see some. Threatening emails and everything else I AGREED TO HELP HIM BROADCAST HIS BULLLSH%^ SHOW WITH THE WITNESS TO THE HOLLOW TOWERS HE SAYS!!!.  I  agreed out of my heart. Now look at the chat overnight. That very night. Notice the date. Its one day later than our emails where I said yes. After being called a shill, an assh$#e and a cock^&cker by Phil! He tells his people I won't help and the radio show can't go on!! LOL. This is just minutes and hours after I said I'd help!.

     

                   I put it off one more day til after my radio show. I needed to focus on that so I let it all pass just one more day.


                   The night of the Moon Hoax Show Phil Jayhan an alleged friend goes on our comment wall and writes"Nice Promotion of Alex Jons"   LMAO! Anyone who has heard 5 minutes of us know we hate Jones, what he stands for and his misleading of everyone.We explain to anyone who brings him up and we go through his whole agenda!!! Phil knows this. We have done countless shows on it! Just like you've never seen September Clues right Phil? He really told me that when he flipped on me on those videos, just months ago.


      The next day I responded. So it must have been the Monday after the moon show, I'll look it up. I made a post on the forum. I am now IP BANNED FROM LET'S ROLL FORUMS!!!  ME!! MODERATOR, builder of the radio station and premiere host, just BANNED. I outgrew the gatekeeping Phil knows it, I know it and other know it!

If you wish to read the post it was written by me and titled something like "In Defense of myself I needed to write this"



       I pretty much wrote everything that was in this email in a forum post. His crazy ass then said the following. "Now Brian is bringing this into the public"  REALLY???? He's been ranting in front of any member about me for days in the chat and I will show you examples. Calling me names where if you tried it here in Lowell Phil, you'd have some serious issues. That's bringing it the public! Anything I said was on the phone or in email not of the forum, a very busy forum where a lot of researchers respected me well. You trash me and Justin on our comment wall DURING OUR LIVE SHOW. You brought it all in the public on BOTH OF OUR SITES!!!!!! Thousands saw that ah#@! So what does he do next he tells ppl I published personal phone calls we had!!! That's a strong accusation and a false one!!! His defintion of that- me quoting him from what he said to me about all this Dracut nonsense. Saying BRIAN STAVELEY PUBLISHES PERSONAL CALLS IS A STRONG LIE!!! But that's what Phil is about. Lies, Ego and gatekeeping.


          Have you started that CGI evidence thread yet Phil. Now after attacking me for having him on you and Simon your buddies right after I'm attacked on his forum. Very odd timing to say the least. You were a rude son of a bitch that acted like a crazed ex girlfriend because I didn't answer the phone and it was all planned. I knew It was coming. I called it to the day. People knew you were gonna attack me. You needed to get rid of a few us us, admit it. We weren't under the Jayhan mind spell anymore.


    What type of friend just cause they can't get in contact for days goes on the internet and trashes a friends and fellow moderator/researcher for a week on both our sites. Without a back and forth! That is the act of a snake. He said I never did anything for Lets Roll. Anyone want the archives with hundreds of hours of audio I did on The Last American for Phil. Any HONEST people left there there you know I was for real and I welcome you all to come listen to our shows and read our blogs here at www.TheRealNewsOnline.com. Soon I will have a much better forum also. If anyone can help with that, let us know.


I think we all know who the the real truth teller is here. You tell a lot of it but mix in so much bullshit and confusion your no more than another 9/11 gatekeeper.
You should get that ego checked too.

You went on for weeks now and still are. This response is warranted as many , many people email me asking why you attacked me. People are very wary of you Phil not me. Keep my name out your mouth and keep hiding the whole truth for the government and media. It won't stop from finding out more and more about this Hollywood style fraud hoax.

JUST ADDED

BTW now after this banning me off let's roll and all this suspicious activity look at the thread Phil put up!!!! So was I right the whole time?? I can not believe he is now praising Simon weeks after IP BANNING me, sounds like gatekeepping whatever I might say on it!

original URL to
LRF post
http://letsrollforums.com/september-clues-must-see-t28086.html?s=99948766b8bb5c137b6b29d47a16364f

I had to hide my IP to get on since I'm so evil!!!   Here is copy and paste in case the link don't work.But it should now I altered it.


I can't post the direct link so to Let's Roll Forums

Let's Roll Forums > The U.S. Government Conspiracy of 9/11 > 911 For the Tired, Weary, Hustled Masses September Clues - A Must See Movie for Every Person  First post by Phil!

Join Date: 23 Feb 2004Location: Middle EarthPosts: 22,830Threads: 2785Blog Entries: 28Thanked 7,938 Times in 2,914 Posts

This is actually from Phil Jayhan weeks after accusing me on having Simon Shack on so I could attack Phil via my guests. (Since that what I tend to do when I don't answer my phone. lol )


I want to thank Simon Shack for his time and dedication in making this most astounding 9/11 video. It is a compilation of his own research and his forum members, and other 9/11 Illuminaries who saw the hoax of 9/11 long before I, and long before most.

For all of the people, in all of the world, who took millions of hours of their own time researching 911, this single video will bring you to the very edge of the 9/11 mysteries, and leave only a few questions unanswered.

The first video of September Clues, was made in 2006. 

If a tree falls in the Forest, and there isn't a qualified 9/11 researcher or ass crawler to hear it, is it still wrong? And is it still a tree? 

I want to thank Simon and the Clues gang for bringing this video and making it, years ahead of it's time. (their colors are brown and yellow) 

Long before I was willing to open my mind to such an "outrageous conspiracy theory."

Now that most of the emotional impact and drama of 9/11 have vanished, I would ask every person on the internet to please watch September Clues. It will answer nearly every single question people have had about 911 since day 1. And was created in 2005-2006.

Isn't this a bit odd. First I am attacked for basically having Simon on. Phil goes on a tirade about me for a week. Sends me Stuff about Simon talking mad shit. Read the chats above. There is a lot about me and Simon. Now I'm IP banned off LRF(for trying to explain this stuff to Phil in part) and these guys are best friends now????? Then figuring I helped promote September Clues Forum and their information so much, let Simon says whatever he wanted on our show and then I'm attacked on September Clues for two weeks.  Something isn't adding up here.

So know after  outing me for showing him CGI collapse footage, not buying his wacky theory he is down with it all and actually kissing Simon's ass???!!!!!! HAHAHAAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Read the chats above from just days before. I'm the one they should be wary off??    Hahahaaha

Make sure you read some comments. A lot of members are seriously doubting his intentions just as I knew was coming!! Read the thread after Phil's ass kissing post of Simon!

Come join some real truthers. We are working on a better forum and could use help and we do a radio show once a week. Here is the link.

http://www.therealnewsonline.com/dose-of-reality-radio-show.html

Then just about a week after Phil's attacks on me and maybe 3 weeks after having Simon Shack on as a guest I was bombarded by people on his forum and labeled a gatekeeper and everything! This is AFTER I let them air their complete message on my air waves with little to no resistance to Simon's Theories. Don't Believe it the crap I had to put up with and this is after never twisting a word of theirs and honestly promoting them online on Facebook and other mediums as much as anyone. I am getting very close to the truth and I know I am trying to be discredited. The Hollow Dracut thing, The weeks of attacks on both sites. You call all read a few chats above and see how I was treated. It was no different on Clues. AFTER I gave then a great show, Justin as well and of course Simon. Very informational and I believe at least 90% or higher factual. Phil even told people I was a 9/11 agent!  All without even speaking to me for just a few days.

Anyways start on this thread where I am relentlessly attacked on www.Cluesforum.info. You really gotta see how unwarranted it was and again this is AFTER Simon himself liked the show yet still compared me to all these gatekeepers. Others were quite rude. Most members are very cool. As a matter of fact i'd say we have ten listeners from clues. Even several posted our link, It didn't stop the attacks though.

  Look how I was treated after giving them a great radio show.
  First here is the show. It is a must listen. I am NOT saying Simon's information is wrong. I think he has it close to nailed but the timing of all this is too odd. Now Phil supports Simon after cussing me out weeks before?? Then I'm banned on one and attacked on both biggest 9/11 forums.



Listen to this as you read the hit pieces on me. They have stopped. Thank god. This is our show with Simon Shack. We gave him free reign and hardly opposed any of his theories as I do believe 90% or more of it. I've seen so much of the evidence with my own eyes. His site is great. Please check it out but the forum  can be very discouraging! It has turned many off of the media fakery research!

Simon Shack, Brian S Staveley and Justin Cooke.

http://www.therealnewsonline.com/uploads/6/5/2/9/6529494/4-8-12.mp3

I post on page 8 of this thread. Attacks on me start on page 10!

http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=167&

My first post I believe was in page 8 on this thread on the clues forum. Just trying to be friendly. There was one or two positive posts by real members who have heard me on the air then the attacks came. Page 10 -16 the attacks on me are relentless and uncalled for. I tried so hard to call for peace. Hopefully we have it. It seems many seem to try to drive the good ones away, again. Yet there is more being hidden. Media fakery is the key to this event but there is more to it and they won't stop me and the other honest researchers I collaborate with from finding it. I hope you all take this very seriously. If you'd have similar experiences please comment below!!! Thank you to the honest researchers and members that do remain on both sites. I have received many emails and inboxes surrounding this and incredible support. I think we all know who the 9/11 agent is and it's not Brian S Staveley.
www.TheRealNewsOnline.com

           This blog is setup to follow along with our Moon Hoax Radio Special from Sunday April 22-12. There won't be a huge amount of text to read as we want you to follow along with our speaking during the show however like some of our other interactive blogs(9/11). I am going to post about four very important documentaries you need to see. The first are both short like 45 min and TOTALLY EXPOSE THESE GUYS WEREN'T ON THE MOON. The second is a follow up to the great exposed evidence in the first. You will see the astronauts so infuriated they are caught they actually punch the reporters in the face!!!

         I do not expect you to just believe us on a few pics or videos but these things I am putting forth next are very thorough analysis of all the images whether video or pictures. This is child's play really. Those two docs are called Dark Mission One, Two and Three. They are a little dry but will totally debunk all the NASA moon imagery. You will see WIRES picking astronauts up! Once you see that, what do you say next???


            We should note people in my era athletes and celebrities alike do thousands of interviews. How many has a man like Michael Jordan given?  You would think the first man to walk on the moon would still be booked with appearances, no??? He REFUSES TO GIVE A SINGLE INTERVIEW SAYING HE WALKED ON THE MOON!!

 Does that make sense to you???

Here are some ridiculous images for us to quickly look at. For much more view the documentaries provided.

This also shows a lot of the other trickery besides the Earth out the window like how they made the networks air the quality and resolution that they did.