Note, this blog is my personal opinion about the topic of eternal existence. They are my opinions based on my personal experiences and those of others in my life, and my personal research, logical deduction and discernment. I know for a fact from discussions with Brian and Justin they agree with me on many of these issues, but I delve quite deep into the topic here, and it must be noted that these opinions in their totality are of the writer and not necessarily the views of real news online, though I believe strongly in what I have written. It was my decision to put this disclaimer on, this is not censorship, but this is the most subjective topic we have dealt with, and there will simply never be wholesale agreement on this topic. Although, the same could also be said of everything we talk about on here.
We are eternal. Our body is merely a vehicle for our existence on this version of the earth plane. Once we die our spirit (soul and mind) leaves the body and moves on. There is overwhelming empirical evidence of an afterlife, and of our eternal existence, both before we chose to come here and after we leave, but so few truly understand this because of the focus on burden of proof, the science vs. religion, the creation vs. evolution debate.
Throughout my life there are many things I could never quite comprehend. I was always open minded, which is no surprise as to why I became a "conspiracy theorist". But that was much later in life. The most pondered question in history is without a doubt "what happens to us when we die?". The second would be I assume "are we alone in the universe?". Though there is some parallel between the two questions, many wrongly assume we will never know the answer to one or both. The truth is we already know the answer to what happens to us when we die. Our mind knows, but our brain has to learn. It is a pre requisite of coming here.
Most of conventional religion focuses around a soul, a heaven and a hell, but in spirituality you hear just as much about the mind and the spirit as you do about the soul. The central idea is the mind and brain being separate. The brain is a receiver, a learning computer of sorts. It is responsible for all our cognitive functions, sending messages to the body to move etc. But our mind is a far greater, separate entity, our mind exists outside of our physical body. Most people have heard of spirits and souls, but only choose to use the term "mind" as an interchangeable way to refer to the brain. They simply never give it much more thought than that.
I was never partial to religion growing up, but neither Atheism. Atheism seems to take the approach of "when we die we die that is it", and that conventional religion where a Deity creates and rules over all of us is the only alternative explanation anyone has ever come up with, and to "debunk that notion". It's easy to identify as agnostic, and I effectively did for a long time, but one day it just seemed like too easy a way out. Not that it is a cop out per say, it is a quite reasonable stance to take on the issue given the amount of lies we have been told. However I’ve never tolerated unanswered questions before, so why with this one, the greatest question of all? Just put it to the back of the brain. "We can't know, no one knows. We were obviously not meant to know". "It can't be proved". I only liked the sound of Christianity because it seemed the nicer option of the two. The word Atheist was only made known to me as an older teenager. That word was simply never used in Religious Instruction, or anywhere else in the school curriculum.
Not meant to know? Doesn't that imply that there is something to know, and that it is being kept from us?
To many of us atheism is a dirty word. It never inspired me in the slightest. Why would anyone be an Atheist? You can't prove there isn't a God. Even they admit that. You cannot prove a negative is their answer. The burden of proof is on others to prove there is a God or Gods, or an afterlife.
That philosophy never sat well with me. First of all, we don't "know" where we came from. If you admit we don't know where we come from, and how we got here, how can you say for sure you know where we aren't going? How can you proclaim to know absolutely that there is nothing after death? Have you died to find out, and if so, how is it that you are among the living to claim this? No, Atheism is a logical fallacy.
The burden of proof is not on anyone. It is not a burden of proof issue. If anything though, Atheists ignore a lot more than even staunch religious people do. There are numerous things that point to a greater existence; dreams, lucid dreams, experience with spirits, out of body experiences, near death experiences, clairvoyants, psychics, ghosts, haunted houses, astrology, Ouija boards, Séances, coincidences, irony etc. At least religion for the most part acknowledges these phenomena, though they do describe it as dangerous and to be avoided. Atheists basically dismiss all of it as nonsense, telling all the millions and millions of people who have experienced it first hand that they must be either wrong or mistaken. Telling somebody else that their independant life defining experience was wrong. What could possibly be more arrogant and presumptuous than that? It's one thing to cast doubt or aspersion, to say it could be either or, that is constructive, to tell someone they are wrong. That’s fucking bullshit. Think about it, if even just one of the people who has had any of those experiences is correct, Atheism is already disproved. Could so many be mistaken? Though in reality strictly speaking atheism is simply the rejection of a supreme Deity, not a spiritual afterlife, but pretty much all Atheists simply focus on disproving religion and poking holes in the bible, so they reject afterlife. "When you die you die that’s it". What if there was another alternative?It is NOT a burden of proof issue. One thing about many Atheists that always frustrated me was the presumed use of science to disprove an afterlife. The claim is that science has answered the questions for us. But think of many of the greatest or regarded as the greatest scientists ever, Albert Einstein, Sir Isaac Newton, Nikola Tesla, even inventors like Tesla (Tesla was a physicist also) Thomas Edison, other scientists like Galileo, Nicholas Copernicus, none of them identified as Atheists, in fact they resented when they were called as such. It would be a stretch to call all of them creationists, but many quotes attributed to them tended to pointed closer to that direction. Einstein remarked like many of us, the position of the earth in the solar system, a little to the left, we burn up, a little to the right and we freeze to death, the impossibility of a "non created universe". He also expressed an admiration for Buddhism. The conditions being so perfect for life, the odds are infinitesimal it could happen by chance. Sir Issac Newton was a Christian, as were a lot of people of his time. Tesla is perhaps the greatest inventor/scientist of all time, he was very spiritual, saying that he felt there was a place in the center of the universe where knowledge is stored, our brains are receivers, but indicating that our mind exists outside our physical body, as per spirituality.
Whatever the case, science has not disproved anything related to these issues. There are many scientists who believe in an afterlife. There are many who do not. Though this hurts a lot of people, it's an issue that is BEYOND science. Science is great, but limited, like everything in this earth plane. This is not nor has it ever been the kind of thing you can prove in a laboratory with an experiment, though there are some indicators. In my view old school science accepted there was an afterlife, but that is an opinion. The science is never settled. Yes Science tends to be the field with the highest amount of Atheists. I know in this writing I am dismissing a lot of conventional meaningless coincidence to explain things, but it doesn't mean they don't exist. It could be a random fact too. Dentists for example have the highest suicide rate of any profession. But can you really garner any conclusion from that, or demonstrate a cogent cause and effect process?There are indicators though. One of the most basic accepted laws of science is that energy can neither be created nor destroyed, only transformed. Another is for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. How are these laws compatible with death being an ultimate end? These are accepted laws of science. I'm not even saying they are correct. But for those whom use Science to disprove afterlife, that seems a contradiction in terms. Although it is one of the lesser pieces of evidence, it has also been established that immediately upon death, the human body has been shown to lose weight. Not a great deal, but around 21 grams. There seems to be no biological explanation for this, and it has been attributed to a soul or spirit leaving the corpse. Of course it is often debated as to the cause, but it remains an unexplained phenomena that would be entirely consistent with a spirit leaving the body.
But regardless I have never been in the habit of telling people their experiences are misguided. My older sister claims to have had a frightening experience with an Ouija board as a teen with her friends. So have thousands of other people who swear it moved all by itself. Are they all lying? My mother claims she saw an angel at or during one of or the most trying periods of her life, I never assumed her to be false. I have numerous friends who have had experiences with spirits and haunted houses/ghosts. Many said there was a ghost in a bedroom in my grandparents old house. Another friend was present during a possession at a haunted house during his childhood, there are around 9 corroborating witnesses. Spirits exist. I am able to remember most of these things as I have a better memory than most. I bet lots of people told them they were wrong, maybe they made them doubt themselves. Maybe they are lying for attention? Nobody can claim to be able to spot a liar 100% of the time, and all of us do lie, but I have a pretty good radar with people as to when they are being untruthful, for example many girls I dated/courted with claimed to have been raped. I know 90% of them were being truthful, the story never changed each time it was recited, it was told with absolute clarity being a life defining event they would never forget even the minor details of. 2 or 3, the story changed, and the behavior during and after was inconsistent with such an event. In regards to every last person who has ever told me about any experience with spirits/ghosts, the story remains vivid and the same every time, even when they are re telling me and have forgotten that they told me in the past, in fact I often feign that they never told me just to hear them re tell it. They have no reason to lie to me, and their stories also match up with what other people experience, I believe them. It is truly mind blowing when you think about how many people have had these experiences but never tell another soul about it, out of fear. Or put it down to a simple dream or hallucination. We know with sleep paralysis people do this.
You just have to think about it logically. I'm not saying they know everything or are always right, but there are clearly people with psychic gifts. Would tarot card readers, psychics, astrologists, fortune tellers etc ever make a dime or a consistent living if they were relying on guesswork? I can't see how.
But like with anything in this arena, it is not a proof based thing. You can only learn from your own experiences. Those who have never had spiritual experiences often dismiss them. Those who have are left in no doubt about it. Not many people remain neutral or open which is a shame.
I often wonder, as do many, why it was back in biblical times or a long time ago that it seemed mostly everybody accepted there was a higher power. It could be because of primitiveness or brainwashing, but I doubt it somehow. Aspects of conventional religion obviously rely on fear and control, but I don't think this explains it. I think a long time ago, it was obvious to everyone where they came from. For some reason, in fact many reasons, in this modern day world, walls we have built, within and around, have made us more close minded than ever. We always assume that back then people knew very little. Ancient Aboriginals talked a lot about things like astral projection (out of body experiences), as did the Inuit people. What if they knew MORE? Sure, where technology is concerned we have advanced. And in other ways. But in how many ways have we gone backwards? Too many to list. It is asinine to assume that people back then didn't in fact know MORE about issues of greater importance, just because they couldn't post on facebook about it.
Why then is it our instinct to imagine our deceased loved ones watching over us? Contrary to popular opinion, this is NOT any idea that comes from religion, in fact going to a heaven is a different idea, you cannot be privy to or have any connection to this screwed up earth and be living in any kind of bliss. It is our instinct to think of this. It is our instinct to KNOW this. It could be our fear of death projected, it could be our longing to see them again, it could just be it is easier to explain death to children (particularly of another young person) this way. Atheists often claim we tell our kids things that we know for a fact aren’t true to make the harshness of life easier (eg. Santa Clause, the Tooth Fairy) but eventually we grow up and accept our fate. But that answer doesn't satisfy me. I am not a parent at the time of writing this, none of that is the reason I accept deceased relatives have been with me in spirit. I accept it because I have FELT it. Not once but many times. It is not a hallucination. We imagine our relatives moving on because we know they do, it's burned into us, whether we want to deny it or not. We say Rest In Peace because we acknowledge they are travelling into the unknown where the negative will attract such and the positive beautiful spirits will rest easy. It is always perplexing seeing people who identify as atheist using the R.I.P acronym. Why? You know or feel you know it's irrelevant, they will rest easy, they will do nothing but rest, because there is nothing left, according to your beliefs. Maybe you are just conforming to society, or maybe you are just kidding yourselves. Maybe I am kidding myself too, but I will never presume to tell anyone that their unique experiences are null and void either. That’s narcissistic.
Creation vs. Evolution/Religion vs. Atheism often reminds me of left-right politics. In fact I listen to them go at it and I think "You guys have so much more in common than you care to admit", though I doubt either party would thank me for the comparison. The absurdity of politics is present in the Creation vs. Evolution debate. The idea one group of people can always be right 100% of the time and the other always wrong 100% of the time is a logical fallacy for imperfect human beings. Whether both sides like it or not, they are both responsible in large part for our limited understanding as a society. The idea that the afterlife/eternal existence and religion are INTERCHANGABLE is burned into most people’s brain. What if both Creation and Evolution are wrong/incomplete?
To many people, the earth has obvious handprints of creative sculpting on it, compared to other planets, however in other ways it's also obvious we have evolved as a species and as a planet. The divide is just another illusion. Just like religion, just like politics, anything to keep us controlled. It is worth noting though and so often forgotten that creation does take two forms. Creation of us as people, and the creation of the planet we occupy, the earth plane. Could this earth have been created, was it always here, does it predate our spirits, or did we make it? Did we always co exist? And then, there is us. Our existence being eternal certainly doesn't co-exist with a God creating us from scratch, even if that God did know us "in the womb" or even before then as the bible says. That’s possibly why in Christianity abortion is generally a big sin, whilst in Spirituality many feel abortion is not a sin at all, since a spirit may have planned to only occupy the womb for a short time before dying. Miscarriages also fall into this category, though blame isn't usually apportioned to people for those. It's an interesting and refreshing way to consider two of life’s cruelest "mistakes". How could God ever let that happen or send a child to the womb only to destroy it? What kind of sick plan would that be, even if that soul did inherit heaven afterwards? But if we as "God" sent ourselves to learn life lessons, and the mother and father involved, and then that plan all comes together after the passing of all or even during life, it's not such a cruel event after all. Tickets on earth are in high demand after all. The abortion debate certainly does bring a lot of hatred from many camps, another divide I am quite sure the global elite don't mind in the slightest.
How do I know I am eternal? The reasoning is quite straightforward. First of all, you cannot get something from nothing here. It's the chicken and the egg. How did we get here? Where did we come from? Two people need to fuck for someone to be born, they can't come from one person. Not way back when anyway. Contrary to popular opinion, even Sciences best guess, the Big Bang Theory, doesn't purport to explain what happened in the VERY beginning. It is an obvious logical deduction in the very least that there is a supreme entity that is not subject to the same laws and limitations as we are on this earth plane, you can call it God, you can call it whatever you wish. It must exist. It exists in fact within US. We were sent here by ourselves, our spirit, our mind, to occupy our body for a brief time, to learn on this lower earth plane. When we leave and our spirit departs our body dies but we move on. Our family members here on earth may or may not be in our spiritual family, but deceased ones will certainly greet us on the other side, as will our higher spiritual being even whilst we are here.
How do we know this? Amongst other things, dreams, out of body experiences and near death experiences. Most people are familiar with NDE's, however many dismiss them as a dream or hallucination. There are numerous reasons why this is impossible. Not just improbable, but reasons taken in their entirety, impossible.
First of all, when you examine the accounts, they are all revolving around the same thing. They all involve floating out of and above one’s body once being clinically dead, often seeing medics working on them in the hospital or on the scene of an accident/murder. Then going up through a tunnel, often being met by deceased family members, Jesus, and a myriad of other people. They experience the unique and fantastic feeling of weightlessness flying up the tunnel, where they are almost always met by a voice asking if they want to go further, or being told it is not their time yet, they must go back. Then they are sent back quickly through the tunnel much faster and land back in their body. The feeling of being totally pain free floating outside the body is a unique one and nobody who has ever been outside their body will know it. If it were a dream or hallucination that our body makes at or just prior to death, then wouldn't everybody be having a different dream? A few might have the same one, but how would everyone have almost the exact same experience? If, as Atheists claim, our dreams are just manifestations of existing thoughts, wouldn’t everyone have a mostly different one? Yes, most of us ponder all our lives about life after death and seeing loved ones after we die, so maybe that would be in the hallucination, but most of us are unaware of any tunnel or feeling of weightlessness being a spirit, this stuff is never talked about openly. People would have no reason to have this in their thoughts in the first place.
Secondly, there are many, many documentaries and accounts of emergency room doctors and surgeons who have had patients who have had NDE's. This phenomena is not a secret or hidden, or a conspiracy theory, it's just not talked about openly these days. The mainstream has no interest in it, preferring to instead control us with religion vs Atheism and left right politics. But there is an over abundance of information if people seek it out. It is just more common in the last 10-20 years because of advances in medical technology it is "easier" to bring a patient back from clinical death. Though it is worth noting that television has for years painted a totally unrepresentative picture of resuscitation. Even arresting in an ideal hospital setting with professionals all around you, hooked up to machines, there is only a 2-4% chance of being brought back. Many might be entitled to feel it was more like 40-50% based on television shows showing CPR. Even though TV isn't real, it has strong effects on our subconscious we don't often realize. Patients often talk about watching for a time being worked on, and can recall how many people came into the room, the clothes they were wearing and the exact things they did. These people came into the room after they were unconscious or clinically dead and had left before they regained consciousness. Some also floated up through the roof of the hospital where they had never been and were able to identify objects in there and people went up later and checked and confirmed it. There are also numerous people who were brought back to life after flat lining from a coma, and despite having been measured to have almost, or zero actual identifiable brain function, had these vivid experiences. These people cannot have been dreaming or hallucinating.
Nor can people on record who were born blind who had near death and/or out of body experiences in full, vivid color. We know that people who go blind after birth dream in color, but people who are born blind do not, they dream in shapes and patterns throughout their lives. If even one of these blind at birth people had a NDE in color, that already proves it correct, as they have done something their physical body is demonstrably incapable of doing, having never learned color. Saying these experiences are dreams or hallucinations is wrong. The same reverse situation is also true of people born deaf who experience crystal clear sound in their NDE's/OBE's. There is far too much empirical evidence to dismiss the phenomena as a dream or hallucination. There are also numerous people who have had a friend or relative simply astral project from a different location and visit them, then afterwards explain to them what they did in detail when they were not in the room to have been able to see it.
We dream every single night. For a myriad of reasons we may not always remember it. Every single night for our entire lives we have left our bodies, we are just not consciously aware of it. Astral Projection is where you project a copy of your consciousness onto other planes of existence, but your physical body still maintains all its functions like heartbeat and brain function and digestion. Of course many dreams are garbled and don't have any deeper meaning, but many are communications. Dreams and Music are the two biggest gateways to our soul, but of course any technology can be used to communicate. Can you imagine a life without music? Nobody can. Music is an integral part of our psyche. Spirits often use music to communicate messages to us.
Take the view of an atheist, why would we dream at all? Why wouldn't our body just go into a sleep mode like a computer for 8 hours? What would the point of dreams be if they don't mean anything or have consequence? Think about it. Atheism is kind of like nihilism. Life has no purpose. That never made sense to me. We're born we live we die. I don't think so. Most of us follow a path, have a reason to be here. I appreciate that what does and doesn't make sense is often a function of circumstance, but the idea some of us are born into absolute wealth, others born in poverty, some born with working bodies other disabled, some with great intelligence, others borderline intellectual functioning, never made sense to me. Luck of the draw? We are here for a reason, to learn, to experience. It makes absolutely no sense to me some people can be so lucky their entire lives and others never. Some people live to be 100 years old, other poor souls die in the womb never tasting fresh air even once, leaving their mothers and fathers heartbroken. No, there is a reason for everything in this game of life. It also shows that material possessions/fame are not important. Those famous on this planet may not be right away or at all on the other side, likewise those who have done great work on earth may be revered on the other side.
Much along the points of the NDE's before, recurring dreams are a very real phenomena. Polls and surveys have shown there are a definite top 5-10 recurring dreams we all have. For example personally one of the top 5 and the one I definitely have the most is being back at school, usually high school. Others include a plane crash, despite me having no fear of flying. If, dreams were just manifestations of thoughts, we would have recurring dreams, but would we really all have the same recurring dreams? Unlikely. It is not just surveys, everybody I have talked to on the topic all have the same top 5-10 recurring dreams, and the exact same ones almost every time. Yes, many of us had our best years at high school, so it would make sense to have that recurring dream, but what if we don’t think of that often? Many people have the plane or car crash dream despite not driving or flying. There are also many things we think of a lot more often that we never actually dream of. You cannot establish a cause and effect for dreaming based on how often you think of something. It doesn't always work that way, dreams have deeper meaning and if something isn't important, you most likely won’t dream of it despite how often you think of it. Dream analysts have shown that by looking at the recurring dream and events in your life there will be most likely a deeper meaning and representation to the dream that correlated to events in your life.
Scientists have never been able to explain why despite how many years we dream, unless we launch a lucid dream, we can never know that we are dreaming. It feels so real, in fact it often feels more real than life, despite being unable to recall getting to the locales or certain aspects being not what they should/would be. Again why is this? Despite how absurd or impossible circumstances and ambience can be in a dream, it always feels so real. It is because it is real. The projection is actually happening, and you are outside of your body though not in this physical plane. We also all fall back into our bodies in bed at some point. That’s what that famous feeling of "falling" in bed is, that sensation that we all have and are often curious about. You can fall back in from being just out of it, halfway out, or miles away.
They also can't explain how we can SENSE so vividly in our dreams. Not only can we feel, we can feel pain, we can touch, we can eat, we can taste, we can sense. When we kiss in dreams we can feel it, when we have sex in dreams we can feel ourselves orgasm, despite often times not having an actual wet dream, which can be confirmed when you wake up by an absence of semen stains. Sex often feels BETTER in dreams than in real life. How is that possible? Why can we taste food and drink in our dreams. When you hug someone you can feel their arms around you. Their warmth, their aura. How can any of this be possible if we are not actually experiencing it? People who astral project have confirmed you can eat on other planes. Yes our brains can recall smells, tastes, sounds/songs and feelings/sensations when we are awake, but not very vividly. Not with 1/10th of the vividness we FEEL it with in our dreams. Dreams are obviously a gateway to the other side.
It's also worth remembering that the majority of people dream in the first person. 3rd person dreams have certainly been reported but seem to be far less common and many including myself don't have them at all. This is further evidence pointing to an actual experience taking place. If dreams were just random projections of our desires and existing thoughts, wouldn't dreams in the 3rd person where we see ourselves be much more common, or perhaps the norm? Especially in this day and age with so many photographs, so much social media and television, and so many people who focus on their looks and appearance, spend hours at the gym or in front of the mirror, the single image of our face and body is burned into our mind as much as or more than any other. Why then do we not tend to dream of it? Because it probably doesn't matter in the grander scheme of things, that’s why. It will be but a rotting, stinking pile of flesh once we move on. That’s why I also think the focus too many humans have on gravesites and final resting places is sometimes unhelpful. Don't get me wrong, it's nice to have a place of remembrance, a place to go to. But at the same time it could cause tunnel vision and place too much emphasis on the earth body. Communicating with spirits is just as important. That’s why quite frankly I don't give a toss whether I am cremated or buried at this point. There are many ways we can remember and embrace those gone before us, and we shouldn't feel guilty for not visiting grave sites, as long as we remember in other ways, and never forget. Never forget to remember, and your loved ones will live on IN YOU. Through you and as a part of you. Keep their spirit alive here.
The idea our mind and consciousness exists outside/beyond our body also explains why our short term memory can go but our long term memory almost always remains. Like Tesla and many others theorized, could our memories/knowledge or at least segments of, actually be stored outside of our body? It would explain why scientists have never pinpointed the exact location memories are stored in the brain. The idea that the mind exists independently and outside of the brain/body is being more and more endorsed in mainstream Science. Boston scientists recently published a study concluding that dreams do take place in a parallel universe. Mathematicians also accept overwhelming probability that a parallel universe indeed exists. Comparing a brain to a computer isn't always helpful, but think of computers through history. They always need upgrading to store memory. Eventually they need replacing. Yet from the beginning of time, it seems our brain can retain unlimited long term memory, even with little training or exercise. The most that can go wrong with our brains are tumors and Alzheimer’s, or depression/mental illness, or brain damage and concussion. But even then, in the vast bulk of cases long term memories remain or eventually return. Everyone recalls memories from age 3-5 onward. It seems storage of memories and data is not always, if ever finite. No matter how primitive technology was, or how advanced it will be in 1000 years, our mind will always trump it. Not even mentioning that we are seeing but not a fraction of what we are capable of in greater realms. Perhaps this is because our mind and spirit exists in different planes beyond our bodies, and will always trump anything here. This would also explain why brain transplants appear to be impossible in any time. Each of our brains are unique receivers linked to our greater consciousness. Sever the link, and your earth body dies. I often wonder if we are conscious from age 3 backwards into the womb, but it gets temporarily wiped at some point after that. Who knows what lessons we may have learned but don't remember yet during our time in the womb and through ages 1-4. As any of us who have been around toddlers know, even at 2 years of age and sometimes younger, they speak with amazing clarity and are clearly conscious beings with amazing recall of events. In fact people often recall being alert as children, being able to astral project even easier than they can as an adult. Children often have gifts and claim to see entities. Maybe we are more mortal as adults than children. It's impossible to know though. That information like certain others appears to be unavailable to us here. I know for a fact that I am certainly not the only one who swears black and blue toddlers have told me many things about me/life that they almost certainly would have no way of knowing.
On that note, I have always wondered why we count our age from the day we were born. Technically we should add 9 or so months to our actual age, or at least several, because regardless of what people believe about fetal rights, there is a cut off point long before we pop out where we are fully formed humans. Just another example of the self, or system imposed limitations we place on ourselves not to think of the grander picture. Being that I was 2-3 weeks overdue, I am definitely a little older than my age and will always see myself that way.
The brain is a receiver. Many of us can't visualize our brain as children, often picturing some elaborate computer, and are often underwhelmed when we see an actual brain. I have never believed that organ is capable of producing our entire consciousness. Not even close. It's obviously a receiver responsible for all our cognitive function, and is truly amazing in it's own right, but I have had the hardest time believing it is capable of producing my consciousness. Not even close.
How did I arrive where I am now? It's not something that happens overnight. I would say over a period of about 2-3 years through numerous experiences I confirmed much of what I already felt I knew for much of my life. It's not one single experience, nor is it ever likely to be. I didn't have any experiences with spirits or haunted houses or ghosts as a child, at least that I recall. Nor was I touched too much by death personally. When a childhood friend committed suicide a couple of years ago, and I went back to the place we hung out as children, memories flooded back, emotions boiled over, and I could feel her with me. The thing is, I had lost contact with this girl for 11 years, and had been back to that place numerous times in the years between, but those memories were gone, I never recalled them. Nor did I recall them in the 2-3 days after I learned of her passing, but once I went to that location, the memories came flooding back. Regardless, this emotional moment was not in my head, as when I went back there a year later again, it was not the same. Though I did go on to have later experiences with her. We can definitely feel deceased people watching us.
It is not coincidence. It can't be connecting dots after the fact. These are only the experiences I remember after becoming aware, imagine all the thousands and thousands that happened during life that I never picked up on. During a much more recent time period a friend who I knew from online also died. We used to post in a music group a lot, along with hundreds of other people. thousands and thousands of different songs with many friends of mine, both from "real life" and online. Not only did I feel her watching over me, with me at times, but sitting down one evening thinking of her, a song randomly came to my mind and I played it, as you do. Never thought much about it at the time and kept playing music, but listening to the song it seemed to attract the strongest vibes from her. A week later whilst searching the music group I did come across the song. No coincidence she posted she loved it from her childhood. But not only that, the song was defined by the artist as being about being able to live your life true to who you are, not caring what others think of you, and don't be a gatekeeper just out of fear of judgment. Live the life you planned for yourself. The song was Karma Chameleon by the Culture Club. As a "conspiracy theorist", what could possibly be a greater message to send in a song? Many could accuse me of just connecting dots after the fact that aren't there, but they will never comprehend that anything being written is about a past experience. When you live through it and notice it as it happens, you realize just how real it is. That is why the written word, whilst powerful in it's own right, is not the best way to convey a message or to learn. Experience is. Knowledge is not power. Applied knowledge is power. Learning knowledge makes you a person with power, applying your learnt knowledge makes you a powerful person.Realization that songs you have liked all your life often describe your life to a tee is bliss. You realize these issues are in songs and popular culture everywhere and always have been. Songs have different meanings to different people, always will, but lyric interpretation is phenomenal. Especially songs that I came to know in the previous 2-3 years of my life I felt an awakening taking progress, though not always understanding what was occurring at the time. Peter Gabriel has always been one of my favorite artists and I see the spiritual side of his music right off the bat. Mike and the Mechanics "Silent Running" is profound. Queensryche's "silent lucidity" also. Trains "drops of Jupiter" in my opinion is a beautiful song about a soul astral projecting through our solar system. Paul Simons "slip sliding away". pied piper - Crispian St Peters, Kansas - Carry on my wayward son, river of dreams - Billy Joel, The Who - Who are you, live - lightening crashes, Christopher Cross - Sailing, Queen - Kind of Magic. It is truly amazing when you see references to this topic and of astral projection in lyrics throughout music you have loved all your life. I personally believe many artists sing about these feelings as it doesn't seem socially a topic that anyone wants to talk about beyond religion. Many artists just pick up the pen and write and don't even know what their song is about. People who were put here to make music may not always realize the greater significance of their work. Even conventional sayings like "the light at the end of the tunnel" is about the near death experience of going up through the tunnel and towards the light. Most people don't even realize that though. They just think it means the silver lining in the cloud. They don't think about what it really means. Music is the gateway to the soul. I believe our musical tastes describe us as a person. So much can be learned about ourselves just from listening to music. They may even describe our destiny. It was indeed a spooky revelation when I realized something about a deceased family member. He died a long time ago and I only have snippets of what people have told me about him. However one thing I have noted people telling me many times over the years was that his favorite artist was Meat Loaf. This seemingly insignificant fact has been repeated to me over a handful of times and I never forgot it. Well, look no further than his signature album, Bat out of hell. The significance, the song bat out of hell is about someone dying in a road accident. This family member died in a car crash before I was born. The line "breaking out of my body, and flying away, like a bat out of hell" is self explanatory. The song has nothing to do with hell. But the entire album is littered with references to car crashes and dying in one. The song title Paradise by the dashboard light is profound in itself. All revved up and no place to go. Heaven can wait. And finally, for Crying out Loud is a song about a dying lover saying goodbye to his soul mate and thanking her for everything, this family member having, in actuality, died at a young age and left a child fatherless. This is a profound exact description of the life defining event, the life and death of this person. This is no meaningless coincidence. Nor is it just the once. I have had these over and over again, each more profound than the last. There is just too many to list and they are an ongoing phenomena.
After trying astral projection for a while, I finally launched an OBE from a lucid dream. I physically floated out of my body. I was paralyzed by fear and thought of my body as id read to do so to end an astral projection and it worked. I woke up. Despite achieving the success I wanted, I found the experience frightening. Yet I didn't encounter anything bad. It wasn't as terrifying as sleep paralysis, but I wanted out. I guess I just was too tied to my body at that point. But the unique feeling of floating out of the body combined with the terror is something I have never experienced in a dream before or since. Even in my plane crash/death dreams I always accept my fate with poise and wake up apon death. This terror was genuine. I hope when I am ready I can have many more experiences and finally voyage beyond this room.
It's also worth noting that many people have had dreams or nightmares of fighting, and woken up with real injuries on their bodies, or discovered injuries on their bodies they cannot account for and have no recollection of receiving. This also points to dreams being "real". I myself have woken with injuries after fight dreams, injuries which are in shapes and patterns I have never seen before and are not consistent with someone grabbing or scratching, having experienced that injury many times before. We have all experienced during the day finding bruises/cuts/welts on our bodies that we have no recollection of receiving, in fact cannot have received here. But if you think back to your dreams/nightmares, if you can still remember them, you may recall fighting an entity on the astral plane. Skeptics claim that the injuries are caused during sleep by the dreamer causing them, however the injury patterns are often very inconsistent with self caused injuries. Sometimes the injuries are even on the back or in the middle of the spine and are only noticed when/if the person sees their reflection in a mirror, in an area people can't reach during sleep, so unless they were out of the bed sleepwalking, cannot have caused those injuries themselves. It shows how far reaching some will go to deny reality and tell others their experiences are incorrect. Another thing that confirms OBE's are not dreams or hallucinations is when people are moving and look into a mirror they see something truly amazing. Their glowing spirit reflected in the glass. I remember looking into a mirror as a child and wondering if the room reflected back in the image was somewhat of a parallel universe. If I could somehow get into that mirror, I could unlock the gateway to the other side. I wasn't far off I don't think.
Having said that, it is worth noting that many humans do have a natural fear of death. That does create an inherent bias to want to believe in something else/higher existence. It is largely impossible to be entirely neutral. On the other hand, many people detest life and hope death is the end. Fear of the unknown/blackness can be very unbecoming. Naturally though, it is certainly possible to go too far the other way and dismiss everything as a meaningless coincidence or irony, in the name of objectivity, when in reality you may be actually over compensating and ignoring the obvious. We see this all throughout life, but particularly here. Conspiracists often say, there is no such thing as coincidence. I prefer to say there is no such thing as MEANINGLESS coincidence. Coincidences certainly exist, but most of the time, they mean something. They convey a message to you, they explain. Of course, as said, many dreams can be mumbled and have no greater meaning. But profound ones convey much, and once you are aware, you will know exactly the difference between the two.
Another thing that pre disposes us to believing in higher power is loneliness. In a world full of people who invariably let us down, the idea of an all loving God and never being totally alone is very comforting. That’s a good thing! But God is also US. We are never alone, nor have we ever been. Our guides/relatives/family are always with us in spirit. We are all God. God is love. In a world where people often ridicule those with unique perspective, it is comforting knowing how I am inspiring those gone before me and how they will be learning from me here, perhaps watching with pride. That does make the going easier when people from all quarters call you crazy for your beliefs. We need to know we are not alone, life is much easier that way. But we need not the fear that organized religion often brings with it. The weight of your shoulders once you realize life has purpose is immense. It's a much healthier way to live.
Finally, explaining death to our children is the hardest part of being an adult, and a discussion we will eventually have to have with them. Atheists rightly point out that few could look a child in the eye and say their favorite person has just faded into blackness forever. It is much easier to explain they have gone to a better place (heaven). But as I have demonstrated, it is much closer to the actual answer.
How do you become spiritual? It's not instant "salvation". I don't ever wish to define it. Obviously my views would be defined as spirituality, but I refuse to define it in terms, there are simply no words great enough to describe our eternal existence. "Salvation" is earned as it is received, nobody gets it on a plate and nobody gets a free guaranteed pass immediately upon death either. Your beliefs do NOT make you a better person, your behavior and attitude does. Love makes the world go around. Superior belief is the gateway to superior living, but you cannot have one without the other. Just as it's absurd to say someone would instantly go to heaven after murdering 50 people just because they found God in Jail but a person who lead a great loving life never hurting anyone but didn't accept Jesus as their savior will burn in hell forever. I reject eternal hell. Even many Christians do, I believe the bible is true on many things, I believe there was a person called Jesus Christ, I believe in God too, but God is in all of us, we are all God. Many things were inserted a long the way, often through fear, to control people, eternal hell is one. It's a logical fallacy that an all loving God would send at least 66% of his creations (2/3 of the world isn't Christian so would automatically go there no matter what) to burn in hell forever, everyone knows this. Who would seriously want any part of that if it were true? Nobody said life after death will always be easy, or that there aren't personal hells, but damnation does not exist. You in many ways go where you believe. If you are a negative person, you will have a low spiritual level. If you are a loving person you will soar far and high. You will stay on the lower planes until you are able to change or are helped out. We like to believe there is some place where murderers and evil people will linger forever, but it's not true. Everything happens for a reason and we may very well chose our date of death and how we die before we come here. Even the people we detest most in life, are there for some lesson or greater purpose for us. I believe our bodies are immortal to a point but we also have an expiration date, a pre determined time of death where we will expire on this plane of existence and move on.
I also find Astrology very compelling, my star sign is Cancer, being born on June 23, and all descriptions I read of Cancerians described my personality traits perfectly. From my tight fistedness with money, being emotional and wearing my heart on my sleeve, to careful planning of life and the future, to preferring routine/organization and plan over spontaneity. Compatibility charts described all 10 or so girlfriends/courtships I'd had to this point and our relationships/dramas/arguments more perfectly than I ever could, not just right on some things, but 110% on every area, even things I didn't fully realize, as if I were writing it myself. The description of those girls personalities were also all spot on. The one girl who was my biggest "the one that got away" story that we all have, the one I loved more than any other, the one whom I banked all the odds on being with and the one I thought certain to succeed but the one relationship that capitulated so spectacularly before me, was also one of only a few star signs deemed to be totally incompatible with mine. Not only that but I also keyed in my parents star signs, and my sisters and brother in laws. All came back with perfect descriptions of the things they share in common and the things most often fought about, and I should know those as well as anyone, they are my family. Not just cherry picking or joining of dots, perfect descriptions. I find the idea to dismiss all of that as meaningless coincidence too much to bare. Sure, Astrology is as much a core belief as anything else is, and I cannot speak for others success with astrological descriptions/predictions, but I find it hard to believe so many would be taken in by something if it were pure unadulterated rubbish, and the accusation that it is appears to me to be baseless and unfounded. I have never followed weekly or monthly horoscopes closely enough to judge their accuracy, but they are two different topics that people often confuse. I am only talking about astrology and star signs broadly.
Time doesn't exist. Certainly not in the afterlife. There is no crossover. Time is a way we use to catalogue and structure our lives here. It has no use in eternal afterlife. Things can happen in an hour that takes days weeks or years here. I have many friends who are agnostic, atheist and religious. I love them all. I fight with my dying breath for their rights to all have their own core beliefs and not be judged for that. However I must say, lately more and more I found myself levitated toward the agnostics and religious. In my opinion many atheists are often the definition of what they accuse creationists of. I would prefer a Mormon or Jehovah’s witness knocking on my door to an Atheist. Though the latter probably never would. I find the atheists to often be more close minded than the religious. Their identities are both a manufactured product in my opinion. But at least all or most of the spiritual aspects I have covered here, creationists don't deny them, they may have different conclusions, but they don't deny the existence of the phenomena (or even the POSSIBLE existence) or tell me or others that their independent experiences are wrong. Judgment and anger are something we will never totally rid ourselves of, but they are by far and away our greatest enemy in life. There has been more than enough judgment from me in this piece alone.
One thing humorously enough that I'm sure all three will agree on, is that no human being is perfect. Never was, never will be. And just for the record, that doesn't happen by chance either.
By James Sloan
No planes at the World Trade Center, why the movement will always hide this fact at all costs
Whilst the idea of no planes at the World Trade Center was floated as early as 2001 by Nico Haupt and others, the hypothesis wasn't taken "seriously" until around late 2004, 2005 and early 2006. Right around a year before September Clues was released. Of course, there had been many challenges to the very official idea that passenger jets collided with the World Trade Centre, usually taking the form of Plane Switch theories, Pods and Flashes, the idea the planes were real but Modified fuel tankers and suchlike. With hindsight, it is very easy to lump all these
theories together, but out of respect, they were due diligently researched at the time by many dedicated researchers, and infact almost all had their own followers, they weren't all postulated by the same groups of researchers. The Pod theory came from Lets Roll Forums for example,
and was in regards to the second impact. In Plane Site, released in 2004, borrowed heavily from LRF research, however went one step further and suggested Flight 11 also had a Pod, but this was debated at LRF. Many sub sets believed things ranging from a Missile hitting the North Tower,
a modified DC 10, and other ideas. It must be born in mind it was much easier to suggest that a plane didn't hit the North Tower at the time, because as only one clear video of that event existed, and the plane was hardly very clear in the shot, the postulators were hardly suggesting media fakery was involved, so long as of course they suggested a missile impact or some other technology. Something physical of course. This has always been the LRF angle. Something physical as oppose to video manipulation. Of course, much good research had been done there and in other places about the idea the Naudet film was a set up, and of course watching what could only be described as a perfect swing of the camera by Jules Naudet, as well as many other perfect zoom in and zoom outs on all crash shots, and tower demolition shots, it was always presumed the cameramen or women had foreknowledge of what was about to happen. However, the idea the images were real was never challenged. That is what has been, and as I will go into further detail, what will always be, protected, at all costs. You can believe the Naudet story was a scam, you can believe there were 300 or more camera men or women out in the street who all captured the event perfectly and knew what was going to happen. As long as you didn't challenge the validity of the
footage that was fine. That is as far as it was ever taken on LRF, probably the most liberal truth forum up until that point. As long as there was a camera person in the street who filmed what happened, it really did not matter if you suggested it was a passenger jet, an orb, a blimp, a hot air
balloon, or even a baseball. Just as long as the film was authentic. Protect the media at all costs.
Whilst it is very hard to argue anyone in 2012 who believes any planes were used at all is a serious top flight researcher, this was not always the case. Many people (myself included) were at the most 50-50 on the issue for a very long time, because we never knew any better, and there were so many rabbit trails to go down. It must be said though, people were not totally ignorant of all the issues with "planes". People understood the physics of the crashes were in the very least suspicious, the idea an aluminum plane could penetrate the aluminum cladding, steel curtain wall,
thick safety glass, and with a wingspan of at least 7 floors, many layers of 4 inch thick concrete, steel decking, webs of trusses, and office furniture, going all the way from one side of the tower to the other, AND THEN, the engines having enough energy to penetrate through the safety glass, steel curtain wall and aluminum cladding (all without leaving a hole in the other side of the tower), well, the idea was far fetched in the least. So enter the Pod theory, where a bulge on the underside of the craft fired a missile at or just before impact, which I guess cleared the path for the plane. Quite bizarre in itself really given the videos showed none of this, except a small flash at impact. But this idea was taken seriously by many. LRF even went as far as to produce merchandise including but not limited to t-shirts to promote this theory. This idea was also sometimes coupled with other ideas, such as the plane was packed to the brim with explosives, and or the impact floors of the building were blown out with their own explosives, at or just prior to impact.
The last two ideas are actually more plausible than the Pod idea itself, in theory anyway. But once again, all photos and videos were authentic.
Enter early 2006. A new influx of "researchers" started appearing on 9/11 forums, promoting a new idea, that (at least) the second impact was fraudulent, no
plane hit WTC 2. It was either a missile, or a bomb, or nothing. Subsequently, for the first time, the images were being challenged. Many of these posters were
probably legit and clung on to the new refreshing idea, but many were also obvious plants designed to stir up emotions and essentially ruin the idea. LRF was notorious for banning this research or limiting it, the Admin Phil Jayhan banning MANY posters for promoting the idea no plane hit WTC 2. This was in obvious conflict with their precious Pod theory, and he was having none of it. The research was eventually allowed, however often relegated to sub sections of forums such as "No plane, No brain" sections, mocking the idea and making it clear it was a fringe theory, not to be discussed seriously.Laughable really given Jayhan himself is now a No Planer, his previous Pod theory now totally incompatible with his new empty towers stance. If Jayhan had even a modicum of respectability in the glory years of LRF, it is not totally gone. Which is ironic and deliberate given his latest stance is as close to the truth as his website has ever been in the past. His website is almost dead now with very few new threads. During my tenure there I witnessed a great many legitimate posters be banned and harassed for posting no plane research, even at the point wherehe agreed with them in theory. It was pathetic to watch and I no longer wanted any part of it.
So of course, by the time September Clues came out in 2007, the idea was already viewed as hogwash by many. Every 9/11 guy out there told you not to look at
it, Alex Jones made a comparison to Mental Illness, and guys like Ace Baker, Nico Haupt and others deliberately made themselves look crazy whilst promoting
the "fringe idea". A real shame too that Clues was not narrated, and had an amateurish feel to it, as previously slick productions like Loose Change Second Edition trumped it in many peoples eyes. So much of the 9/11 audience simply refuse to take the idea seriously, but as I will layout, there is more motivation to protect this idea than EVEN the idea the official story is untrue. Even websites like WTC7.net started putting disclaimers on their site as early as 2007 saying "we do not promote no jetliner theories, or incivility." Molding the two together, assuming no planers are there to start trouble and infighting, as many of the plant posters in 2006 did. They ruined the idea before it got to the mainstream. But on with the show;
For starters, no plane insults are asinine. Most 9/11 truthers have always been no planers for 2 out of 4 of the crashes that day. Including all on LRF, who practically invented the no plane no brain chant. Though there are some figureheads such as Jim Hoffman, Steven Jones etc who have not challenged the idea that four civilian planes crashed on 9/11, the vast bulk of the truth movement do not believe that Flights 11, 77, 175 and 93 took off that day and crashed
where stated. So it's okay to be a no planer, as long as its for 2/4 of the events? Right. So I guess the only difference between flight 77 and 175 and 11 is that it was shown on film. After All, there are witnesses to all four crashes, so how is it witnesses in Shanksville and Washington can be discounted, but witnesses in NYC must be taken at face value, despite all reporting vastly different types of aircraft. So I guess the only thing left is the films, which have demonstrably proven as fake. From the fact that commercial jets cannot do 550mph at sea level, to the fact no black boxes were found, to the fact that the videos are all fake and show vastly different trajectories, to the fact a jet engine cannot fly 500 meters and land on a street corner with no witnesses,
to countless other facts, the evidence is clear that no planes crashed in NYC. If you cannot see that, the scope of this blog is beyond you. I am not here to insult you, but direct you to other research on The Real News Online and other sites. The scope of this blog is to demonstrate WHY the movement will always protect the idea.
The idea they would use any real planes it outrageous. They have to be in control of every variable, and the only way to ensure that is to fake the videos. Nothing can go wrong. They have total control of the stage. There is no proof of any planes. For the first time in aviation history, black boxes are missing, four of them. A continuous looping tape on flight 93 managed to lose the last 3 minutes of its audio, this is impossible. Don't people think that if planes
really took off that day they would just release the security tapes of people boarding the flights? Nothing to lose. The news footage shows a 50-60 story fireball, a 50 story orange fireball. The soot part even higher. This is outrageous. The orange flame part of a fireball from a 767 crash would never be much higher than 3 or 4 stories at the most. Many videos of 767's crashing exist. The schematics of the crash are totally wrong. That is like a jet crashing into the street and the
fireball going higher than the tallest skyscrapers. Never would happen. The plane hits floor 78 and the orange part of the fireball goes at least 10 stories beyond the roof line, the soot even higher before it molds into the existing smoke. This is laughable to believe that could ever happen, much less with 10,000 gallons of jet fuel.
The reason that the movement protect this idea is two-fold. Firstly, they have to have the figure of 3000 people dying. Once you know that over 250 people did not die in plane crashes, you do tend to question the final death toll more, however the alleged flights 77 and 93 were sparsely occupied, so the finality of the toll would not be affected much.
The second is that once you take the planes out of the equation, many parts of the rest of the story start to crumble. Firstly, how can the news footage of the towers burning for an hour be true if no plane hit the tower? What is creating and sustaining those fires? How could you then have people up there starting fires if the building was fully occupied? And how would they get out? If no plane it the tower, why are all those people jumping out? Even if they blew a hole in the side of the tower, this wouldn't start a massive fire or make people jump out. How would they get a perfect sized gash in the tower? If people were up there starting fires, how can the jumpers be real? How did the fires become black just like jet fuel would? Who would put themselves in that
kind of danger to light those fires? If no plane hit, then why would people be trapped at all? It's not like all that plane debris would be blocking the stair cases. If the tower is full, you can't have any of this. There would be so many witnesses to these phantom guys starting fires in the building. Jayhan tries to explain this with his "smoke machines", but you can't have smoke without fire Phil, so what is causing the fires?
Jim Fetzer and others have tried to explain no planes with a hologram theory, but again this doesn't advance the idea much nor explain any of the above pitfalls.
Fetzer has even advanced the idea a cloaked plane 1400 feet to the right projected this hologram over NYC and into the building. The schematics of the hologram theory are outside the scope of this blog, but needless to say, it still preserves the idea of a full occupied building. How did the 25,000 people in the tower or the thousands on the street (assuming that is the case which it wasn't), not see this plane offshore? What a ridiculous risk to go to when you can just fake the videos. Fetzer promotes Richard Halls 9/11 study, however after much review and critique, I find it no more scientific than the NIST report, he draws line of data that don't even exist, much like NIST don't focus on the events after "initiation of collapse" and assume everything is automatic.Real scientists assume NOTHING and I am truly surprised a scholar like Fetzer would consider Halls study in any way scientific. Any theory as long as the buildings are full, the streets are full of witnesses, and the cameras are rolling and capturing the actual event, they don't care what advanced truthers believe. Grilled Cheese Sandwich hit the WTC? No problem, as long as they keep the media complicity out of it. Jim Fetzer was quoted on Dose of Reality with Brian S
Staveley and Justin Cooke, when confronted about the absurd trajectory on the dive bomber shot and others, "Oh well, what they probably did was throw in a few tampered videos to confuse the situation". Well first off Jim, those videos were broadcast on CBS on the DAY of 9/11. Secondly, once you admit even one of the network shots might not be legit, you call into question the entire Richard Hall study, which is based solely off network and home videos.
The hologram theory still has all the same pitfalls listed earlier. How do you get the fires? How do you get the Jet Engine and landing gear in the street? Must have been
planted, and if so, how did they do that with thousands of people on the street? If you are forced to admit those shots are doctored too it further damages the hologram theory. The hologram theory is designed once again to keep the media out of it, to protect the idea of empty towers and floors not being complete. What of the jumpers? If they are not inhaling the toxic fumes of jet fuel than why on earth are they jumping? And obviously, if you continue to deny the media
fakery than you must also account for jumpers being 50 feet out from the towers, Photoshop and so on. Good luck denying all the irrefutable evidence posted on these Photoshops at The Real News Online, Clues forum and LRF about this subject. LRF has excellent research about fake jumpers, they just reach sometimes different conclusions about how that effect was achieved, though recently they seem to have backed away from the dummies out the windows theory, to their credit. Lets Roll Forums has arguably one of the most vast and proficient research teams ever seen in the movement, it's just a shame their admin and several of their mods clearly
possess an agenda to hide the final 25% of the truth being exposed at Cluesforum, The Real News Online and other outlets, as well as attack vehemently those who attempt to preach this to the public, like Brian S Staveley and Simon Shack.
The only explanation for all of the above is media fakery. It is the only way for the perps to be in total control. It is provable beyond all shadow of a doubt to those who will only look. The idea they would use real planes is too risky. Also hologram technology is largely untested, and what of the risks of the image at that height reflecting off other buildings, or shadowing in as it hit the tower and reflecting off the glass of the building. The extreme risk of the shaped charges not creating the correct looking holes in the towers, the key to remember is they only had one shot at all of this. The towers do not look even remotely real in any of the moving video. The correct look was glassy and silvery, with a tinge of black. Below are two excellent scenes shot in 1991, starting at 6.47 that show the correct look of the towers.
Compare this to the washed out, cardboard box looking, windowless boxes in the 9/11 footage and the result is stark.
Regular cameras in 1991 show the correct look, and yet in 2001 this is the best they can manage. Notice the definition of windows in the foreground buildings and the lack thereof in the WTC. It is worth noting that around 1996 they changed the Friends intro for example, and many movies and TV shows stopped showing the correct WTC coloring, a definite and disgraceful attempt at pre programming.
Hopefully over the course of the last two years it has become very obvious why the 9/11 figureheads avoid no planes at the WTC at all costs. And a few who don't ignore it such as Phil Jayhan and Jim Fetzer, attempt to do all they can to muddy the waters and promote outrageous sub theories to distract the dedicated minority who see through the bullshit of Alex Jones, Dylan Avery and the big players in 9/11 truth. They do so because the agenda number one has
always been to protect the media. Though I am sure their preference is you believe the official story, they really could care less if you think Martians from planet Zhog attacked the WTC on 9/11. Just as long as you are unaware that the MEDIA attacked the WTC on 9/11. Now, just to clarify, obviously anyone who believes that 9/11 was an inside job, does not trust the media per say. They know (hopefully) they are controlled, a propaganda machine, and they lie and deceive the public. However they still assume that as current affairs people are journalists, they will at least provide us with coverage of events, and that their news footage and videos can more or less be trusted. If they cover a war, terrorist attack or court case, whilst knowing that the motives and perps behind those events are probably not as we are told, the COVERAGE of the event is truthful and the images are real. It is this, and only this, at the bottom line, that the powers that be wish more than anything else to protect from the world.
It is the WORLD media. It is far too easy to blame the 9/11 attacks on the "American Government". It is also grossly unfair on the American public. The same forces that control things behind the scenes control all our countries spare 4 or 5 in the world. No one is safe from their oppression and nobody is safe from their persecution. We at The Real News Online.Com have contributors from all over the planet and it would be naive of any of us to think we are any safer than each other from their persecution and their torment. They want you to think it's the US Government doing these things. That changes every four or 8 years. By the time their "crimes" are fully exposed that regime is often out and a new one is in. Maybe even the next one after that., but the media never really changes, nor the people behind the
scenes pulling the strings, carrying out these hoaxes.
Suppression of the no plane evidence definitely serves to carry out this agenda. By keeping the focus off the media, and on god knows who. We have had many callers into our radio show over the last year, all trying to argue planes hit the WTC, Pentagon etc. They always end up in the same rhetoric "We need to get Bush, Cheney and their masters, those homosexual bastards" and on and on it goes, and on and on it goes. Those guys will all be dead before too long, then what? You will have nothing more to say, and the next false flag hoax media attack will already be underway. And so the cycle repeats.
James Sloan - The Real News Online.Com
JUST ADDED NEW INFO TOO!!!!! NOW PHIL ENDORSES SEPTEMBER CLUES AFTER BANNING ME IN BIG PART FOR IT! If you saw this blog just scroll down to the big red letters JUST ADDED!!!
I was undecided on whether or not to ever write this blog. I was going to be the bigger man again, let shots be fired and actually not respond. Now Phil Jayhan has tried to tie my family to 9/11!! This has gone way too far. Many people out there wonder why Brian S Staveley is no longer a member of Let's Roll Forums. I was a moderator and it's top radio host. I built them their radio station from scratch which was no easy task seeing as I had to teach myself via Google and at one point I was on air on 5 days a week pushing the 9/11 messages expressed on the forum. I AM IP BANNED???!!! For the crimes off what? Too much truth?
Over the course of a very short time Phil made me a moderator(I will elaborate on the reason I believe why soon) After this I setup The Last American Broadcast for them. It was rather odd after building it and seeing so much interest from everyone especially Phil being excited about having a platform for their message, that no one did any shows. They would always thank me like it was a big deal, yet never come on the air. Mike Dammann made an honest effort. He tried daily shows which I also produced, edited, uploaded, etc. Eventually he faded away and it was just me. Everyone has to work and it understandable. I had little work at the time and spent five days a week promoting the whole 9/11 message from Let's Roll Forums. Some of it was incorrect, much of it was right.
Around December and January and probably later I asked Phil many times "Hey Phil wanna do a show" "We need to do a show soon together on 9/11"
He showed no interest. Maybe he was busy? I hear raccoon season is booming in those months :-)
Regardless I was a moderator of the board and a constant contributor. I never said I was a top researcher as Phil implies. When investigating a certain 9/11 family, I was on the ground not the internet, the ground paying for my gas and these official documents for the forum. Searching out archives buildings, town halls and much more. That along the fact with the amount I pushed the message via other mediums I would say that is someone who is a MAJOR contributor to the site. Just Google The Last American. I did hundreds of shows probably for them. Odd the name of the site is www.PhilJayhan.com. Oddd name for something that was supposed to become this 9/11 video and audio archive. Self Promotion? NO?
After a while it got old. I got suspicious of some of the activities at Let's Roll So I started doing shows just once a week on my own site which was already built. (The Site) www.TheRealNewsOnline.com
I made this move to not be so closely tied with anyone. Just be myself on my own network. A lot of people were wary of having me on due to being tied to PHil and that is a fact. I just wanted to do my own thing.
6 months ago now I started to realize that much if not all of the collapse footage we were shown on tv on 9/11 was faked. It was CGI. This is absolute. Maybe not 100% of the footage and I don't want to go to that extreme now but I'd say over 90% of what you saw was faked. So are all the photos. Well this is groundbreaking stuff. Surely Phil wants to know about it and he does. I spent 6 hours showing him clips after clip and he showed no interest in it at all even though it was rather convincing and he never started a thread!!!! Remind you this is a site with probably over 100k threads. About all types of stuff and no CGI collapse thread???? I wanted to learn how deep it went. At the time I didn't know it was so much of it.
Then I found more evidence of Computer Generated Imagery on 9/11 From ANOTHER source. I tried to show Phil and he flipped on me saying "This isn't gonna be a fucking shrine to Simon Shack" I said Phil those videos aren't from Simon at all. "Well it looks like parts of his movie" I said well they are not from September Clues at all!! He went on and on about Simon and so I said"Have you even seen September Clues?" He said NO!!! Not the whole thing. LOL That's funny! You got this guy in deep in the movement all this time and he hasn't seen the movie he's so quick to shoot down. That's a blatant lie or a serious ego problem. We will go with the blatant lie.
Needless to say to there was no CGI thread started. He never mentioned it in chat.
For the record Phil and I had become "friends" He would call constantly on Skype and many many times on my cell. We would talk 9/11 for days. sometimes 6 hrs at a a time. For a while I thought it was great. Then after all these newer developments, with all these going down I became suspicious. Anyhow I continued my investigating over there. I would read almost every 9/11 related thread on both Let's Roll and September Clues. I have no bias. I just want the F'n Truth!!
It's well known that Phil and Simon Shack have a huge feud going. That's not my problem. If I can land an interview with the guy that made the one legit in my eyes documentary of 9/11 I'm gonna get him on. Not on Phil's site but on mine. I'll have whoever I want on. The interview with Simon went very well at the time but I know it set Phil off a little.
A pilot from the town next to me allegedly was killed on 9/11 so it's hard enough for me to tell this story around here but I am relentless. Phil calls again this time at like 3am " I wanted to get you before I was drunk. LEts make this quick and we will finish tomorrow. "How many people live in Dracut MA Brian?" I said IDK about 30,000 Phil. He told me I was wrong and theres only 300 houses and 1055 residents in Dracut!! 'I have been studying satelite imagery all night and your lying. I said"Phil I could name 15 streets off the top of my head with more than 300 houses. Your way off. Then I said Phil I could go to the High School and find 1055 Students tomorrow. He then said all the kids were fake residents shipped in from all the surrounding communities which he tried to name off and at this point it was laughable. I let him go and said call me tomorrow. So now it's "Hollow Dracut"? LOL.
I still maintained a friendship with Phil til he called me on the phone a week or so later. Mind you this is just a guy I know from the internet. He called at like 2am! On my cell. Not that out of the norm but never the less if I don't want answer, I don't have to. This went on for 3 nights. I have NO INTEREST IN HIS NEW THEORY!! I along with anyone I know would instantly disregard anything I've said on 9/11. It felt like it was to discredit me. So I i didn't want to talk about "Hollow Dracut" anymore. Its absurd and it's basically calling me either an idiot or a liar! This is the town next to me. There are 30,000 people there. I go there everyday. See tons of traffic and people. It's a bustling town. I am not obligated to answer the phone for Phil. At all hours of the night. I ignored him for three days yes. Big Deal!
How did he respond?? He attacked me on his forum where I had earned many people's respect. As a matter of fact he attacked me relentlessly for almost a week!!! EVERY NIGHT IN CHAT. pages upon pages just trashing me, calling me an asshole, saying I've never done anything for LRF, never plugged them, I'm a dickhead, yadda yadda yadda.
Guess what I did? Nothing I let it go til the emails came. There 4 in a row of him cussing me out, sending me info on Simon Shack like we are buddies now or something and says I see how you attack me, you have your guests do it. There was other emails where he asked if we were enemies now!!! I remind you this is still with no response from me. Last contact was the Dracut call. All I have done to him is not returned his calls for 3 days. Big deal. I do it to my own friends. Real life friends.
The next email he asked if I wanted WARFARE with him. Phil if that's the type of confrontation you want fine but this is to distract me and I won't let it. I will continue to get closer to the truth of 9/11 no matter which gatekeepers I need to hurdle.
So now we are on 5-6 nights of total trashing of me and my character (a respected mod at the Lets Roll Forum) all in the chat for any member to read. Not even in his weak ass team chat. So what did I do. I let it go one more day. Me and Justin were doing a moon hoax show and I needed to prepare a lot. It was not about waitng to reply as much as putting the important things first. Well
then Emails Justin to talk sh%$ about us not sticking up for him against Simon Shack. Which wasn't even a huge insult so we let it die. He made an email about Simon to send to me though. Bad mouthing him, mysteriously after I was IP banned from LRF He and Simon are now buddies. So which one is it Phil ? You gonna ban his research or go visit Rome?? Then After being a gracious host to Simon the people on his forum (not all of em there are some great ones) trash me for a week, calling me a shill. Odd timing to say the least. It should be noted that an over 5 year member and serious contributor to their other radio shows James Sloan was also banned and my co host Justin Cooke was demoted! All over this and more bickering Phil intentionally started to weed out the good people.
Saturday night I think it was he actually emailed me and said
Phil Jayhan Apr 24to me So, not sure what you want to do here. I have a radio show scheduled for Friday night. Are you willing to give me the log in information and send me the software link so I can figure out how to use it before Friday night?
If so, please let me know ASAP. This is one of the most important witnesses of 9/11 to ever come forward IMO and just because we aren't friends anymore, don;t think it should fall through the cracks.
So can you please let me know ASAP if your willing to help me or not, so I can rest, knowing I can do the show?
If your not going to help, all I am asking is an email reply back right away telling me so, so I am not left hanging and dangling. Can you at least send me an email letting me know?
After this week long barrage of insults and discredting I had the heart cause I love 911 truth so much I SAID YES!!!!!!!!!!!! After being called an asshole, cocksucker and all this in his chat for a week.
Brian Staveley Apr 25to Phil I will show you how to set it all up
Phil Jayhan Apr 25to me Cool, thanks a lot Brian, I appreciate it. It's going to be a great interview. He saw it, the hollow with which we speak. He saw whats on the other side of this picture. Let me know how you want to do this and let me know.
I have one more reply then look what I wake up to in the chat!
Brian Staveley Apr 25to Phil Female over tonight. we will talk tomorrow sometime.
So after a barrage of insults and you will see some. Threatening emails and everything else I AGREED TO HELP HIM BROADCAST HIS BULLLSH%^ SHOW WITH THE WITNESS TO THE HOLLOW TOWERS HE SAYS!!!. I agreed out of my heart. Now look at the chat overnight. That very night. Notice the date. Its one day later than our emails where I said yes. After being called a shill, an assh$#e and a cock^&cker by Phil! He tells his people I won't help and the radio show can't go on!! LOL. This is just minutes and hours after I said I'd help!.
NON STOP CUSSING OUT OF MOSTLY ME AND SOME OF SIMON SHACK! Rather odd when you see what I added about his new support and endorsement of September Clues Just Days After Banning Me!
Click to Zoom . Start reading From The Bottom. This Is What He Says In The Public Cause They Don't Know I Said Yes. Big Scumbag Move!!!! This was going on for a week mind you. Me accepting to help you think would end it!
Hold CNTRL and Hit + to Enlarge Photos So You Can Read The Attacks!
I put it off one more day til after my radio show. I needed to focus on that so I let it all pass just one more day.
The night of the Moon Hoax Show Phil Jayhan an alleged friend goes on our comment wall and writes"Nice Promotion of Alex Jons" LMAO! Anyone who has heard 5 minutes of us know we hate Jones, what he stands for and his misleading of everyone.We explain to anyone who brings him up and we go through his whole agenda!!! Phil knows this. We have done countless shows on it! Just like you've never seen September Clues right Phil? He really told me that when he flipped on me on those videos, just months ago.
The next day I responded. So it must have been the Monday after the moon show, I'll look it up. I made a post on the forum. I am now IP BANNED FROM LET'S ROLL FORUMS!!! ME!! MODERATOR, builder of the radio station and premiere host, just BANNED. I outgrew the gatekeeping Phil knows it, I know it and other know it!If you wish to read the post it was written by me and titled something like "In Defense of myself I needed to write this"
I pretty much wrote everything that was in this email in a forum post. His crazy ass then said the following. "Now Brian is bringing this into the public" REALLY???? He's been ranting in front of any member about me for days in the chat and I will show you examples. Calling me names where if you tried it here in Lowell Phil, you'd have some serious issues. That's bringing it the public! Anything I said was on the phone or in email not of the forum, a very busy forum where a lot of researchers respected me well. You trash me and Justin on our comment wall DURING OUR LIVE SHOW. You brought it all in the public on BOTH OF OUR SITES!!!!!! Thousands saw that ah#@! So what does he do next he tells ppl I published personal phone calls we had!!! That's a strong accusation and a false one!!! His defintion of that- me quoting him from what he said to me about all this Dracut nonsense. Saying BRIAN STAVELEY PUBLISHES PERSONAL CALLS IS A STRONG LIE!!! But that's what Phil is about. Lies, Ego and gatekeeping. Have you started that CGI evidence thread yet Phil. Now after attacking me for having him on you and Simon your buddies right after I'm attacked on his forum. Very odd timing to say the least.
You were a rude son of a bitch that acted like a crazed ex girlfriend because I didn't answer the phone and it was all planned. I knew It was coming. I called it to the day. People knew you were gonna attack me. You needed to get rid of a few us us, admit it. We weren't under the Jayhan mind spell anymore. What type of friend just cause they can't get in contact for days goes on the internet and trashes a friends and fellow moderator/researcher for a week on both our sites. Without a back and forth! That is the act of a snake. He said I never did anything for Lets Roll. Anyone want the archives with hundreds of hours of audio I did on The Last American for Phil.
Any HONEST people left there there you know I was for real and I welcome you all to come listen to our shows and read our blogs here at www.TheRealNewsOnline.com. Soon I will have a much better forum also. If anyone can help with that, let us know.I think we all know who the the real truth teller is here.
You tell a lot of it but mix in so much bullshit and confusion your no more than another 9/11 gatekeeper.You should get that ego checked too.You went on for weeks now and still are. This response is warranted as many , many people email me asking why you attacked me. People are very wary of you Phil not me. Keep my name out your mouth and keep hiding the whole truth for the government and media. It won't stop from finding out more and more about this Hollywood style fraud hoax.
JUST ADDEDBTW now after this banning me off let's roll and all this suspicious activity look at the thread Phil put up!!!! So was I right the whole time?? I can not believe he is now praising Simon weeks after IP BANNING me, sounds like gatekeepping whatever I might say on it!original URL to LRF posthttp://letsrollforums.com/september-clues-must-see-t28086.html?s=99948766b8bb5c137b6b29d47a16364fI had to hide my IP to get on since I'm so evil!!! Here is copy and paste in case the link don't work.But it should now I altered it.
I can't post the direct link so to Let's Roll Forums
Let's Roll Forums
> The U.S. Government Conspiracy of 9/11
> 911 For the Tired, Weary, Hustled Masses September Clues - A Must See Movie for Every Person
First post by Phil!
Join Date: 23 Feb 2004Location: Middle EarthPosts: 22,830Threads: 2785Blog Entries: 28
Thanked 7,938 Times in 2,914 PostsThis is actually from Phil Jayhan
weeks after accusing me on having Simon Shack on so I could attack Phil via my guests. (Since that what I tend to do when I don't answer my phone. lol )
I want to thank Simon Shack for his time and dedication in making this most astounding 9/11 video. It is a compilation of his own research and his forum members, and other 9/11 Illuminaries who saw the hoax of 9/11 long before I, and long before most.
For all of the people, in all of the world, who took millions of hours of their own time researching 911, this single video will bring you to the very edge of the 9/11 mysteries, and leave only a few questions unanswered.
The first video of September Clues, was made in 2006.
If a tree falls in the Forest, and there isn't a qualified 9/11 researcher or ass crawler to hear it, is it still wrong? And is it still a tree?
I want to thank Simon and the Clues gang for bringing this video and making it, years ahead of it's time. (their colors are brown and yellow)
Long before I was willing to open my mind to such an "outrageous conspiracy theory."
Now that most of the emotional impact and drama of 9/11 have vanished, I would ask every person on the internet to please watch September Clues.
It will answer nearly every single question people have had about 911 since day 1. And was created in 2005-2006.
HE EVEN POSTS THE MOVIE!! HE PUT IT IN TWO CLIPS
Isn't this a bit odd. First I am attacked for basically having Simon on. Phil goes on a tirade about me for a week. Sends me Stuff about Simon talking mad shit. Read the chats above. There is a lot about me and Simon. Now I'm IP banned off LRF(for trying to explain this stuff to Phil in part) and these guys are best friends now????? Then figuring I helped promote September Clues Forum and their information so much, let Simon says whatever he wanted on our show and then I'm attacked on September Clues for two weeks. Something isn't adding up here. So know after outing me for showing him CGI collapse footage, not buying his wacky theory he is down with it all and actually kissing Simon's ass???!!!!!! HAHAHAAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHARead the chats above from just days before. I'm the one they should be wary off?? HahahaahaMake sure you read some comments. A lot of members are seriously doubting his intentions just as I knew was coming!! Read the thread after Phil's ass kissing post of Simon!Come join some real truthers. We are working on a better forum and could use help and we do a radio show once a week. Here is the link.
For the record I do and ALWAYS have supported the research of September Clues, However it's been taboo on LRF til Now. Very odd timing wouldn't you say??? If you haven't seen it, please watch it. I have ALWAYS SUPPORTED IT!
Then just about a week after Phil's attacks on me and maybe 3 weeks after having Simon Shack on as a guest I was bombarded by people on his forum and labeled a gatekeeper and everything! This is AFTER I let them air their complete message on my air waves with little to no resistance to Simon's Theories. Don't Believe it the crap I had to put up with and this is after never twisting a word of theirs and honestly promoting them online on Facebook and other mediums as much as anyone. I am getting very close to the truth and I know I am trying to be discredited. The Hollow Dracut thing, The weeks of attacks on both sites. You call all read a few chats above and see how I was treated. It was no different on Clues. AFTER I gave then a great show, Justin as well and of course Simon. Very informational and I believe at least 90% or higher factual. Phil even told people I was a 9/11 agent! All without even speaking to me for just a few days.Anyways start on this thread where I am relentlessly attacked on www.Cluesforum.info. You really gotta see how unwarranted it was and again this is AFTER Simon himself liked the show yet still compared me to all these gatekeepers. Others were quite rude. Most members are very cool. As a matter of fact i'd say we have ten listeners from clues. Even several posted our link, It didn't stop the attacks though. Look how I was treated after giving them a great radio show
. First here is the show. It is a must listen. I am NOT saying Simon's information is wrong. I think he has it close to nailed but the timing of all this is too odd. Now Phil supports Simon after cussing me out weeks before?? Then I'm banned on one and attacked on both biggest 9/11 forums.Listen to this as you read the hit pieces on me. They have stopped. Thank god.
This is our show with Simon Shack. We gave him free reign and hardly opposed any of his theories as I do believe 90% or more of it. I've seen so much of the evidence with my own eyes. His site is great. Please check it out but the forum can be very discouraging! It has turned many off of the media fakery research!Simon Shack, Brian S Staveley and Justin Cooke.
I post on page 8 of this thread. Attacks on me start on page 10! http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=167&
My first post I believe was in page 8 on this thread on the clues forum. Just trying to be friendly. There was one or two positive posts by real members who have heard me on the air then the attacks came. Page 10 -16 the attacks on me are relentless and uncalled for. I tried so hard to call for peace. Hopefully we have it. It seems many seem to try to drive the good ones away, again. Yet there is more being hidden. Media fakery is the key to this event but there is more to it and they won't stop me and the other honest researchers I collaborate with from finding it. I hope you all take this very seriously. If you'd have similar experiences please comment below!!! Thank you to the honest researchers and members that do remain on both sites. I have received many emails and inboxes surrounding this and incredible support. I think we all know who the 9/11 agent is and it's not Brian S Staveley.www.TheRealNewsOnline.com
Either Audio Will Play The NASA Moon Hoax Radio Show. The Top Of The Two Is Recommended. It seems to be more stable and if you lose your spot it's easier to find it. They are identical other than the format they are in. Press play then proceed. Much of this evidence will be discussed.
|File Size: ||86869 kb|
|File Type: || mp3|
This blog is setup to follow along with our Moon Hoax Radio Special from Sunday April 22-12. There won't be a huge amount of text to read as we want you to follow along with our speaking during the show however like some of our other interactive blogs(9/11). I am going to post about four very important documentaries you need to see. The first are both short like 45 min and TOTALLY EXPOSE THESE GUYS WEREN'T ON THE MOON. The second is a follow up to the great exposed evidence in the first. You will see the astronauts so infuriated they are caught they actually punch the reporters in the face!!!
I do not expect you to just believe us on a few pics or videos but these things I am putting forth next are very thorough analysis of all the images whether video or pictures. This is child's play really. Those two docs are called Dark Mission One, Two and Three. They are a little dry but will totally debunk all the NASA moon imagery. You will see WIRES picking astronauts up! Once you see that, what do you say next???
We should note people in my era athletes and celebrities alike do thousands of interviews. How many has a man like Michael Jordan given? You would think the first man to walk on the moon would still be booked with appearances, no??? He REFUSES TO GIVE A SINGLE INTERVIEW SAYING HE WALKED ON THE MOON!!
Does that make sense to you???
Here are some ridiculous images for us to quickly look at. For much more view the documentaries provided.
Where are the stars??? The reason they didn't bother faking them I think would be all the issues ppl could bring up with the shots not matching up so they simply ignored it!! REMEMBER THE MOON HAS NO ATMOSPHERE!! It's always a clear night!! No clouds!!! Should be stars EVERYWHERE!! It's a joke!!!!
No secondary lighting?? REALLY!!! How can these two men have such different shadows from only the natural light?
Look Ma!! No Stars!!! The LUNAR SURFACE OR A HOLLYWOOD STUDIO???
The Illuminated One!
Lunar Lander No Dust Kicked UP. Legs Constructed Of...... What Is That??? AGAIN NO STARS!! AS ALWAYS!! :-)
Here is a close up!!!! What is this constructed with??? Is that black construction paper and aluminum foil?? It went to the moon?? Laughable!
Watch these in order. I am making this easy for you!!! Also attached a few articles at the bottom. Pay very close attention to this first movie and its only like 45 minutes! CAUGHT RED HANDED STAGING FIRST APOLLO MISSION!!!!
During The Show We Will Be Playing A Clip Starting At 32:05
Please Forward If Watching Along. Please When You Can WATCH THE WHOLE THING!!!!
Youtube has just scrubbed two of the movie I needed to show you from existence! A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon, and Astronauts Gone Wild. I HAVE Redownloaded Them And Just Need To Split Them ?Into Parts To Reload. They Will Be Back Soon. I do Have The Most Important Clip From Astronauts Gone Wild For Now Until My Work Is Done. It'll Be All Back Up By The End of The Week(You could just download a Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon Yourself If You Know What I Mean. TPB) However a great clip and a few other great movies are below still!
Now Watch Their Insane Reactions When Questioned On Their Moon Hoax!! The Apollo Astronauts ASSAULT the reporter SEVERAL TIMES!! Watch This Second, It Will Make More Sense As The First Movie IS Addressed Many Times & VITAL For This To Make SENSE!!!!
And now for the serious ones. Still have any doubts??? You should! Let's Always Be Thorough. Analysis of all the fake moon imagery here!!! This can be rather dry but it a huge analysis of impossible imagery!!
EVEN MORE HOURS OF MORE DOCTORED PHOTOS, FAKE SCENERY ETC... Watch All These And You Will Have Seen So Much.
Good Points For Easing People Into It With This One. I Don't Like Their Labels "conspiracy theorists" but it shows good points.
Usually we save these for blog posts but seeing as it shares all over the web its a good way to inform you all of tonight's show. Jsst visit us here at 1030pm eastern time Dose Of Reality Radio w Brian And Justin . Usually we do Sunday night's at that time but we got cut a lil short last night. Simply visit this siste or here is the direct link to our radio page!http://www.therealnewsonline.com/dose-of-reality-radio-show.htmlThank You!
I have written before about Dr. Ron Paul, and why he is no different than the average politician. However the difference between Ron, and the other remaining GOP candidates and current Puppet in Chief Barack Obama is that Dr. Paul has millions of fans and followers in the "Truth" and "Liberty" Movements. While I agree with most of his stances towards personal liberties, and his "non interventionist" policies, there is one glaring hole in his economic beliefs. He has made it well known that he's all for an economy based on gold and other commodities. In my research I have found this to be severely flawed, and in actuality believe that he needs to be called out on this, as very few people in the alternative media will touch on the dangers of a gold standard. The only "big names" that I have come across who have even mentioned any criticism of Paul and Austrian Economics are Webster Tarpley, Bill Still, and Henry Makow. I'm sure most of the people reading this have watched "The Money Masters" and "The Secret of Oz" by Bill Still. However most do not remember what was stated by Mr. Still., and wrongly believe that the only way to fix the economic situation we are in is to go to a gold standard, as they believe that gold and silver are equivalent to Rothschild/Jesuit kryptonite. This is far from the case.
"Beware of calls to return to a gold standard. Why? Simple. Because never before has so much gold been so concentrated outside of American hands. And never before has so much gold been in the hands of international governmental bodies such as the World Bank and International Monetary Fund. In fact, the IMF now holds more gold then any central bank.
The Swiss are under intense pressure from the Money Changers to dispose of their gold. This is most likely either a prelude to the complete demonetization of gold (like silver before it), or to its monopolization and re-monetization by the Money Changers. Therefore, to return to a gold standard would almost certainly be a false solution in our case. As was repeated in the Great Depression: "In gold we trusted; by gold we're busted."
Likewise, beware of any plans advanced for a regional or world currency - this is another international banker's Trojan Horse - a deception to open the national gates to more international control."
Money Masters video transcript; Bill Still
I believe the reasoning for the pro gold beliefs has something to do with a plan that has been in the works for at least 20 years. Many of us have read "The Secret of Jekyll Island" by G. Edward Griffin. Most people don't understand that it's a ripoff of Eustace Mullins' book "The Secrets of the Federal Reserve". The only major difference is that Mullins' solution was not gold, but is actually a system based on "social credit", whereas Griffin claims that gold is the answer. I believe the reason for Griffin to write that book was so that many people would read it as they are being introduced into "Libertarian" ideals, and would falsely believe that gold/silver is the only way to stop the oligarchs.
Read more of it in this link: http://realcurrencies.wordpress.com/2012/01/18/who-is-ed-griffin/
The beliefs in all of this goes back to Ludwig Von Mises and the Austrian School of Economics. However most people are not even aware of how Austrian Economics started and don't know that Mises was actually supported by the Rockefeller Foundation for a while when he came to the US. To me this is a huge red flag, and makes me wonder if the whole thing is not an inside job. There are many other ties to famous Austrian Economics believers like Mises, Griffin, Paul, and Murray Rothbard to the Koch funded John Birch Society, the Volker Fund and the Rockefeller Foundation. Check out this quote from Mises' biographer Richard M. Ebeling, and check out the links below it from writer Anthony Migchels.
“Many readers may be surprised to learn the extent to which the Graduate Institute and then Mises himself in the years immediately after he came to United States were kept afloat financially through generous grants from the Rockefeller Foundation. In fact, for the first years of Mises’s life in the United States, before his appointment as a visiting professor in the Graduate School of Business Administration at New York University (NYU) in 1945, he was almost totally dependent on annual research grants from the Rockefeller Foundation.” – Richard M. Ebeling, The Life and Works of Ludwig von Mises http://realcurrencies.wordpress.com/2012/02/17/how-the-money-power-created-libertarianism-and-austrian-economics/
I think the writer does well in identifying who is ok or not in the alternative media, but as always use your own discernment, I agree with him on David Icke, but I don't believe in any of Icke's reptilian theories: http://realcurrencies.wordpress.com/2012/02/12/hate-the-state-buy-gold-and-all-will-be-well-an-alternative-media-in-crisis/
Now, another point that I wanted to get to is Ron Paul's ties to PNAC member Louis Lehrman. Most of you know about PNAC, but have no idea about "the other" document by PNAC about the gold standard. Dr. Paul co-authored a book with Lehrman called "A Case For Gold". It makes you wonder why we haven't heard Alex Jones mention the other PNAC document. I believe the reasoning for that is Jones is completely controlled opposition. You can read of Jones' exploits on this site, but I'm not going to go too far in this blog, because we've already exposed AJ's cointelpro activities. The truth is that he is not the Patriotic American that many have been led to believe, but he's a snake oil salesman, and has a huge interest in gold as his assets are tied up in it heavily as are Dr. Paul's. Writer Keith Gardner does a great job of exposing this in the next link. http://libertyrevival.wordpress.com/2012/02/13/alex-jones-new-world-order-agenda/comment-page-1/#comment-6543
By now you are probably thinking that I'm a believer in Keynesian Economics or Marxism, but nothing can be further from the truth. I just see this coming, and see very few people exposing it in the alternative media. I was deeply bothered when I came across Dr. Paul's statement made on Congressional Record that proves that he has no problem with a single World currency: ie "A New World Order". Only the most dedicated Paulbot can make this next statement to be positive.
"There's nothing to fear from globalism, free trade and a single worldwide currency.... The effort in recent decades to unify government surveillance over all world trade and international financial transactions through the UN, IMF, World Bank, WTO, ICC, the OECD, and the Bank of International Settlements can never substitute for a peaceful world based on true free trade, freedom of movement, a single but sound market currency, and voluntary contracts with private property rights.... The ultimate solution will only come with the rejection of fiat money worldwide, and a restoration of commodity money. Commodity money if voluntarily and universally accepted could give us a single world currency requiring no money managers, no manipulators orchestrating a man-made business cycle with rampant price inflation."
Ron Paul, Congressional Record, 13 March 2001
The facts are that Dr. Paul will be the next President or VP, and most of you realize by now that the President is no more than a puppet. I have seen the mainstream media "warm up" to Paul, and I truly believe this is the next psycological operation, and the fact that so many "awake" people are falling for it drives me insane. I'm sure you realize that Presidents are selected and not elected, and yet choose to give so much of their time to a REPUBLICAN running for President amazes me. It seems that so many have traded their shepards from the MSM to the talking heads in the alternative media, and are not able to critically think, but just shout regurgitated statements like "End the FED", and talk about "fiat" money and "sound" money as if the only way to accomplish it is with Ron Paul and the gold standard. The truth is that we do need to rehaul our economy, but not the way so many people believe.
In fact Dennis Kucinich's Need Act of 2011 (Zarlenga Plan) is a better way to fix the economy. Keith Gardner of "Libert Revival" states that with that plan and a few suggestions, "The only thing I would suggest for the bill is to also eliminate taxation of wages in the income tax code and promote the land value tax and citizen dividend since that is equally important. Unfortunately, for the U.S., reforming the tax code will be difficult because taxes are on the federal, national, and state level, however The Zarlenga Plan does suggest a citizen dividend, paying off national debt, funding landed infrastructure, and public option health insurance, which i agree would all be good things to do while fractional reserve banking is ending. The great part of the Zarlenga Bill is that finance of deficit spending is done with printing rather than borrowing as a default course of action. Wealthy interests would limit spending if it devalues their wealth rather than allows them to collect interest."
Now I am not touting Kucininch as any type of hero either as believe that we have NOBODY left who is 100% legit in the Government as we observed him cave into Obama over the health plan, but I think this plan with Keith's suggestions would be a great start. Now there are a few things to consider before so many jump on the "gold" ship. Do you really think that the head of the World Bank, Alan Greenspan, and Louis Lehrman are thinking about us or the Country? They have all come out in support of the gold standard, and I believe that's a testament to how dangerous it really is.
Louis Lehrman http://www.thegoldstandardnow.org/key-blogs/671-america-will-return-to-the-gold-standard-within-five-years
World Bank head calls for Gold Standard http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/11/08/us-gold-zoellick-idUSTRE6A70D720101108
Alan Greenspan http://www.zerohedge.com/article/stunner-gold-standard-fully-supported-alan-greenspan
So, there you have it, my opinion is that Ron Paul is out for a free lunch, and is complete controlled opposition, and it's very easy to see that he has all of his assets tied up in gold as well. What about the rest of us? I think this has a lot to do with the Ayn Rand philosophy that the Corporation owners and elite don't need a responsibility to the rest of society.
Also, I should note that Ron Paul doesn't care about American workers as he is not for tariffs, he just wants "free trade" which is basically an illusion. He also voted to repeal the "Glass Steagall Act" which helps protect us from the oligarchies. To date I've never heard him mention anything about Tesla's free energy or anything else that will truly benefit us. He is for the same old coal, oil, and nuclear energies, and also balks at putting any regulations on them.
I think a big misconception is that we need to get rid of all of the alphabet agencies. That is a fallacy as the big corporations would have free reign to pollute or do what they want to do. I'm in favor of getting rid of the CIA, DHS, TSA, and a few others, but the FDA, the EPA, and the SEC need to be totally revamped with the FDA getting rid of all Monsanto, Big Pharma, and other ties that bind, the EPA needs rehauling as well, and the SEC needs to be purged of Goldman Sachs and other banking insiders who look out for there buddies every step of the way.
He also claims to be anti-war, but has never called out the false flag of 9/11, and I'm sure that he would take us to war if the Israelis happened to pull off another false flag attack and blame it on Iran or Syria, as he did vote for the Afghanistan invasion after 9/11, and also was one of the few who voted against condemming Israel for an attack on Iran's nuclear reactor in 1981 Either way, the President is virtually powerless, and I believe Obama ran on an anti-war campaign as well. Maybe the days of war are over (I doubt it), and the New World Order is ready for the next chapter.
Never the less, his financial policies are far from sound, and have people like Henry George, Eustace Mullins and Ezra Pound spinning in their graves. For more information check out Keith Gardner's "Liberty Revival" blog, and Anthony Migchels' "Realcurrencies" blog for more detailed information, and also check out Bill Still's blog, and his movies again, as well as reading Eustace Mullins' book about the Federal Reserve (Secrets of the Federal Reserve). http://libertyrevival.wordpress.com/ http://realcurrencies.wordpress.com/
I am writing this piece because too many people feel too secure when it comes to electronics like their computers. The situation is far from it. The Internet is full of bad people who want to make money any way possible. Some ways they do is is by putting malware on your computer and recording keystrokes, or by stealing your emails full of your information. Then there is crime from even higher. Crime as high a level as Google and Facebook. They install tracking pieces of information called cookies, that log all the websites you visit, and they compile some of that information and sell it to third parties advertisers who make advertisements relevant to you. Ever notice why some ads seem like they know what you want? They know who you are and what you like. Here are some of the ways to protect your information from third parties, and how to make your computer more secure.
The internet isn't like the days where you would see an email and know right away that it is a scam. Much like the Nigerian scam emails from the 90s and early 2000s. Did you know that it is not like anymore. Now, there are huge corporations paid to steal your information so they can make profits? Google is one of them. It isn't limited to what you do on the Internet. Now, there are programs that come with crap to install like those toolbars, and all they do is log information. Information gathering has come a long way since the 90s. We are in an age, where even the most trusted corporations are out to get your information.
• If you set up your own wireless connection, make sure you use WPA2 encryption instead of WEP because WEP is weaker than WPA
, and a really long password. It doesn't matter if it isn't an easy password to remember. You want to prevent people from accessing your router or network. So you could write it down on a piece of paper and hide it. You only really need to enter the password once, and your computer will remember the password by itself. That WPA2 encryption means that the data sent from your computer to the router has more encryption and is less easy to be read and hacked. Also set up a a strong password to access the router. If someone has hacked your wifi password, they can mess around on your router and do unwanted things on it. So make sure you set up a good strong password for the router as well.
• DO NOT USE OR SEND PRIVATE DATA ON PUBLIC NETWORKS!!! I will only say that once. Seriously. If you are going to access Facebook at Starbucks or something, you have to use some type of encryption. You can use an SSH tunnel
(requires skill to set up), a Virtual Private Network
, or even a SOCKS proxy
. Also when you are on a public wifi, make sure all the sites that use private data is using the HTTPS protocol
. You can look at the address bar and if it says https://website.com
, you are good. There are people who steal data from public wifis. There is a Firefox extension that can do this for you. It is called Firesheep
. It scans data sent over the wireless connection for cookies that hold password information to common websites. Websites like Facebook, Youtube, Myspace. etc. That means that the guy at Starbucks could steal your passwords and do unwanted things on your accounts. You should also never do banking or anything dealing with your money on public wifis. Not unless you have one of those forms of protection encrypting your connection to the bank(s).
• You can find out which VPN providers care about the anonymity of their users here
. Make sure you do research on a VPN that you decide to get. Some VPN providers have sent browsing information to law enforcement officials. There are VPN programs out there. Hotspot Shield
is a free software that creates a VPN for you to use for free, but comes with ads on every website you visit on the free version.
• HOSTS File: You can read about the HOSTS file here
and how you can use it to block out advertising sites, data mining websites, pornographic sites, whatever you want. You can find a HUGE list of bad websites to add to your hosts file here
. You do not have to add all of them, but I would recommend adding 127.0.0.1 google-analytics.com for sure. This is part of Google and what they do is capture the websites you visit, and many sites have this data miner on there. With using the HOSTS file, some websites may load faster because some of these ads that are blocked take a while to load since most of them use flash. Also, blocking off too many sites can break some websites causing them not to run properly.
• If you use a Homegroup to share files between computers on your network, make sure you have a pretty good password. You don't want to share files with an unknown computer on your network.
• Make sure that your system is updated to the latest version and that it has all the required files installed.
• If you don't have the most recent version of your operating system, at least update the system files to their current versions.
• Update old drivers as well. You can download free driver checker programs from the Internet. Make sure you get them from reputable sources. Don't be clicking on ads and downloading supposed driver checkers from there. Not unless you want a virus or something. You can find some driver checkers at Download.com
. Most of them will make you pay to download the recent drivers to your computer. You can also check out the Driverpack Solution
. Another site to check out is http://driverpacks.net/
• If you are on Windows, install a good anti-virus program, even though they really give you a false sense of security. There are too many viruses, trojans, worms, etc. made everyday that most anti-viruses won't stop them all. Only a certain percentage of those risks are dected by anti-virus programs. That doesn't mean you shouldn't still have one. Good anti-virus programs include: Microsoft Security Essentials
, ESET NOD32
. Avoid McAfee and Norton.
• Yes, Macs do get viruses. Although they are rare. Apple covers up the fact that they can get viruses, so you do not hear of Mac viruses often.
• Install or tweak your firewall. If you are on Windows, you should think about getting a third party firewall since Windows Firewall isn't too good. I recommend getting Zonealarm
• Easy to use Linux distros: Linux Mint
, and Ubuntu's derivatives
(different desktop enviornments). I HIGHLY recommend using one of those distros if you only use your computer for browsing the web. They are real secure and get less viruses compared to Windows. But if you love Windows and want to try out Linux, you can install Linux with Windows using WUBI
for the Ubuntu derivatives and this
method for Linux Mint. You can always dual boot using partitions.
• Instead of Google Chrome, use Chromium. Chrome is built on Chromium and there is no significant difference between the two browsers but Chrome updates itself and Flash without your permission. That is a characteristic of a botnet. Chrome feels it does not need your permission to make changes to itself. Firefox is okay.
• Avoid using Internet Explorer as your main browser. It's a good browser, it just doesn't have much to offer in terms of addons and extensions to make it better or more secure.
• Extensions that are a must have for your browsers are Ghostery
(anti-tracker) [Available on most browsers], Noscript
(Anti-Google data mining) [Firefox], Better Privacy
(cookie cleaner) [Firefox], Track Me Not
(anti-data mining) [Firefox & Chrome], Adblock Plus
(ad blocker) [Firefox, Safari, Chrome] HTTPS Everywhere
• Use open source software if you can. That means they are free and you can modify the source code. You can trust open source over proprietary which is closed source software. Closed source software are usually bundled with crap you don't need and may even need adware and spyware to run.
• Encrypt sensitive documents and files using encryption programs like Safehouse Explorer
. Truecrypt can allow you to create a hidden drive and you could store files in it. Truecrypt can also encrypt a partition or drive.
• Microsoft Bitlocker
built into Vista Ultimate and 7 Ultimate, also provides drive encryption and it will also encrypt flash drives.
• If you are prone to forgetting passwords, there are password “lockers” that will store your passwords. You only need to remember one password. An example of this is Keepass
• One must have program is CCleaner
for the cleaning of unwanted files from your computer. It will clean up temp files, your recycle bin, browsing histories, memory dumps, bad registry files etc.
is an anonymizing program that will make you anonymous while browsing the Internet. It will NOT encrypt any traffic so it is not recommended for anything involving serious private data like banking. You can read a little bit more about Tor here
is a program that blocks bad connections from connecting to your computer. It is used mainly when downloading torrents.
• There are two portable VPN programs that you can buy which will have your VPN settings and use them between computers. Portable VPN Portable VPN
• You can use these programs for setting up SSH Tunnels. Putty Myentunnel Tunnelier
• You can use Teamviewer
to remotely login to other computers or you can use this to create a VPN between two computers. Available for Windows, Linux and Mac OSX. You can even remotely login to a computer using a mobile phone.
• Two programs that get around Internet firewalls, censorship, and makes you anonymous are Ultrasurf
. Freegate is not available in the US.
• Extreme Password Generator Pro
can create difficult to crack passwords if you can't think of any. It has different options for you to use.
is a program that can wipe files and folders and they can not be recovered. This is a must have if you deal with sensitive information and you need to delete them.
is a bootable disk image that you can burn and with DBAN you can wipe out your hard drive when you want to sell your computer, or you have a lot of sensitive information that you need to get rid of.
• Revo Uninstaller
is an amazing program used to uninstall files from Windows, and it scans for any stray files and registry edits that did not get removed during the uninstall process.
• System Explorer Process Explorer Process Hacker
is a program for Windows, that will search the computer for programs, files and services that run at the startup of the computer. You can use this program to disable the automatic run of malicious programs and services.
• Virtual Box
and VMware Player
are two amazing programs where you can install an operating system into! You can run Windows 7 and install Windows XP into one of those two programs and you can use some applications that may not run on Windows 7 and you can run them in a virtual machine. You can use virtual machines to install suspicious apps that you do not want on the host machine. You can run other operating systems like Linux, FreeBSD, Mac OSX and Solaris. Changes inside the virtual machine will not affect the host system.
is a program where you can install apps in an isolated space that will not make permanent changes to the operating system. You can install an internet browser and you can be rest assured that you will not get anymore infections to your computer. It is like running a program in a literal sandbox and it will not make changes outside the sandbox.
• VMWare Thinapp
is exactly like Sandboxie for the professional crowd. You can even make programs portable by using this program.
is a cloud web file hosting service that you can use to backup some of your files for school or work. One thing to consider is not to upload sensitive data because they have looked at files before.
You can send encrypted emails with software found here. It is a little complicated to set up.
• There is no reason that we should keep using Facebook. They do not care about our privacy because they sell our private data to third parties. They also give data to law enforcement agencies. Google does the same. Just check out Gmail and look at the ads. They will always be relevant to what our emails are about because they data mine as well. There are alternatives out there like: DIASPORA
. It is still in its Alpha phase, but it should be good enough to use as an alternative to Facebook.
• Disconnect all apps from Facebook. If you have apps on Facebook they will post to your wall the articles you read from news sites, the songs you are listening to on Pandora and Spotify, what games you are playing, etc.
is a good site that has applications that you can put on your flash drive. All of the settings are saved to the flash drive and not the computer itself. They are all optimized to do this. Some apps include Firefox, Chrome, Thunderbird, VLC among others. You do not need to be admin to install these to the flash drive.
is like portableapps.com but without the optimization. They do have a lot of apps to choose from and details as to it leaves traces on the computers you use them on.
• Google search engine alternatives: DuckDuckGo
. Google Maps alternatives: openstreetmap.org maps.nokia.com
• Encrypted email hosts: lavabit.com gmx.com hushmail.com
(hushmail has sent information to law enforcement officials )
I2P is a layer of anonymity for many of the programs you use. It isn't perfect but it will make things harder for hackers and third parties
• FreeNet Project
You can share, browse and publish files only accessible through freenet.
• Paypal Alternatives: http://www.ehow.com/way_5481191_alternatives-paypal.html http://www.screw-paypal.com/alternatives/top_pick.html
• Prepaid cards: http://www.theprivacyguy.com/anonymous-credit-debit-cards/
Other things to know
• Use flash drives and external hard drives to store files that you don't want on your computer. These can be sensitive files in case your laptop gets lost or stolen.
• Install a fresh OS when you buy a new or used computer. I say this because sometimes computers come pre-installed with a bunch of crap that normal people have no use for. That includes manufacturer bloatware. They can also contain keyloggers or other mailicious applications. You can start fresh and install all of your favorite apps on a new operating system install.
• TRENDNET camera IP vulnerability
. TRENDnet cameras have vulnerabilities that allow hackers to view what is being streamed by the cameras. If you have one of those cameras, update the firmware from here
. Seriously, I have seen some of the feeds, and on two instances I saw bedrooms and one had a crib where a family kept their baby. It was some scary stuff.
• Be careful when you use your smart phones. They have GPS and other stuff that can track down your locations and keep records of them for long period of time. Some phones even have a keylogger called Carrier IQ as seen here
Worrying about your privacy on the Internet DOES NOT MAKE YOU A TERRORIST. You are smart enough to know that there are bad people who want to do bad things with your information. That is a hypocritical statement by the Fraudulent Bureau of Idiots. They really care about their privacy otherwise anyone will seize their sensitive documents. http://publicintelligence.net/do-you-like-online-privacy-you-may-be-a-terrorist/
Having privacy means you own your information and not a third party. I don't get how people brush this off and not necessary. You wouldn't want people going through your mail nor to go through your house without your permission. That also means that whatever is in your house can be written down and sold to someone else without you knowing and you do not see a dime about it.
This newest blog post is more entertaining than anything else. Usually I write about much more serious issues but this is a big enough story that I feel I need to talk about. Female Rapper Nicki Manaj known for her lightning quick delivery and ridiculous flow, something we have never heard from a female rapper is simply a fraud! Nicki Manaj may be a real person but that is not her voice rapping. It's someone you all know, some of us very well, Jay-Z. Now When I first heard this story the other day and it was as far as I know originally broken by Vice magazine and a friend of mine posted it so I can't take any credit for breaking it or figuring it out , I thought NO WAY! C'mon. Then I listened to Superbass Slowed Down and sure enough he here comes on the very first verse! It is supposedly Nicki Manaj but in reality it's Jay-Z. It took me a few times to be certain but it's him. It's even his style and pace. Have a listen.......
YOUTUBE HAS REMOVED THIS FIRST VIDEO!!!! ITS OKAY THOUGH. WE HAVE PLENTY MORE. MOVE TO THE NEXT. ITS ANOTHER SONG OF HERS SLOWED DOWN.
Are you going to tell me that is not him? I do not listen to too much of today's hip hop. I listen to mostly my old stuff but you know who my favorite has been since he came out? Jay-Z. I've had every album, song, etc. I know his voice. This is something that when researching it I really felt that I have somewhat of a valuable opinion here since I listen to Jay-Z all the time. It's him. I asked a few friends and they agreed. Now just in case you think this was some random thing check this next one out. This is "Nicki Manaj" in Moment For Life. This one will end any skepticism. Have a listen. "She" has the first verse. This is Moment For Life slowed down. I do not know the exact % it is slowed. I will try and figure that out and maybe update the blog. I would think it would be an odd % that way people don't accidentally stumble on it.
STILL HAVE ANY DOUBT????? Even the lyrics are stuff he would say!
That is Jay-Z folks. I feel bad if you vested too much interest in Nicki Manaj
JUST ADDED TODAY!!! This one is a slam dunk!!! I had to come back and add it! Try to tell yourself that's not Jay-Z. This is from a song called "Right Through Me" by Nicki Manaj(supposedly) Have a listen to this!!! The source I got the audio from is provided right below.
JUST PRESS PLAY!!!!!!
Well??? What did you think about the above audio clip??? Can you look yourself in the mirror and say that is not Jay-Z? The 2nd verse he calls himself Nicki AGAIN! This is from HER SONG. NOT A JAY-Z track nor anything he is credited as being on. You speed this up and you have the retail version Nicki Manaj aka Jay-Z on high speed dubbing like back in the day. Here is the video I made that clip from. Go to 47 seconds if you want.
Wanna hear Jay-Z Sing A Slow Jam??? Autotuned.
Play it again. Go ahead. Listen to it. Tell me that's not a Jay-Z track. I'll be here waiting. You want some more? I have some collaboration with other rappers and "Nicki". Go to 2:30 of this song and press play. That's where "she" comes in.
Do you still think that is Nicki Manaj? I hope to god not! Hear is another. Supposedly "Nicki" Lil Wayne and Birdman. "Nicki" has the first verse.
So does Jay-Z Sound Like Nicki When Sped Up? Yep.
Now here "she" is in "regular" speed. Listen to her in this first verse. Pretty nasty huh? Now listen to the first verse in the video below this one. Same video. Wow when did Jay-Z open this song?? lol You've been had!!
Here's the same song slowed down. Listen to the first verse. Play it for friends. They will ask "What's this new Jay-Z Song your playing??
I don"t really need to explain anymore do I??? Is there any doubt to you that is Jay-Z?
A friend of mine made a good point. He said" I bet Jay-Z and one of these other guys were in the studio screwing around and Jay probably said I bet you a million dollars I could seld platinum albums as a female rapper" I agree. It probably was something like that. Some of you might not be old enough to remember Milli Vanilli but this is certainly not the first time this has been done. It is very brazen to use the most popular rapper in the world's voice to do it though. Will you still listen to Nicki? Will you buy her albums now that you know she is a total fraud and its just Jay-Z sped up? Look at some of the lyrics. They aren't even tailored for a chic. He talks about being the king with the crown. Being the heavyweight champ. It's so obvious now. I can't believe I didn't see it before. I have honestly not heard too much of her music until this. If I want to hear Nicki Ill sped up the music I already have.BTW If you guys want to know the real truth about some stuff that actually matters, check out my other blogs!Thank You, Brian S Staveleywww.TheRealNewsOnline.comwww.TheLastAmerican.org
This Is How She Rolls Into The Grammy Awards!
This was just added to the blog. There is no way you anyone can say that is not him. That is Jay-Z! If You read this a few days ago this is new please listen! This mp3 slams the door shut on this case!!
The U.S. government has known about them forever and as a matter of fact Megaupload actually had a deal already going on for years with some of the major record labels like say Universal where people from the record companies has complete access to Megauploads site to remove links of anything that led back to something they owned the rights to! Megaupload would give companies over 5000 removals per day so they were doing more than playing ball. So then why the shutdown?? Mega upload was about to start a new service called Megabox. Now before we even get into what Megabox is, you all know what ITunes is. Well if you didn't know Google is launching it's own cloud based music service where you never need to sync your evice it's just always there. Google music I'm sure would be well over a dollar per song. The artist gets about 13 cents on the dollar from a download. So you have these two Tech Giants Google & Apple with these highly priced music services and now let's talk about Megabox.
MegaBox was going to be a cloud based music service where the artist was actually going to get 90 cents on the dollar! Now the songs would be cheaper so people would flock there if the selection was good. Artists would love to be on there because they were going to get 45 cents on a song that's 50 cents. Not only that when the music is much cheaper more people will buy it. They were essentially going to cut the record labels out. The big dogs! They were not going to let all of this happen! Your going to first rival the NSA and US government aka Google. I don't think so. Then on top of this you are going to cut out these huge labels that have billions upon billions and have built these fortunes by raping artists for years? I don't think so. Think of how well this would have worked. What artist wouldn't want to go to Megaupload instead? Maybe you haven't heard of them but in the computer world they are big. Not only that the straw that might have broke the camels back was a promotional video put out by huge artists like Kanye West and Puff Daddy talking about how they love MegaUpload!?? WHAT?? I thought their music was getting pirated on there? When you look at this commercial and the fact that they say they've been investigating them for two years makes it sound like a setup from the word go to me. Either way they had a lot of very mainstream and large artist's support so it doesn't appear that Megabox would have any trouble catching on fast.
We need to remember it's more than just the hundreds of billions the labels would lose. They would be pioneers and change the whole industry and put the money back in the artists hands. Again they would not let this happen. The other point I wanted to make is not only is it money it's the message. The message in today's popular music is very much controlled. They will not let Megaupload cause them to lose control over that! They shape very much of society through the message put out in the commercialized music. They are not going to let Kim DotCom change all of this.
MegaUpload and other sites like them have been around for years. The timing is quite suspicious with Google music about to launch. A lot of users use MegaUpload for legit reasons as online storage. Researchers store photos, videos and documents People put stuff from their jobs on there. Many of their users are planning to sue the F.B.I. if they can't get the proper access to their materials. This is not over file sharing people. It's over Kim DotCom and the folks at MegaUpload having a vision to change the industry. Were they going to make a boatload of cash off of it? Sure. That's good business. Doesn't Bill Gates make a boatload of cash? People love him and he's a scumbag that has no respect for human life. These guys had a vision but it would disrupt the power structure in our country too much so it couldn't happen.
Megabox had another service that was part of it. Megakey would actually pay the artists when their songs got DOWNLOADED FOR FREE!!! That's right. Now the artists were actually going to get paid when their stuff was pirated. What a bunch of bad guys. Let's extradite Kim DotCom to the United States. C'mon. Give me a break! I thought extradition was for murderers and rapists. Now it's for copyright infringement?? How does he get extradited here anyways? He's not even a U.S. citizen! See what happens when you step outside the box and try and do something good? Do you see what happens when you rival Google? Do you see what happens when you oppose the huge record labels? Some artists have been killed for it in the past. It's pretty much always been covered up and I'm not going to speculate into murders I haven't studied but you can bet your ass people have been killed for much less! Here's the video I say may have been the straw that broke the camel's back! I'm sure the labels weren't happy about this. Obviously it's not really that big of a deal their stuff is being swapped on there. The video includes kim kardashian, puff daddy, will.i.am, alicia keys, snoop dogg, chris brown, kanye west, lil john, jamie foxx, serena williams, russel simons, brett rattner, floyd mayweather, estelle, carmello anthony, ciara, the game, mary j blidge, swizz beatz, kim dotcom, kim junior, etchttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCkI5I8vsBg
By the way they didn't need SOPA, PIPA, or ACTA to do this! They make us feel like we have a victory for now over SOPA then this happens. They always make the legislation after to justify whatever they are doing. Now we are wasting good resources extraditing a foreigner into the United States for giving Google, Sony, Universal, and others a run for their money.
Welcome to America Kim DotCom. Land of the Free, Home of the Brave. Haaaaaaaaaa!
Brian S Staveley www.TheRealNewsOnline.com
As you all know Megaupload has been in the news a lot lately. They would have you believe the F.B.I. shut them down because they are the biggest file sharing website in the world. This comes right at a time when anti piracy and I use those terms loosely, more like when censorship bills are in the forefront of all discussion amongst those who would be considered aware. The raid of Megaupload and possible extradition to the United Stated of its CEO and maybe others had nothing to do with them being the number one file sharing site. It was about shutting down competition to a lot of powerful entities.
"I believe the Federal government has grown out of control, threatening the Rights, Liberties, and Property of the People". "This is being done at the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial level. This is in direct opposition to the Constitution and the Founding Fathers vision for the Federal government.
"Because I believe this, today I exercised my right as a Free Citizen, and did not visit the White House. This was not about politics or party, as in my opinion both parties are responsible for the situation we are in as a country. This was about a choice I had to make as an INDIVIDUAL.
"This is the only public statement I will be making on this topic. TT"
First off he says right in there that this is not a political or party issue. He is talking in the terms I talk in often. Its not right and left. Its right versus wrong! Hearing the Globe and others trying to make this a party issue is laughable. Actually its not. It pisses me off. I want to write to them and call the sports talk radio shows around Boston. Someone needs to set these people straight. So Hold on here. Here's a celebrity with a little bit of spotlight on him and he is very upset about the police state this country has become so he is using his spotlight to tell his beliefs. What is so wrong with that? People that don't get it, won't get this either. The message Tim is trying to put out is a message that is being censored from the masses. The people that still blindly trust corporate liars like Fox News and CNN will never understand. Obviously Tim Thomas is living in the real world.
The people like the Boston Globe who try and make this a left right issue should have their press passes revoked, their career ended and their credibility complete shot. Now The Globe is calling for Thomas to be traded!! Our MVP Goalie. Stanley Cup Champion. Are you serious Globe? For what? Traded for what reason? Is your head that far up your ass over there?? Apparently so.
The facts of the matter are Tim Thomas is right. 100 percent. The federal government is out of control and has been since 9-11. C'mon they grab your genitals at the airport now. All over nothing. All over an enemy they created to be able to push thru all these new laws and lock us down. It's about time someone big like Thomas speaks out. I speak out on these things all the time. But who knows how amny are hearing it. A couple hundred? A couple thousand?? With Tim Thomas tens of millions are talking about this. People look into what he says. Look at what happens in the airport. Look what has happened to your food supply. Look at our privacy. The FBI can enter your home with no warrant now. They are shutting down websites if they don't like your opinion. They are shutting down Facebook groups if you are speaking truth. I wish our whole team was like Thomas.
He didn't show up for a stupid photo with he next fall guy. Boo Hoo. Do they make a big deal if people don't show up to other NON Hockey Related team stuff like a fundraiser or autograph session? No they don't. The problem is people have no idea of what the White House has really been doing for years. Staging violence and other events to get the guns out of the hands of all the Americans. Waging war on nation after nation unprovoked. That is out of control. If you don't see that don't blame it on Timmy. Shut off your TV and get some real information. You have been lied to about everything and it has warped your sense of reality. Tim Thomas lives in the world of reality. He knows of the attrocities yes I said attrocities commited by this government against free living citizens of the world including it's own. Experimenting on the public like lab rats. Purposely toxifying your air, water, and food. Tainting the vaccines, radiating Iraq, torturing people at Guantanamo Bay, starting revolutions to over throw democratically elected leaders of middle eastern countries. Spying on its own citizens. Making it illegal to video tape cops. Oh what's that? You clicked this thread because it was a sports one and you've never heard these other things??? Well they are true and they need to be brought to light and thankfully Timmy has done that. The only question is now that you know what will you do with the knowledge?
For those of you who don't know who he is, Tim Thomas is the goalie for the Boston Bruins hockey team. The other day when his team was to visit the White House to celebrate their Stanley Cup win Tim Thomas declined the invitation. Then when asked why, he told the truth. Something that has become borderline criminal in this country! The way Tim Thomas is being misunderstood in the media truly shows the sad state we are in as a nation. People always complain that celebrities don't think or stand up for whats right. Tim Thomas is standing up for what he believes is right.What I believe is right and what any person who is paying attention to what is REALLY happening believes is right. Before we go further let's take another look at his statements.